Medical Physics sub-journals. Overall, the submission quality is quite good and most articles will receive revisions. They do not emphasize innovation or principles very much, as they have seen many submissions that are disorganized. It is important to approach them with a critical eye.

(0) 讚！ | luciaa

How long does the first review of this magazine take?

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏俊力

How long will it take to get a response? I'm so worried

(0) 讚！ | 晓博大叔

Hello, do you send an email to the author after submitting a contribution? How long after will you notify whether the submission format is accepted?

(0) 讚！ | 晓博大叔

Introduction includes a few of the following aspects: introduction to the background, significance, current status (shortcomings) of the research field, the purpose of this study, and a brief overview of the research content

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

When describing your innovative points, you should focus on describing the shortcomings of past research, and fully and clearly describe your solution ideas. Innovation requires the use of introductory techniques, so it is beneficial to include more content that is advantageous to yourself. In order to highlight the innovation of your research, it is necessary to select references that can highlight the differences and characteristics of your research among numerous citations. For example: (1) time issues; (2) research methods; (3) research areas; (4) uncertainties; (5) proposing hypotheses for verification

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What should be written in an introduction?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

How is the innovation of the article reflected in the introduction?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

Hello, may I ask which editing companies are recommended in this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | Eli Bloor

Hello~ May I ask which editing companies are recommended in this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 东风文景

Trashy magazines, not good

(0) 讚！ | Agnes Saul

It's not perfect, as long as I can graduate, my senior brother published a paper last year, he also successfully graduated, so everything is fine

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Three months after submission, I was informed to change the website and resubmit. After that, I resubmitted multiple times with incorrect formats. Two months later, it was directly rejected. It's been more than half a year since the rejection

(0) 讚！ | Agnes Saul

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0 Experience Sharing: It took a total of 2 months from submission to acceptance, with three reviewers who provided very constructive feedback, pointing out the shortcomings of the article. The experts were also very helpful in revising the language for free. It took 2 days to make revisions and respond to the reviewers' comments, and 3 days later I received an email confirming acceptance for publication. The efficiency was quite high.  Recommendation: I personally believe that studies related to clinical models are more easily accepted in this journal

(0) 讚！ | 一只德鑫呀

is good, free of print, not the

(0) 讚！ | 匿名