It is not difficult to revise a paper, but the review comments are very detailed. The journal is still okay, and those who need assistance can contact me for a quick publication

(0) 讚！ | Rocky2022

This year I was lucky enough to receive a letter, reviewed by four reviewers, with close to thirty comments. The impact factor was not high, but the reviewers were still very strict. I will continue to try submitting to other journals that I haven't been able to publish in

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小怜容

Calculate the average value (Mean) using Average(), the standard deviation (SD) using STDEV.S(), and the standard error (SEM) using STDEV.S()/COUNT()^0.5

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Plot error bars using ggplot2/Excel, etc. In Excel, right-click on the bar, select "Data Series Format," choose "Error Bars," then select "Custom."

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What should I do if error bars are missing on a bar graph?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

How to calculate the margin of error?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

Low-quality periodical, one word slow

(0) 讚！ | 诗双小郎君

From less than 1.5 points, now approaching 2 points, is a good phenomenon, this magazine is worth owning

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 24.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: Submission Date: April 2014
First Review Result: June 2015 (14 months in total) (Major revision)
Second Review Date: August 2015 (Minor revision)
Second Review Result: October 2015 (Minor revision)
Third Review Result: December 2015 (Accepted)
This is the slowest submission I have ever experienced

(0) 讚！ | 特里斯塔斯克里普斯

This magazine gives me the feeling of being rigorous and friendly, and the opinions presented are very fair. The first submission took 3 months for the initial review, was rejected, but the feedback provided was very valuable. The second submission took a month and a half for the initial review, the reviewers were more detailed, some minor changes were made, and it was accepted two months later

(0) 讚！ | 鹰爪逸秀

The previous student is right. The review time is okay, averaging around 1 month. After submission, major revisions, and minor revisions, responses are received within about 1 month at each stage. The questions are not sharp, and the attitude is good

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It's not as fast as I thought. It took 3 months for the first review, and it was rejected, but the feedback was still very constructive

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0
Experience sharing: Submitted for more than a month, but rejected. However, both reviewers and editors were careful and friendly. There were two reviewers who asked pertinent questions and the speed was fast

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Just won the lottery. There is an option: if you pay $2000, your article will be put on well-known databases like PubMed, increasing its impact. If not, it will just be published in the journal. I told my boss, and he said pay! So grateful to my boss

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: When I submitted, the Impact Factor (IF) was 1.084, feeling okay, but I didn't expect it to drop below 1 in 2012. Checked the historical IF of the journal and found that the IF in 2012 was the lowest in history. Hoping it can rebound to over 1 like in 2008 in 2013. Review time is acceptable, averaging one month. After submission, major revision, and minor revision, replies were received in about a month for each stage. The IF is relatively low, but the reviewers are responsible and ask professional questions. Currently waiting for the conclusion after minor revision, which was returned on August 5th and should be out around the 10th. The page charges are still unclear

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Are they charging a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Why am I not getting any response no matter how much I apply?

(0) 讚！ | 梓暄小公主

Review process is fast, questions are not critical, it takes less than 2 months from submission to revision, acceptance, and online publication

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Accidentally submitted to JC, it took nearly 2 months for the review, which was very thorough and raised a lot of questions. After the response, they all seemed to accept it without any further questions. We actually went from clinical to molecular mechanisms, which seemed like too much, at least molecular biology probably wasn't necessary, as none of the 3 reviewers raised any questions about it. Overall, it feels like a lot of time was spent, but it turned out relatively well, and is most suitable for passing the assessment

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The magazine is quite good, with a fast review speed and not very sharp review questions

(0) 讚！ | 七星靖之