Hello, may I ask how the final result turned out for you?

(0) 讚！ | 朱惠会

12.24 Christmas Eve delivery
02.14 Valentine's Day feedback
03.05 Submit revision
03.13 Feedback return (Rest on Saturday and Sunday as it was submitted on Friday)
03.16 Submit revision
03.19 Accept ABP

(0) 讚！ | meiyushih

Submitted on November 28, 2023
First review returned on March 10, 2024
Two reviewers, one agreed to publish, and the other couldn't find anyone to review it from the editorial board. The outcome was that there were too many references to other journals, with only one reference to JAAS. My research is on lightning spectroscopic analysis, so it is not suitable for JAAS. They suggested that I transfer my submission to RSC Advance

(2) 讚！ | COOL0111

Submitted on February 4th, the editor on the 9th said that the submission did not match the journal, I didn't expect it to come back so quickly

(0) 讚！ | luckstone

May I know how many reviewers have been invited and how many of them have agreed to review?

(0) 讚！ | COOL0111

Isotopic geochronology data processing software, submitted on November 20th, received the first review result on December 30th. It required major revisions, which were submitted ten days later. Minor revisions were made on January 25th and accepted on January 26th. It has been published, and the editorial processing speed was very fast. It was difficult for me to find reviewers in this field initially. Several reviewers rejected the invitation, but eventually, I found two reviewers, one rejected and one accepted. After the third reviewer was found by the editor, they agreed to the modifications. Although it was a complicated process, the publication went smoothly in the end. The reviewers' comments were indeed helpful and significantly improved the quality of the paper. Apart from the reviewer who rejected it, the other two reviewers provided similar suggestions from a professional perspective.

(0) 讚！ | tree9527

07-Apr-2021   Submission
13-May-2021   Major revision
20-Jul-2021   Acceptance
10-Aug-2021   Proofreading
The process methods and testing of metal isotopes were performed. Overall, the experience was quite good, and there was editorial assistance for polishing during the review process.

(4) 讚！ | 一给我里giao

The manuscript was submitted at the beginning of July 2020, it has been one month now, and the current status is switching between With editor and In peer review. Two days ago, it is still in In peer review, but today it is With editor. It's a long story!

(0) 讚！ | jtostrich

I was replied in a month, and major revision was required. The speed was very fast. There were 2 reviewers. Three days after submission, it was accepted.

(2) 讚！ | 浩1987

The review and rejection speed are very fast in this journal. I submitted to this journal twice within two years, one was rejected after one month and one was accepted after a major revision. There are certain requirements for the novelty of the article, and the editor is not very strict with the language. It is recommended to submit if it is an article with certain innovation. It should be noted that the time for revision and confirmation of materials are limited. I remember that it should be 72 hours, and you need to be aware of it.

(2) 讚！ | 中烨

This is an atomSpectral analysis compares professional journals with high requirements for innovation and language. The number of articles is now less and less. IF is also decreasing, but the rejection rate is still very high.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I selectd in the first ten days of last year, and returned to the overhaul opinion after 40 days. It took about 20 days to modify it and repaired it after 3 days.The speed of RSC is generally faster.Although JAAS is the authoritative journal of atomic spectrum analysis, it seems that there are not many sources, and the impact factor may decrease year by year.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The quality of the article is uneven. In recent years, the subject of partial isotope analysis is preferred. The editor is more tolerant and the language is not good enough. As long as there is new idea, it will give an opportunity to submit a review.I had one of the last year, four reviews, which lasted 11 months and finally accepted.As long as the article has new ideas, I suggest you can try this publication. The editor is still relatively friendly to the Chinese.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is the top journal in the field of atomic spectroscopy. I recently received two papers.Personal feelings must have a certain accumulation.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Innovation requirements are high. The review speed is very fast, and the reviewer comments are returned within a month. 2 reviewers. Careful revisions are required. The editor is very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

There must be more clear innovation points, the editor is very responsible, and the review draft is more efficient. Generally, within two months, more than two months, the editor will send an email.The speed of revision of the revised manuscript and other materials is required to be higher.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名