Hello OP, I am currently a junior editor. The reviewers have no comments, but the associate editor has provided six notes, some of which require me to make highlighted changes in the manuscript. I would like to ask if I still need to write a response letter addressing each note and if the submitted version should include the highlighted changes.

(0) 讚！ | Tong_Y66

Do you mean that this Highlights file should be uploaded as a separate document in the submission system, following the guidelines of 3-5 key points, each not exceeding 85 characters?

(0) 讚！ | jasmine

Um, shouldn't uploading highlights be done in the submission system?

(0) 讚！ | Shaoxun

Hello author, I have encountered a problem now. My paper has been accepted by the reviewers, but the editor keeps saying that I have not uploaded the Highlights file. Do I need to upload this separately? There is a link in the submission portal for "Highlights (for review)". Should I upload the Highlights file directly there? I am looking forward to your reply, as this is my only chance. If I still upload it incorrectly, my paper will be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | jasmine

There were 6 reviewers, 2 of whom provided some suggestions for revisions. 3 were very positive and even accepted the suggestions. Only the most annoying one raised some trivial issues, denying all the work and the whole world. The editor directly rejected it, and the other reviewers were all in agreement. Only that reviewer was picky. If he can only understand 1+1=2, I have nothing to say. I have already accepted the rejection and will write a letter to battle this nuisance.

(3) 讚！ | 真猪乃猹_

During the revision process, the number of reviewers accepting and completing the review in the peer review status has always been zero, but the date changed twice. I did not send any reminder emails, so I assume the associate editor responsible for the review is handling it themselves.

(0) 讚！ | Tan_2001

Xiao Xiu is the only reviewer who returned feedback on time. Did you have to remind the others?

(1) 讚！ | 神奇小狗

Little Xiu has been studying for a month and has made great progress.

(0) 讚！ | Tan_2001

November 2, 2024 Minor edits; requested plagiarism check and submission of declaration. Returned on the same day, still no results to date...

(0) 讚！ | Shaoxun

Updated
Some images were deleted, margins were reduced, and the manuscript was shortened to thirty pages, and the editor was informed of the changes.
11.2 accept
It's not easy, 18 reviewers in two years, be cautious when submitting in a hurry
The first review will definitely have four or five reviewers, as long as one has a negative opinion it's dangerous, one rejection from four in the same research group means rejection
I have one acceptance for every four revisions, one direct acceptance, given major revisions, in addition, second and third reviewers will disappear, and the editor will cast the net again, finding several more reviewers is really painful
Be cautious when submitting in a hurry, be cautious, be cautious

(0) 讚！ | Monet 123

The complete process is as follows, hoping for a good outcome.....
1. Submitted 2024.06.29
2. Under Review 2024.07.05
3. Under Review(3*completed) 2024.08.02
4. Major Revision 2024.08.16
5. Revision Submitted 2024.09.09
6. With Editor 2024.09.09
7. Return to author 2024.09.10
8. Resubmitted 2024.09.19
9. Under Review 2024.10.19
10. Required Reviews Complete 2024.10.28
11. Decision in Process 2024.10.30

(0) 讚！ | Shaoxun

There are a total of 6 major revisions, 4 of which have been approved, while the remaining 2 have not yet provided feedback within the specified timeframe.

(0) 讚！ | Tan_2001

Hello, may I ask what method you are using for plagiarism checking?

(0) 讚！ | 知1

Has Elsevier invited reviewers in the mini-program again? I heard that this journal must have at least four reviewers. How many reviewers have you had before in total?

(0) 讚！ | yuxi696

It has been a month already, and it is still under review.

(0) 讚！ | Tan_2001

The final submitted manuscript was requested by the associate editor to be limited to 30 pages, but the revised manuscript has already exceeded 30 pages by a significant amount. What should we do in this situation?

(0) 讚！ | TETSHIWO

I have also encountered this problem. Have you solved it?

(0) 讚！ | TETSHIWO

Brother, have you received a reply? Just when I asked for a plagiarism check, you started inviting again.

(0) 讚！ | yuxi696

It took nearly four months for the first review to be completed, with six reviewers involved.

(0) 讚！ | kyle11

May I ask if you know which email to send to?

(0) 讚！ | Ayo97

Could you please tell me what the Outlook email address is?

(0) 讚！ | Ayo97

Does anyone know if having double spacing for over 30 pages will have any impact? The editing during the minor revisions stage requires us to follow the author guidelines for formatting, but the manuscript has already exceeded 30 pages and there is no way to reduce it.

(0) 讚！ | Monet 123

This journal is simply too slow, and there are too many reviewers, so submit your manuscript carefully.

(0) 讚！ | Alin

After revising, the reviewers will need to review it again, and the editor may invite other reviewers. You will have to wait patiently for the manuscript to enter the review process again, so please be patient.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

It's really messing with my mind after getting rejected for so long.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666