Have you been hired, dear?

(0) 讚！ | 螳螂逸思

This paragraph should be translated into English and Japanese

(0) 讚！ | 天山元斐

This is the third week of the review process and it is still under review. It should be an external review, right?

(0) 讚！ | 小野寺雁菱

Focused research direction: Epidemiology 
Experience sharing: Any friends who have recently submitted articles? The journal requires anonymous submissions (omitting author and affiliation information in the title page). It has been one week since submission, and the status is "Under Review." Does this mean it has been sent for external review?

(0) 讚！ | 小野寺雁菱

How long does the whole submission process take, roughly? Could you please share the specific timeframes for each stage if possible?

(0) 讚！ | 硕阳君

The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC, or Pearson's r) is a widely used measure of linear correlation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Statistics generally calculates the P value obtained by the method of significance testing

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

How to Calculate Correlation?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

To memory the first article in my life as the first author~ Submitted in early March, revision comments received in late April, resubmitted in May, accepted in early July, and then a long technical review started. The format and images were modified over and over again... Their editors didn't do anything... It was required for images to be in an old format called EPS, which I had never heard of before. This article went through hardships and finally published online in early October~ The base of our group is in the United States. The content of the article is not good, and it was rejected by CEBP in a second. I am very happy to be able to publish on AJE! It seems that AJE's IF is also a little higher than CEBP, haha.

(2) 讚！ | Dr. Hedgehog

Rejected for a month and a half, the reviewer was very nice and pointed out very professional and valuable issues. Revised and resubmitted

(0) 讚！ | 四象辽源

Page fee: 700.0 Experience sharing: Submitted on May 9, 2020, and is Under Review on the 12th, looking forward to good news

(0) 讚！ | 四象辽源

The content of the submission may not be very relevant to the magazine; there are many colorful maps. Submitted in the evening, rejected in the middle of the night

(0) 讚！ | Zero Poe

Submission to this journal was my first ever. My manuscript was accepted with minor revisions. I was excited until later, at a conference, when my peers told me that this journal was less influential than the European Journal of Epidemiology, which has a much higher impact factor.

(0) 讚！ | Hai

is difficult, nearly threeIn the past year, I submitted 4 articles to this journal, and I recently contributed 1 article.

(0) 讚！ | lyfylxp@gmail.com

It was quite difficult. I submitted to this journal four times in the past three years, and finally got one article published recently

(0) 讚！ | 桃花秋梓

Epidemic top ace journal!More difficult than other epidemiological journals.

(1) 讚！ | davidfuzming@163.com

Epidemic Top Ace Magazine! Harder to publish than other epidemic magazines

(0) 讚！ | 孤云梓露

Unknown, so submit to rejection. 3 weeks of initial review Status has been under review from start to rejection.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

For unknown reasons, the submission was under review for 3 weeks in the initial screening stage before being rejected

(0) 讚！ | Mabel Hewlett

The submission was made on November 16, 2015, and it has been under review since then until January 5, 2016. Feeling anxious, waiting

(0) 讚！ | 暴风星河

Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: Submitted on October 20, 2015, rejected on November 9, 2015. Initial review took 3 weeks. The status was "under review" from the beginning until the rejection

(0) 讚！ | 东京红卫

This magazine seems to have been submitted without being reviewed by the editor, and is now under review

(0) 讚！ | 明冠艳苹

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted for review after one week, then received decision email after three weeks. One reviewer was very strict, pointing out issues with professional methods and language, and suggested rejection; while the other reviewer commented that the overall article was "well done" and offered some constructive feedback. The journal has high quality standards for articles and the editing process is efficient. Although the submission was rejected, the experience gained was valuable

(0) 讚！ | 一阳乐琴

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: The revision process took a long time, more than 2 months. During this period, the editor sent an apology email, basically stating that the review progress was delayed due to one reviewer's feedback not being received. After apologizing, they asked me to be patient and said they would provide the results in one or two weeks. The review comments were very fair, and both reviewers were very diligent. I received the feedback in less than two weeks after submission

(0) 讚！ | 九阳从萍