The main task of the introduction is to outline the basic content and structure of the entire text for the author. It is important to comprehensively summarize the past and present situation in the field, especially the latest developments and references to classic literature from the past. Analyze the limitations of past research and clarify the innovative points of one's own research

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The content of the introduction is arranged in three to four levels of paragraphs

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to write an introduction?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

How many paragraphs are generally included in an introduction?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Classic journals in the field of botany, with a history of over a hundred years, publish approximately 150 articles per year. The rejection rate is around 80-85%. The initial review process is relatively fast, with feedback for major revisions provided within two to three months. After submitting the revised manuscript, minor revisions are typically requested within a month. It takes another month for the revised manuscript to be accepted. The publication process is slow, with online publication occurring six months after acceptance. Both the editor-in-chief and the associate editor encountered during the submission process were very helpful. The overall communication throughout the submission process was very pleasant.

(0) 讚！ | 米开朗基罗

Has anyone submitted recently? Can you share your experience?

(0) 讚！ | 赶路的人

Minor repair.

(1) 讚！ | matthew

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: Minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | 雪梦公子

Can I ask if the review process is fast?

(0) 讚！ | 文德小姐姐

Just submitted an article. Hope it gets accepted!

(0) 讚！ | 虎鹤英悟

Just submitted an article, hoping it will be accepted!

(0) 讚！ | Werner MacPherson

Can it be strengthened?

(0) 讚！ | 塞缪尔兰斯洛特

3分边缘，希望能维持稳定，略有上升也不错。

：
3 points ahead, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase would also be nice

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The review process is too slow

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: My first submission, the editor and reviewer were both very careful and attentive. It was rejected, but I have made revisions and resubmitted. Currently under review

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0. Sharing of experiences: The magazine has a very good reputation, the editor is very responsible, especially the editor of plant biochemistry technology, who is very dedicated and communicates well. The review process is fast, with a first review cycle of 29 days and feedback for major revisions given within one week. The tentative accept feedback typically involves minor details and layout adjustments, with a request for revisions within ten days. The revised version is accepted the next day. A very fast and responsible magazine. Great!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The section for primer has been separated, other categories are not good for submission anymore~ It has been taken advantage of by more than fifty articles in 12 years

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Why can't the impact factor of this journal increase?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The molecular direction is relatively fast, while the others are very slow

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Next year we should be able to reach third place

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Can we score 3 points next year? Let's discuss it

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Which direction are you leaning towards?

(0) 讚！ | 中原诗蕊

My article was accepted, it depends on whether the logic is good. As long as the logic is clear and the reasoning is well explained, it should be accepted without difficulty. Of course, it also depends on whether there is an interesting phenomenon. The more interesting it is, the clearer it should be explained, the better

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

They for a period of time did not accept articles from China due to someone's reasons

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Is this acceptable in the end? Please let me know if you are aware

(0) 讚！ | 中原诗蕊