KKKK2, I have a total of three reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 土豆泥 TDN

How many reviewers are there? It's been a long time for me too

(0) 讚！ | kkkk2

Finally accepted on 2023.12.11 after:
2023.10.29 major revision
2023.11.7 revised submitted to journal
2023.11.9 with editor
2023.11.17 under review
2023.12.3 Required Reviews Completed

(0) 讚！ | 土豆泥 TDN

October 29 major revision, three review comments, looking forward to good results after revision

(0) 讚！ | 土豆泥

Major revisions were made once, with feedback from three reviewers. There were quite a few issues and it was really difficult to make the changes.
Minor revisions were made once, with feedback from two reviewers. There were no major issues and it was accepted shortly after resubmission.
The process took about four to five months, but it was finally accepted

(0) 讚！ | Lemon_liuyu

My submission on 9/20 is still with editor, it's too slow

(0) 讚！ | kkkk2

Submission Guidelines: Papers must contain a maximum of 6000 words of text, no more than six tables or figures, and up to 30 references. I understand that the full text should not exceed 6000 words, excluding references. As of October 8, 2023, my paper is still under review

(0) 讚！ | 土豆泥

Hello, I was wondering if it can contain up to 6000 words including references?

(0) 讚！ | 皇哈哈

Oops~~~~ Latest news, got canceled

(0) 讚！ | 苦逼大田种地人

This is a classic magazine in the field of grains, but the review process is too slow. Submitted on 22nd February 2023; under review by editor on 18th March 2023; there were several changes during the review period. I sent two reminder letters at the end of June and August respectively, but there has been no substantial progress, so all I can do is wait

(0) 讚！ | 土豆泥

This should also be considered a classic crop science journal, but the reviewing process is incredibly slow! I submitted my manuscript on May 10th, inquired with the editor in July, found out there was one reviewer's comments, and now it's September, and it's still under review. Guess I'll keep waiting

(0) 讚！ | 苦逼大田种地人

Submitted in November 22nd, underwent major revisions in June, and returned the manuscript in July. It has been a month at the editor's without any changes, despite reminders. I'm not sure if it's because of the summer break, but it's really slow.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小陈努力

Can you reply to me, how much money do I ultimately need to pay?

(0) 讚！ | Ffion

How to choose an editor?

(0) 讚！ | ZSZS

May I please have Prof. John Taylor's contact information?

(0) 讚！ | 橘岛

Hello, may I ask if the email feedback after submission is returned to the communication department or to the first author? Where can I check it?

(0) 讚！ | 韶

It was submitted on May 8, review began on May 20, reviewing comments came out on June 10, requiring major revisions. The manuscript returned on July 10. On July 15 re-examination results came out, requiring minor revisions. The revised manuscript returned on July 21, it was received on July 22, and retrieved online on July 24. There is a DOI number. After proofreading, I am currently waiting for publication.

(2) 讚！ | YJCRS

The review speed was very fast and you can choose an editor. So Professor John Taylor was selected according to the recommendation of netizens. The result of the first review was issued within one month, requiring a major revision; I returned the revised manuscript within two days. I thought there would be a second external review, but I didn’t expect a direct acceptance; the proof stage lasted half a month after the acceptance, and it is currently to be published.

(1) 讚！ | Roseyman

2019.09.02 submission; 2019.10.02 four review comments returned, major revision required, questions answered without additional experimentation; 2019.10.04 revised submission; 2019.10.06 review comments returned. The editor-in-chief raised three minor issues and requested minor revisions. We returned it at noon that day. Then we received an email reminder of Sent to Production at 5:30 pm on 2019.10.06. This is the fastest time of my articles from submission to acceptance of about 35 days. The content is not deep, but I think it is very innovative, and the reviewers agree with the work. Thank you to my boss of the research group for your help in writing the article and replying to the review comments. After reading the boss's response, I felt it is awesome. The writing is very comfortable. There are requirements for the format of this journal, with no more than 5 figures and tables in total, and no more than 30 references. The laboratory has published three papers in the past two years, and another one is under review. This journal is fast.

(6) 讚！ | njrice

a week or reviewer invited

(0) 讚！ | ff

Prof John Taylor is very responsible for editing, and is very patient from submission to rework.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

Submitted to receive for less than two months, minor repairs received twice.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小萝卜

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is very strict. However, it is very efficient. High requirements for impact.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名