Sufficient experimental data results and well-written articles

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please ask the supervisor to give a grade based on your own experimental results and article writing situation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How many points does my essay have?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

What preparations are needed for outdoor activities?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

Accepted after the major revisions. The two reviewers, one is more layman, and the other is more pertinent. I carefully revised it in accordance with the comments for about two months and then resubmitted. It got accepted after 2 months. According to my experience, it is better to edit it for a longer period. I have done this for three consecutive articles. There were major revisions to made and I re-submitted it till DUE. After the modification, check it every few days and you can always find that there are still some areas that can be optimized. It is always good to optimize several times. Then I wrote the reply carefully, made more changes, responded carefully, and made corresponding revisions. Basically, the problems were not big. Most of the people I know resubmitted the materials soon after the major revisions, and another minor revision was required in the end. This is the same situation for my two friends. Sometimes the problem of major revisions is quite simple, but it is much more annoying for the minor revision. I hope that the impact factor will go up again, come on!

(0) 讚！ | 苏达馨

Already a relatively good journal, I am very happy to accept it.

(1) 讚！ | Quella

Review Speed: 4.0
Experience Sharing: It is already a relatively good journal, so I am very happy to accept

(0) 讚！ | 德温贝儿

Too unpredictable, dropped a little more than last year, can we maintain a 3 point next year, it feels unreliable

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Bullish, will it rise again next year?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁