Real-time impact factor is a bit low, keep it up!

(0) 讚！ | 吉吉Archi

Congratulations! May I ask what is the sequence of changes in the status of the manuscript in JCIM?

(0) 讚！ | July_June

May I ask what the sequence of changes in the status of manuscripts in JCIM is?

(0) 讚！ | July_June

Just received the acceptance, the review speed is very fast, the editing is also good, the quality is very good, it feels like there may be an expansion of the issue, the acceptance rate is relatively high, everyone can give it a try, once again, thank you to the editors.

(0) 讚！ | sci发发发发发发

Great journal, very good in the field of mathematics

(0) 讚！ | 笑忘书老师

Submitted in 5 days, received first review comments in 23 days, revisions took nearly a month, and after submission, it took a total of 13 days to receive minor revisions

(3) 讚！ | 安61

Traditional CADD content, classic computation approach route. Submitted in August, received revised peer review comments in September, returned in October after one month of modifications, and received galley proof on October 12

(1) 讚！ | lirrui

Submitted for a month, received a rejection review consisting of a few sentences.

(1) 讚！ | jm

Submission October 20th
Major construction December 28th

(0) 讚！ | xstrongf

Hello, I would like to ask if it is necessary to submit code to submit to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | Nick

New Year's Eve submission, sent to external reviewers for over a week, underwent major revisions for a little over a month, with four reviewers providing feedback - three minor revisions and one rejection. The deadline was set for two months. After carefully addressing the issues raised by the reviewer who rejected the submission, the others also made their best efforts to revise it. It took almost two months for the editing process to be completed and finally submitted. Three weeks later, the submission was accepted, taking a total of about four months. It was fortunate that there were no further minor or major revisions required. The editor was very meticulous, even sending an email to inform us that the article had been sent to the reviewers after the revisions were returned. It was the first time, and although a bit anxious, it was still considered a pleasant submission experience.

(1) 讚！ | CandyClass

I submitted the manuscript. The comments of first review were given in 45 days, minor revision was required and 2 months was given. There were two under review experts and 12 review comments. It was submitted in 25 days after revision. The comments of second review were given in 14 days, minor revision was required and two weeks was given. At the beginning, two experts accepted it. The third expert showed up suddenly and gave 5 comments. I revised it for 3 days and submitted it. The comments of the editor were given in 7 days, the format and figures of the manuscript needed to be revised. I revised it for 2 days and submitted it. I submitted it at 4 pm, accepted manuscript email was received at 8 am on the next day. (The time difference was just right; the editor was very responsible.) 45 + 25 + 14 + 3 + 7 + 2 + 1 = 97days, 3 months. Enough innovations and workload are needed. Comprehensive comparison experiments and multiple data are needed. It focused on application; the repeat and codes are needed. I have no confidence in submitting it to Q1, but it is a pity to submit it to Q3, so Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling is very suitable to submit.

(17) 讚！ | Anonymous

After submitting the manuscript, the review comments submitted after 1 month, after the modification, directly accept

(0) 讚！ | huanyuchu@gmail.com

After submitting the manuscript, the review comments submitted after one month are directly accepted after the revision, and the requirements for innovation are a bit high.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Computer chemical-related journal with fewer algorithms and partial applications, such as the release of new software, third-party evaluation, etc. 1-3 months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名