After one month of submission, the revised version was submitted. A major revision was given 90 days, with a request for a 2-week extension. The revised version was sent to two reviewers and the Associate Editor on the same day, and was accepted after waiting for more than twenty days.

(0) 讚！ | 羊驼哒哒哒

May I ask how long it takes to assign a reviewer? I have submitted my paper for two weeks now, and it has been 12 days since the associate editor was assigned, but there has been no update

(0) 讚！ | hellohi

The first trial lasted nearly 2 months. After major renovations, the return was smooth. The second trial was completed in just 11 days, and it was also received smoothly.

(3) 讚！ | inker

Copied from: Just look at the publication situations of the journals in a specific field. Experts in some fields value professional journals in that field. Some journals seem to have low impact factors, but they are top in their specific fields. For example, IOVS in ophthalmology, has an IF of only 3 or 4. But if a scientist engaged in ophthalmology research does not have a certain number of articles published on it, he/she may not be valued by peers in this field, even if he/she has lots of articles in some good multidisciplinary journals.

(0) 讚！ | EYE

Transfer from: See the publication of journals in specific fields.Experts in some fields value professional journals in the field.Some journals seem to have low impact factors, but they are top-notch in their specific fields, such as IOVS in ophthalmology, although only 3~4, but a scientist who is engaged in ophthalmology research does not have a certain number of articles on it, even if he has someGeneral's articles in good journals may not be valued by peers in this field.

(0) 讚！ | EYE

IOVS authority; reviewer professional rigorously; the best journal for basic research in ophthalmology, researchers in this field must have masterpieces on IOVS to be recognized by the industry.

(0) 讚！ | EYE

The leader in ophthalmology. In addition to an EBM, there are two reviewers, and dozens of opinions are provided. It is indeed helpful to improve the quality of the article, and the reviewer was also very straightforward. The review was very fast, the results were given in just a few weeks, and the second review was given in only a few days. It was accepted in 4 months.

(12) 讚！ | 蓝枫叶

The leader of the ophthalmology basic journal, made a lot of comments, very rigorous journal.The review is relatively fast, and the overall journal is a more responsible journal. It is very rigorous. It will be published in the past seven months. If the experiment is not included in the middle, it will be published in four months.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous