The article took nearly six months to complete and is finally ready to be shared with everyone

(1) 讚！ | 金3201

The host's reviews are very accurate and on point!

(57) 讚！ | 科研大佬。

Writing a short paper in the style of a long paper, with very few changes in the suggestions made, isn't it just so many revisions?

(0) 讚！ | KKT AND ADMM

2022.1.20 submit
2022.2.19 minor revisions
2022.3.21 resubmit
2022.4.20 accept

(3) 讚！ | 阿阿大宝

12.15 Decision Pending

(0) 讚！ | 0103.

Why is it being submitted for review so many times?

(0) 讚！ | 0103.

2023.4.3 submitted
2023.5.26 with editor
2023.7.8 out for review
2023.9.24 out for review
2023.10.3 out for review
2023.12.1 out for review

(0) 讚！ | wangmu

10.14 out for review

(0) 讚！ | 0103.

10.12 Out for review

(0) 讚！ | 0103.

Has it been accepted directly under review for 3 months?

(0) 讚！ | 0103.

The article has been accepted

(0) 讚！ | 心沉大海

10.8 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 0103.

2023.10.4 With Journal Administrator

(0) 讚！ | 0103.

The review process of this journal is very fast. I submitted my paper at the end of 2022 and received the first review result by the end of April 2023, which took only 5 months. I would like to especially commend the editor of this journal, who is very diligent. They found 9 reviewers who rigorously reviewed the paper. The 9 reviewers provided 38 comments, and the Associate Editor (AE) also provided a very professional comment, which ultimately stated: "You are of course now free to submit the paper elsewhere should you choose to do so." The positioning of this journal is very accurate. In the field of control science, it is on par with journals like TAC and Automatica. It is highly recommended for everyone to submit their papers to this journal. I wish the journal continued success!

(9) 讚！ | 小强

Hello, I would like to ask if there are any recommended control-related journals with short submission cycles? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | lfj0101

Sep. 25, 2022. Submitted
Oct. 10, 2022. With Editor
Oct. 30, 2022. Out for review
Nov. 28, 2022. Decision pending
Dec. 04, 2022. Revision required (major revision)
Jan. 31, 2023. Submitted
Feb. 20, 2023. Decision pending
Feb. 26, 2023. Accepted

September 25, 2022. Submitted
October 10, 2022. With Editor
October 30, 2022. Out for review
November 28, 2022. Decision pending
December 04, 2022. Revision required (major revision)
January 31, 2023. Submitted
February 20, 2023. Decision pending
February 26, 2023. Accepted

(0) 讚！ | Anthony_BUAA

Hello, may I ask if there are any requirements for the length of the article?

(0) 讚！ | xumengaaaa

It is extremely slow, I have been submitting for three months, and there is no news at all. It has been under review the whole time. I will never submit to this journal again.

(0) 讚！ | 心沉大海

Oct-2021: submit
Nov-2021: major revision
Feb-2022: major revision
Jun-2022: accept

(1) 讚！ | TSERROF

After waiting for nearly two months, the review comments returned to the editor-in-chief. It is estimated that the editor-in-chief must deal with a lot of manuscripts, and we haven’t received the result yet.

(3) 讚！ | winnerche

Submitted: 23-Sep-2019; Under review: 24-Sep-2019. The status has kept until now. During the period, I urged administrator. The administrator said very tactfully, saying that she couldn’t control the review speed of the reviewers. The first review speed of this journal was a bit slow.

(4) 讚！ | winnerche

It is a very good and rigorous journal which is worth being submitted to. The first review lasted 8 months and major revision was required. The second review lasted 4 months and the minor revision was required. The reviewers gave many detailed suggestions.

(0) 讚！ | Chris

Submitted on December 7, 2017, a reminder letter was sent in the middle;On July 9th, 2018, the reviewers received three reviewers, a total of 14 opinions, and the opinions were relatively pertinent. Some of them were indeed not considered in the paper, and the editors gave the overhaul;On August 8, 2018, return the repaired version and review comments;On September 16, 2018, the paper was accepted directly; the three reviewers did not give an opinion.Accept (16-Sep-2018)Major Revision (09-Jul-2018)

(1) 讚！ | 微雨星辰

Very slow and cautious review. 3 months. 2 months for the second review. The review comments are very meticulous and serious, and they are important for improving the article. Raised my opinion of the overall quality and rigor of the journal.

(5) 讚！ | 汤姆

The review is too slow, and often no reviewers can be found. The reviewers who have found the opinions are very strict. This is only the middle and lower journals in the three districts.District, Khan

(0) 讚！ | no name