Leading domestic journals with high international influence. The review process is fast. The review comments are reasonable and effectively help streamline the article and improve its readability.

(0) 讚！ | 因心

Great journal! The editors and reviewers are very responsible.
8.2 Submission,
8.3 with editor
8.6 Initial review by editor completed, suggested formatting changes
8.8 Revision
8.10 Under review
8.17 Received initial review comments promptly, very efficient. Given twenty days for revisions.
9.6 Submitted revised manuscript on time.
9.14 Decision in process
9.23 Accepted
Overall, the efficiency is very high!

As it is a new journal, the editors are very focused on expanding academic impact, so more people can see the articles. Will definitely consider submitting good articles next time.

(0) 讚！ | r1se

APM is a domestically produced journal with high cost-effectiveness and recognition. It is relatively easy to submit papers, and it is also friendly to young teachers. As long as the quality of the paper is high, the review process is quick, and the online publication is also fast. The reviewers' opinions are very fair, and it takes about two weeks to receive the review comments. It takes about a month from submission to publication. Moreover, the double-blind review process is very fair and impartial.

(0) 讚！ | 不中Science誓不休

The Impact Factor of APM is over 28, a dark horse in domestic journals, and we look forward to its further development in the field. The overall submission process went smoothly, with the manuscript being sent for review within two to three days of submission. It may have been delayed slightly due to the summer vacation period, as the reviewers took longer than usual to provide feedback. It took about fifty days from submission to receiving the review comments. Once the review comments were received, the process of revising and resubmitting was relatively quick, with a turnaround time of around ten days from resubmission to acceptance. The entire process from submission to acceptance took about seventy days.

(0) 讚！ | 于璇001

The review speed of APM journal is very fast, and the comments given by the editors are very pertinent, which has greatly helped me improve the quality of the article. I hope that APM journal will continue to develop better and better.

(0) 讚！ | 喜欢喝可乐

Domestic journals with an impact factor of nearly 30 are very promising and worth investing in.

(0) 讚！ | kirov

The dark horse in domestic journals, the first IF is surprisingly over 28, which is very strong. I was lucky to have submitted an article, and there were 3-5 reviewers. The review period was very fast, just two or three days after submission, they notified me that it was under review. The reviewers all submitted their comments in less than ten days. After a round of major revisions, the paper was accepted. This journal has a great development prospect.

(1) 讚！ | 实验室值班人

September 29, receiving

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

The initial review speed of APM is very fast. I knew whether it was under review within 3 days of submission. I found five reviewers, and the manuscript status changed to major revision in about 10-14 days. The reviewers are very professional, both senior and junior researchers, and their comments are comprehensive and helpful for the article. The time from submission to acceptance is less than 40 days.

(1) 讚！ | 明月青瓦

9.24 决定正在进行中

Decision in process on 9.24

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

Decision in Process on September 18th.

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

September 15 under r

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

September 13 under r

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

September 10th, submit the revised version to the journal.

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

8.23 Overhaul
9.2 Submission of revisions to the journal
9.6 Submission of revisions to the journal

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

8.22 决定正在进行中

Decision in Process

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

Change of date to August 21.

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

Change of date to 8.19

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

I have submitted two papers to APM and both were eventually accepted for publication. Overall, APM is an excellent journal with a high IF of 28.6, positioning it as a top-tier journal in the country in the future, worthy of our submissions and trust. APM adopts a completely double-blind review system, unlike regular peer review, where reviewers cannot see any information about the authors, making the journal's work more objective and fair. The review process at APM is also very fast, with quick decisions on whether to send the paper for review, saving us time. The review comments received are also very professional, indicating the high level of expertise of the reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 熊普先---

8.16 under r date change.

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

8.13 under r date change

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

Please change the date to August 5th.

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

7.31以下

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

Sorry, the phrase "7.31 under r" does not have a clear meaning and cannot be translated accurately without more context.

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫

July 24 sub
July 25 with ed.

(0) 讚！ | 莫莫