Already Submitted

(0) 讚！ | 我有一个roey

How long does the "pending approval" status usually last? Approximately, how long does it take to receive the review comments?

(0) 讚！ | 还得努力

May I ask how long the "pending approval" status has been maintained? How long does it usually take for the review comments to be received?

(0) 讚！ | 还得努力

The submission is a review article, and the expert opinions are generally positive. The review process is considered to be of average duration.

(0) 讚！ | 北博

Excuse me, how long does the status "Pending Approval" usually last? It has been about 3 weeks for me, but I still haven't received the first round of review comments. Is this situation normal?

(0) 讚！ | 还得努力

Excuse me, has the blogger's submission status changed? Ah, it's been almost two months and it's still submitted.

(0) 讚！ | paperdd

I would like to ask everyone who has submitted, what is the status after submitting? After I finished submitting, I couldn't find any status, it only shows as a draft. I haven't been able to figure out if I have actually submitted or not.

(0) 讚！ | 一个哒卟柳

Have you experienced a quality review?

(0) 讚！ | 月光林地

2022.10.07 Submission
2022.11.28 Major revision, two reviewers, 10 comments.
2022.12.29 Major revision, one reviewer approved, another expert has one comment remaining.
2023.01.26 Accepted.
The review process was decent, but sometimes it becomes troublesome when dealing with meticulous experts. Also, the APC fee of $2550 for open access in Zone 4 is a bit expensive.

(0) 讚！ | 逸仙888

Did you receive any email regarding integrity and quality survey before accepting? It has been almost a month since the major revision and return. The journal now says that there were issues with the previous peer review and requires additional review. They also mentioned that the revised manuscript had a change in authors and asked for an author's statement. They even asked if I wanted to withdraw the paper... Does this mean they don't want this article?

(0) 讚！ | 怕冷星人

Posted on March 18th, I used the QQ journal submission email to send a verification email to the organization. There were also many details in between. On March 24th, the official submission was successful. On May 2nd, I sent a reminder, and on May 5th, one reviewer returned with comments. On May 16th, the editor requested major revisions (there was only one reviewer). On June 6th, I submitted the revised manuscript. On July 1st, the journal emailed me saying that they found issues with the previous peer review process and required additional peer reviews. They also asked if I wanted to withdraw the submission. Additionally, when I submitted the revised version, I added two new authors and changed the corresponding author. The journal also stated that if I choose not to withdraw the submission, I need to provide an author statement. It's exhausting... Has anyone encountered this situation before? Please let me know what the journal means now.

(0) 讚！ | 怕冷星人

The review speed is relatively fast, but the time for submission is too long.
Submitted--20210820
AE INVITED--20210916
Submitted--20210923
AE INVITED--20211014
AE Assigned--20211022
Under Review--20211029
Pending Approval--20211112
Minor Revision Requested--20211121
Under Review--20211129
Accept--20211210

(4) 讚！ | ophoenixo

I have been waiting for nearly 6 months, and I have reminded them twice. It's too slow and disgusting.

(1) 讚！ | yangqh

If you plan to take the academic route for a long time, don’t submit to it. Like IEEE ACCESS and Sensors, the reputation is not very good and there are too many related connections and some very valueless or even a bit shoddy articles. It is a bit embarrassing to write them on the resume, and many college recruitments don't recognize these. I haven't submitted to it, but I can't leave a message without choosing a yes.

(6) 讚！ | Andrea Goldsmith

The review comments on the manuscript were fairly pertinent, which was quite good. 2020.1.20 Submission; 2020.5.13 A notification of revision was received (Major Revision); 2020.5.25 Returned the revised manuscript; 2020.7.8 Directly accepted.

(4) 讚！ | 随心的白鹭

Submission on June 22, review comments given on October 9, but it was rejected. The comments said that it did not conform to the journal. The journal mainly focuses on the theoretical research on transportation. During the period, three editor-in-chiefs were changed, and the last one rejected the manuscript. I waited for more than three months. I will not submit to this journal anymore. It’s too slow, and it feels uncomfortable to waste such a long time.

(4) 讚！ | 大白

When Wiley published, 50~60 papers were published every year, now published by HINDAWI, and more than 200 articles in 2018

(0) 讚！ | ccqq

First trial within 3 months, then 1 monthInternal second trial, revised after the use of

(1) 讚！ | 热心网友

Fast. One month for the first review.

(3) 讚！ | martinet

Journal Homepage URL: http://http://onlinelibrary.wile ... 002/(ISSN)2042-3195

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Canadian journal, now Wiley published,Not bad, not easy to select in

(0) 讚！ | 匿名