Differences between HIGHLIGHTS and Abstract: Composed of several key words, does not need to be complete sentences; more concise and fewer words; HIGHLIGHTS only include important findings, while abstracts include key points such as research objectives and research methods

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

By summarizing the research subjects, materials sources, methods, and techniques used, readers can understand how this study was conducted. Therefore, the abstract must describe the methods employed

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the difference between Abstract and HIGHLIGHTS?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Does the abstract need to describe the methods used?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒阳平

Does anyone know what the status date is updated for?

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃玉华

Have you received the revised manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃玉华

May I ask if you received the summary? 
d.c 2018-06-03 17:36:00 post: The first trial took four months. It may have changed the reviewer in the middle. Personally, I feel the requirements are quite strict. The comments made by the reviewer were also very constructive. I answered truthfully bit by bit. Two days after returning it, it was accepted. Very unexpected. My first SCI paper. Happy

(0) 讚！ | 气甲韦曲

It has been 2 months since I submitted my manuscript, and it is still under review. I am getting anxious!

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄幼柏

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The first review took four months. There may have been a change in the reviewer midway. Personally, I feel the requirements are quite strict. The reviewer's comments were also very constructive. I answered truthfully to all points raised. The acceptance came just two days after resubmission. It was a pleasant surprise. My first SCI paper. Very happy

(0) 讚！ | 雨莲三岁啦

My status is also under review

(0) 讚！ | 黑山壬午

Submitted 50 days ago. Still under review

(0) 讚！ | 天神院听安

It's okay, as long as I can graduate. My senior brother published a paper last year, which also counts as a successful graduation, so everything will be fine

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

I published two papers in this journal in 2014. The journal has strict review standards, especially for clinical articles. It often requires approval from experts in English-speaking countries such as the UK, USA, Germany, and France in order to be published. Furthermore, the arguments in clinical articles must be approved by experts from various countries

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0
Sharing experience: I submitted an article in early February 2014, and one week later it was under review. It has been two months now, and it is still in the review process. I am looking forward to good news

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

I plan to submit an article and hope for good luck

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Good magazine, initial review for 3 months, currently in minor revisions. Design must be rigorous

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Research Focus: Pediatric

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Research focus: Pediatrics

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The pediatric specialty journal is very meticulous and serious, so no carelessness is allowed

(0) 讚！ | 芙蓉美玲

Magazine Name: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Field of expertise: Pediatrics Otorhinolaryngology
Magazine country: United States
Submission Date: 2009-11-12
Submission Method (submission system or mail, with submission link if there is a submission system): http://ees.elsevier.com/jep
It should be a minor revision at the moment. Just sent an email to appeal the reviewers' comments.
Because the final acceptance has not been received, it is unknown the final acceptance date, whether there are page fees, etc. The magazine review process is pretty quick (my first time submitting to an English magazine, felt faster than domestic ones), less than a month (submitted on November 12, 2009, sent for review on November 21, reviewed on December 13), 1 day decision in process, and on the morning of December 14, it became a preliminary accepted case report. (Just finished night shift, so excited

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Magazine Name: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Specialty: Otorhinolaryngology
Magazine Country: United States
Submission website: http://ees.elsevier.com/ijporl/
Revision Date: Received in revised form 17 January 2009
Revision Type (major, minor, reject): Between major and minor revisions
Acceptance Date: Accepted 19 January 2009
Page Fee: No page fee, color figure fee $2500 (5 figures)
Shared experience or lessons: 1. Answer the reviewer's questions honestly, objectively, and impartially. 2. Any inference conclusions in the discussion must have a close internal connection with the results. 3. Attitude must be serious. 4. Read all relevant SCI papers comprehensively. 5. Writing must be logically sound. 6. Language should be polished by a native speaker. 7. Ideally, the content should fill gaps in the literature

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁