- Submitted on December 1st last year, under review before Christmas
- Major revisions were given in July this year, revised and uploaded in early September, and accepted in October
- Only revised once in total, the ideas matched the magazine in my opinion

(1) 讚！ | 好结果.

- The whole process takes 10 months, with two major revisions. It usually takes about 2 months to get results after each submission.
- The opinions of the two reviewers are very helpful in improving the quality of the article.

(0) 讚！ | 小猫去写论文

I myself am also a reviewer, and I do not recommend submitting to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | frankliuuk

Not recommended to submit articles to this publication, as the peer review process is not very professional. In the field of supply chain management.

(2) 讚！ | frankliuuk

Posted on April 30, 2022, accepted on January 10, 2023!

(1) 讚！ | 在学术的道路上追寻！

Posted on April 30, 2022, retired on June 17, 2022. The review process was very fast!

(1) 讚！ | 在学术的道路上追寻！

Reviewed, Decision in process, Praying...

(0) 讚！ | 沙与风的边缘

More than half a month after it was submitted, it has always been with editor. Is it the same for everyone else?

(1) 讚！ | 沙与风的边缘

The review speed is extremely slow, and the first review was rejected after 7 months. One reviewer said that the innovation was not enough. Another reviewer pointed out some problems of proof, but it was just he did not understand. . . . . In short, too speechless.

(0) 讚！ | nobody12

Speed ​​is not normal Slow!

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

There are four reviewers, the review is very strict, the cycle is very long, and my initial review took nearly 8 months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

can't find reviewers at first, recommend reviewers for more than nine months, only one trial result, directly rejected

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review is very slow, the first trial is about 7 months, the result minor revision

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

review is too slow.A total of one and a half years.The letter was sent every six months.When I sent the second reminder, I said that there was a reviewer and I did not find a second reviewer.At the third reminder, I found a reviewer and asked him to finish the review as soon as possible.Then, within a few days, I received a rejection letter.The first reviewer has 2 pages of review comments, very detailed, more appreciative of the model and conclusions, and some major revisions in the introduction, literature and conclusions.The second reviewer is a little irresponsible. There are 1/3 pages of opinions, and some of the review comments are that we have not made it clear here and there, and some of the review comments are not correct.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Invest in Canada (North American Editor), in March, accepted in September.Returning to the country to select, did not return to the first round of opinions in 18 months.无语

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

submitted a special issue in October last year, submitted on October 14th, this year, January 23 shows the end of the review, and on February 5th the editor gave the opinion, overhaul, still very fast

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Long review and some editors are very irresponsible. There was no news for two years (finally retracted and re-submitted to another journal, accepted within six months). Submitted later for a special issue. Tried numerous forms of contact with zero reply.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find .../505647/description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Time is difficult in the

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

reviewing is very slow...

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

used to be a very general journal.Recently, the IJPE impact factor has risen a lot, but the recognition is still not comparable to other good operational and management journals.The editor is very responsible now. I heard that there have been a lot of submissions recently, and I hope that the quality can be improved.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

IJPE ranked third in the field of operational management.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名