Do I need to commission a review article, or can I submit without commissioning?

(0) 讚！ | 咘咘咘咘

After submission, nearly 2 months passed before being rejected after external review. Of the three reviewers, one suggested minor revisions, while the other two rejected the submission outright. 

JCA’s citation impact factor is not high, but it still has a good reputation in the field of chromatography analysis. However, the feedback from this external review was unexpectedly absurd. There were no substantial suggestions, and the points raised by the experts who rejected the submission contradicted each other. It feels like they didn’t read the manuscript carefully, as they questioned why certain materials were not provided even though they were clearly mentioned in the paper. They rejected it directly without even giving me a chance to respond, leaving me speechless.

The submission experience with JCA this time was quite disappointing, maybe luck was not on my side

(0) 讚！ | 枫下拉莫

24.4.2 Submission
24.4.5 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | 小吃货

Is there a layout fee for this?

(0) 讚！ | waky_1

Still as fast as always, you can always trust JCA.

(0) 讚！ | 宁静的夜晚

May I ask how likely it is after "under review"? It has been 3 weeks since I submitted for review.

(0) 讚！ | hao_chi

Article history:
Received: 24 June 2022
Revised: 8 August 2022
Accepted: 9 August 2022
Available online: 11 August 2022

Upon the first submission, the formatting of the submitted materials was incorrect. After making revisions, the article was resubmitted on 24th June and sent for review the following day. The review process involved three reviewers and took three weeks. The editor provided feedback requesting major revisions, including the addition of an experiment. After three weeks of revisions, the manuscript was further polished (with a language editing certificate provided). The revised version was accepted the day after it was resubmitted.

(0) 讚！ | suocao

Received the first review comments 11 days after submission, took a break, returned after 14 days of revision, second review took 3 days, accepted; two days later, proofread, published online on the same day. From submission to online publication, it took one month, impressive speed, responsible reviewers, and editors with dedication.

(1) 讚！ | zhiyong2020

Received at Editorial Office: 4 Apr 2022
Article revised: 7 Jun 2022
Article accepted for publication: 13 Jun 2022

The revision of the article was delayed for a month until the final deadline. The process was fast. There were two reviewers who provided approximately thirty comments in total. The article required major revisions, with modifications made at the word and sentence level. It was accepted a week later.

(4) 讚！ | herk

September 30th - Submission
October 1st - Assignment of Editor-in-Chief
November 9th - Major Revision
December 20th - Return for Correction
December 31st - Acceptance

(1) 讚！ | xihawuchang

My article type is a Review article, but it was published as a Research article. How can this be resolved?

(36) 讚！ | 超钰

From submission to acceptance, it only took one month, a very good journal.

(1) 讚！ | 超钰

You can go to Elsevier's support center to seek help. You can send them an email to seek assistance.
https://service.elsevier.com/app/contact/supporthub/publishing/

(0) 讚！ | xfll00

Can I ask why after submitting the manuscript for major revisions and creating a PDF, the marked manuscripts and revised manuscripts cannot be displayed? They appear as blank pages, but the hyperlinked references are still visible. How can this issue be resolved? It's urgent.

(0) 讚！ | 蛋蛋

May I ask why marked manuscripts and revised manuscripts cannot be displayed as blank pages when submitting the manuscript after major revisions? I need a solution urgently.

(0) 讚！ | 蛋蛋

The manuscript was submitted in February 2020, and a lot of comments were given. After careful revisions, it was accepted in May. What I have done is related to the new CE-MS and application. JCA is as strong as ever.

(2) 讚！ | 张

It was my first submission. 2020.2.8, submission; 2020.3.6, the comments of revision were returned; 2020.3.9, the revision was submitted; 2020.3.10, accept. The efficiency of this journal was high.

(11) 讚！ | PX2020

A classic journal in the field of chromatography. It is so good. The comments given by the reviewers are also very pertinent, which is of great help to my paper. I also hope that the journal will become better and better!

(19) 讚！ | hello man

I submitted a manuscript March 28 (28/3/18) and the peer review process was completed May 8 (8/5/18); the manuscript was accepted with revisions. The peer review was very thorough and there were many thoughtful comments and suggestions provided. The editor (Dr. John Dorsey) was very kind and helpful. The revision was resubmitted June 4 (4/6/18), accepted June 10 (10/6/18), and the unformatted version was available online June 11, 2018 (11/6/18).

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

4 weeks to first decision. The editor affirmed the novelty and innovation of the research. Each suggestion was very accurate.

(283) 讚！ | 3D张

12 Mar 2018, SubmissionAfter a major repair, two minor repairs, after the second trial24 Jul 2018, Refusal.The editor is very rigorous, and the reviewers are 5, which is quite difficult. I don’t know why the impact factor has dropped.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

Chromatography A speed is really fast!thank you very much!Received in a month and a few days!I wish the journal is getting better and better!

(0) 讚！ | hahaha

3 months, how come there is no news, it is too slow now, the reminder is useless, the editor simply ignores me

(2) 讚！ | jzj55

2017.7.12 Submitted Journal
 7.13 under review8.15 moderate revision8.23 submitted to the journal, under review, modified for seven days8.24 acceptedThe article is creative, novel, the article is very easy

(8) 讚！ | DIDN

Submitted in 7.12 last month, review after 2 days, review in the middle, 8.1 today review, the first time to select for this journal, hope to have a good result, graduate student second SCI

(6) 讚！ | DIDN