Hello, is there a co-author confirmation in the email sent to each author after submission? Is it necessary for each author to click on the confirmation?

(0) 讚！ | 进退两难

Hello, may I ask if the email sent to each author after submission includes a co-author confirmation, and is it necessary for each author to click on confirm?

(0) 讚！ | 进退两难

Hello, is there a co-author confirmation in the email sent to each author after submission? Is it mandatory for each author to click confirm?

(0) 讚！ | 进退两难

When can CD be compared to JC? CD being able to enter the second district while JAS is already a joke in the third district. Now CD has turned into something domestic, absolutely don't compare CD to JC, JAS, JGRA, MWR, and so on.

(0) 讚！ | oceanair

After submitting for more than half a month, it finally went for review. I don't know what the outcome will be. Wishing you well, wishing you well, wishing you well. New year, new atmosphere.

(20) 讚！ | 果儿小亲亲

JC is classified as Zone 2, and the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is really outrageous!

(36) 讚！ | xwzj

Both the JC and CD in the meteorological category are in the second tier. The classification system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has completely become a shit.

(0) 讚！ | 一刀倾城

Congratulations to JC for winning the second district, and congratulations to AR for winning the first district. Although AR is not worthy of shining JC's shoes, the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is just that domineering.

(44) 讚！ | 一刀倾城

District 2? What is the level of this journal?

(3) 讚！ | Enlighten_qm

Old industry leading magazine, unexpectedly ranked in the top of the second district.

(10) 讚！ | GRL

The top publication in the field of climate change, highly regarded within the industry, is known for its high publishing difficulty.

(23) 讚！ | LiPR

The second submission to J. Climate involved three reviewers. The first reviewer took a month and a half to provide feedback, suggesting minor revisions or rejection. The second reviewer rejected the submission outright. The editor ultimately decided to reject the manuscript. We were not satisfied with this outcome and diligently addressed and responded to the reviewers' comments. After making revisions for two months, we resubmitted the paper with a bold face, but this time with a new editor. However, the new editor still sent the manuscript and our response back to the previous three reviewers. Two of them recommended acceptance directly, and one suggested minor revisions. After making the revisions and resubmitting within a week, the paper was accepted one month later. Overall, the quality of J. Climate is good, and the review process is fast and professional.

(33) 讚！ | 香香

The magazine has a very good reputation. I was lucky to get accepted on my first submission, but it also took nearly a year. The reviewers were very professional and asked challenging and detailed questions. They even provided feedback on the revisions we made. In my opinion, JC, ACP, and JGR are the three leading journals in the atmospheric field.

(28) 讚！ | who are you

It has been one month after the submission, the status was still with editor, and I don’t know why.

(0) 讚！ | 果叔

The manuscript was submitted to Nature Communication, but it was not sent for review. After rewriting, it was transferred to JC. The review speed is very fast, returning within a month of the first review, which also includes Christmas and New Year's Day. A total of three reviewers, two required minor revisions, one required major revision; the comments for major revisions were very detailed. They gave a total of more than 50 opinions. After that, it underwent a minor revision and then got accepted. It took almost 5 months from submission to acceptance. I was very satisfied with the submission experience and learned a lot from it. After the article was accepted, it was published as an early online release on the official website, but the typesetting was very slow.

(3) 讚！ | 香香

Wife just received a JC and made the remote sensing content of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau aerosol. It lasted 10 months and 3 rounds of rigorous review. The reviewers are all big bulls in the industry.Nearly harsh, and finally ended in perfection.Personal evaluation: JC is a top journal for climate meteorology, with high recognition in the industry, requiring high innovation and working system.

(2) 讚！ | 631366314@qq.com

3 reviewers. All reasonable. Easy to get a revision opportunity.

(15) 讚！ | Max Planck

Submitted in June last year, overhauled three times a minor repair, is a very good journal, so the requirements are also strict, the editor is very niceEncourage, it took a year to finally receive.

(7) 讚！ | elainerw

There may be a lot of articles now, and the review period is long. After 3 months, it is reminded to return 3 times. There will be three reviewers in the common research field.

(2) 讚！ | salt

Atmospheric science field, the comprehensive strength of the paper before the 3 bar

(0) 讚！ | scipubfindme

The orthodox in the orthodox atmospheric science journal focuses on the climate.

(0) 讚！ | ak47

has published 6 articles above.Good publications, but now there are more manuscripts, and the review cycle has been lengthened.

(12) 讚！ | Anonymous

very good, speed and review comments.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is a very powerful journal

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I have not submitted a manuscript, but I have communicated with friends who are engaged in meteorology, and I agree that it is a comparative journal

(0) 讚！ | 匿名