Hello, have you received it now?

(0) 讚！ | 一点点798

Yes, indeed, last time I was delayed by something and it took almost 2 months to return. The original reviewer may have been busy, but this time I returned in a month, hoping for a good result

(0) 讚！ | 觅丝小仙女

Found a new reviewer and made major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 觅丝小仙女

The previous reviewers may not have gone through a second round of review. In my experience, the quicker you can make revisions, the better. I have been able to make revisions within two to three hours, taking advantage of the reviewer and editor's fresh memory. The quickest turnaround time for revisions in this journal was two months, but I returned my revisions within eight days. They don't care about your schedule, they just want to see if you have made the necessary changes

(0) 讚！ | 采春来了

Are there no new reviewers invited? It shouldn't take this long, you should proactively contact the editor. It will be troublesome if the previous reviewer doesn't respond and there are new reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 采春来了

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0 Emphasized research direction: Systematic review Experience sharing: I feel that this journal values innovation

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞思娜

It has been 4 and a half months since the second review, are your second reviews always this slow? It takes longer than the first review

(0) 讚！ | 觅丝小仙女

I am lucky to have two articles published in this magazine, both reviewed by two reviewers. This change in status should still be submitted for review and receive comments. I think it may be because the opinions of the two reviewers are quite different, so it is important to submit to a third reviewer. Good luck

(0) 讚！ | 采春来了

Can I ask how it happened that after the Required Reviews Completed, it turned back to under review? Has anyone else had the same experience?

(0) 讚！ | 天际湘云

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0 
Emphasized research direction: systematic review; Meta-analysis
Experience sharing: The first review took four months, the second review took one and a half months, and it took six months to be accepted. There were some unexpected issues in the first review, and it was not submitted for review after three months. In fact, the first review took one month. This was the first time I encountered this situation. Overall, the editorial handling was very positive, and the editors were responsible. Currently, the acceptance rate is only around eight percent. It is a very good journal! If there are suitable manuscripts, they will still be considered first

(0) 讚！ | 采春来了

Review speed: 6.0 
Emphasis research direction: systematic review; 
Experience sharing of Meta-analysis: Does anyone know how long it takes for the second review of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 采春来了

According to the requirements of the journal, but not all journals have the same requirements

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The selection of keywords should cover key industries of the manuscript as much as possible. For example, choose four keywords, the first two keywords can define the scientific research industry or the other half of scientific research, and the latter two keywords can choose research methods, research techniques, making it as easy as possible for readers to find the author's manuscript from each perspective

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to choose the first two keywords?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

Do I need to include a Graphicalabstract in my submission?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Sharing of experience: How long does it take from acceptance to proofreading? How much is the page fee?

(0) 讚！ | 留云安青

This magazine is still very difficult

(0) 讚！ | 四风运珹

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: More rigorous, it is recommended that the published article be between 2000-7000 words, with a preference for short articles of 2500-3500 words

(0) 讚！ | 摩柯运鹏

To 138****2976, more than 2000 words are required for this magazine, although the text quantity requirement is not very strict, it is definitely closer to 2000 words is better. It should be simple and concise, able to explain the problem. This magazine does not have page fees or review fees, but it does require color image fees, the specific amount is not remembered

(0) 讚！ | 气甲清昶

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 5.0 Experience Sharing: Recently, the editor-in-chief of the journal explained in an Editorial in Volume 57 of this year why seventy percent of papers are rejected before review. The journal has a low acceptance rate and focuses on updating evidence related to clinical or policy issues in nursing, emphasizing the need for a certain level of guidance

(0) 讚！ | 气甲清昶

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: This journal has a large number of submissions. The submission number exceeded 100 on January 22, with 278 articles published in 2015. Calculating based on submission number and article quantity, the acceptance rate is only a little over ten percent, which is quite challenging. The requirements for methods, perspectives, and other aspects are relatively high. Articles with innovative methods, rigorous thinking, and rich content can still give it a try

(0) 讚！ | 气甲清昶

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The quality requirements for the article itself are still very high, whether it is from the research methods, discussion and analysis of results, or limitations analysis, it is very professional and rigorous!

(0) 讚！ | 八卦翠冬