Where can I find the validation report?

(0) 讚！ | ssszzzwww

Where can I find the validation report?

(0) 讚！ | ssszzzwww

Where can I find the validation report?

(0) 讚！ | ssszzzwww

Where can I find the Validation Report template?

(0) 讚！ | ssszzzwww

The first time I've seen such a trashy system, should have rejected it early on instead of dragging it out and wasting everyone's time

(0) 讚！ | 抓紧毕业的研究生

It's so frustrating. I received feedback after my first submission and made revisions based on the feedback before submitting it again for the second time. However, the result was the same as the first, with the same rejection comments.

(0) 讚！ | 想毕业的研究生

Hello, may I ask where to find the validation report?

(0) 讚！ | 想毕业的研究生

Hello, I would like to ask where to find the validation report when submitting a manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 想毕业的研究生

The review process was quite long, almost 3 months. However, the production (typesetting) of the paper took unbelievable 3.5 months!
It is hard to understand, how an accepted paper can got stuck for so long time without a final citable version.

(0) 讚！ | stejfav@vscht.cz

The reviewing process is slow, just have to wait. After the first major revision, the comments and the reviewer's opinions were not consistent, so there was a second major revision. The reviewer asked a question, and I explained it with the mechanism and references. I told him that someone had already done it and it was not feasible. But in the second revision, he suggested that I conduct an experiment. (It's like someone has already eaten a watermelon, taken a photo, and told you that the inside is red, but you don't believe it and insist on cutting it open to see if it's really red.)

The key point is that after the second revision, when I finished the changes, the editor directly rejected the submission?!?! There wasn't even a chance for it to be sent for review. The reason for rejection was surprisingly the opinion of the reviewer in the second revision. If that was the case, they could have rejected it directly after the second revision. Why did they reject it after I made the changes??

I am really fed up with such a trash journal and editor.

(6) 讚！ | will11

It's really slow. It took 4 months to give feedback, and after the minor repairs, it was directly held by the editor for another month.

(0) 讚！ | will11

Submitted on October 23, 2020, and then minor revision opinions was given on November 5th, minor revision was submitted on the 10th, and then the acceptance email received on the 11th. The whole process took 19 days, and the speed was really fast.

(5) 讚！ | 我我我

has been submitted for four and a half months, and there is no news yet, or under review......

(1) 讚！ | 苦苦等待

is too slow, submitted on the 10th of January, has been four months, and the results of the review have not been given.....No language

(0) 讚！ | 809216493@qq.com

Received 24 February 2014Received in revised form 14 May 2014Accepted 15 May 2014Available online 28 May 2014

(0) 讚！ | zhangxr_22745@163.com

6月18Submission June 25 Technical Review June 26 Submitted July 15 Rework July 22 Returned July 23 Receive

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

High requirements for rigor and reproducibility. 50 days to first decision.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Good quality journal

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Impurity full name: The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics

(0) 讚！ | 匿名