When responding to the comments of reviewers, all issues must be addressed one by one without omission; try to meet the experimental supplements suggested in the comments, and if unable to meet them, provide reasonable reasons why not; be sure to cite the literature recommended by the reviewer and discuss thoroughly; when submitting the revised manuscript, be sure to check the corrections made in the original draft.

If you agree with the editor's modification suggestions when replying to the comments from the journal editor, just accept the modifications directly. If you disagree, write your reasons directly below the comments, and then provide feedback to the editor. If both parties do not agree, negotiate again

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If possible, try to conduct additional experiments. If not, carefully consider reasons and defend your position, but maintain a humble and cautious tone. After all, even major revisions have a certain rejection rate

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The reviewer requested that I supplement the experiment, but my samples have already been used up/experiment has ended. Will I be rejected if I just say my samples ran out?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

What is the difference between responding to reviewer comments and responding to editor comments?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Why can't I log in to the journal homepage?

(0) 讚！ | 岱宗千冬

It's still a little over 5, not much change, but staying steady is considered above average

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Fast rejection, very quick

(0) 讚！ | 冰心壬辰

Tragedy, formatting issues

(0) 讚！ | Horace Mike

Tragedy, typesetting problem.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Research focus: Mental disorders; Schizophrenia

(0) 讚！ | 纯阳岳阳

Research focus: Mental disorders; Schizophrenia

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁