The review process is too slow, especially during the summer. It's been two months and still no news.

(0) 讚！ | 135467841321

Hello, may I ask if it is normal for my manuscript to be in the "with editor" status for a week without any feedback for revisions? Should I send an email to the editor to inquire about the situation?

(0) 讚！ | 韩颖涛

Hello, I would like to inquire about my revised manuscript status, which has been showing as "with editor" for a week now. Is this normal? Should I send an email to the editor to ask about the status?

(0) 讚！ | 韩颖涛

Submitted on April 15, 2023, first revision on May 12, submission in early July; second revision on July 29, submission on September 10. Accepted in early October. The review process was fast, and the reviewers were very diligent and meticulous

(0) 讚！ | LieutenantM

4.17 Submit manuscript
5.26 Receive minor revisions
7.9 Upload revised manuscript
7.24 Request to change a duplicate reference, language editing
8.2 Receive
8.2 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 大牛和水仙

25 May 2023 - Manuscript Submitted
29 May 2023 - With Editor
31 May 2023 - Out for Review
11 July 2023 - Reviews Complete
11 July 2023 - Decision Pending
24 July 2023 - Revision Required
27 July 2023 - Revision Incomplete
27 July 2023 - Revised Manuscript Submitted
27 July 2023 - With Journal Administrator
27 July 2023 - With Editor
28 July 2023 - Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 赵崇康

31 October 2022
With Editor
31 October 2022
Out for Review
01 January 2023
Reviews Complete
02 January 2023
Decision Pending
03 January 2023
Revision Required
18 February 2023
Revision Incomplete
18 February 2023
Revised Manuscript Submitted
18 February 2023
With Journal Administrator
20 February 2023
With Editor
20 February 2023
Out for Review
23 April 2023
Reviews Complete
23 April 2023
Decision Pending
23 April 2023
Accepted

Reviewer is slow, editor is fast!

(0) 讚！ | ilex

Hello, may I ask if this journal requires every author to verify their submission through email after it is submitted?

(0) 讚！ | 小智哥

Hello, may I ask if this journal requires every author to verify their submission through email after submitting?

(0) 讚！ | 小智哥

Hello, where can I check the status of the manuscript? Is it only accessible for the corresponding author to login and view?

(0) 讚！ | IF重要吗

The review process is quite long, approximately three months, which may be due to difficulty in finding reviewers. The editor is very responsible and responds promptly to any questions, but if you need a quick online publication, it is not recommended to submit to this journal.

(2) 讚！ | 州桥明月

A very good journal, with two reviewers, received the first round of comments in about a month. After modifications, it was accepted directly in about twenty days. The speed is relatively fast.

(1) 讚！ | 66浩公路

Submitted at the end of February, under review approximately one week later. Then under review again for about two weeks. One month later, the expert provided feedback, which took over a month to make minor revisions. After submitting the revised manuscript, it was accepted in less than a month. The whole process took four months, with one month spent on revisions. It took the journal approximately three months to review and accept the manuscript. It is suggested to carefully address the questions and comments from the expert when receiving the feedback. The speed of the journal's response was quite fast.

(1) 讚！ | 阳光

Received a notice for major revisions one month after submission, with a two-month time frame for modifications. Received feedback for minor revisions one week after uploading the revised manuscript, but there were hardly any comments. Only had to make some adjustments to grammar and include references to two additional articles. Overall, I have a positive impression of this journal, even though it is classified as a fourth-tier journal, it is still a reputable one.

(3) 讚！ | 小涛

Hello, may I ask how long does it take for the first review? I have been waiting for over a month and it is still under review.

(0) 讚！ | 一脱叶子

After reading several articles from JAST, I felt they were satisfactory. I decided to give it a try and submitted my work for review. There were two reviewers, one of whom was relatively fair and provided around ten suggestions, while the other rejected my submission but gave twenty suggestions. After being rejected, I made revisions and submitted it to another journal.

(6) 讚！ | 小猪博士

If you are not in a hurry, it is not recommended to submit. It is a waste of data. As a reviewer, I feel that a journal of this kind of level is only to meet the needs. It is actually not an academic one.

(11) 讚！ | 锤子！

Reviewed for about 1 month.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Lightning speed, I didn’t know that this journal needs every author to enter the submission system verification through his own mailbox, so I have not sent it for review for a while. After confirming it, I will review it.It took a week, it seems that it is not there, there is only one reviewer, the opinion is minor repair, and the two days after the change.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Initial Date Submitted: Oct 27, 2011Status Date:Oct 18, 2012 Current Status:Completed AcceptDate Final Disposition Set:Oct 18, 2012Final Disposition:Accept

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

SuggestedWelding of metal materials, friction welding, pressure welding, explosion welding, etc. Other journals have not accepted papers for this journal, and the recruitment rate is very high, accepted one month.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名