Basic manpower in the nonlinear field, there is still influence and reputation

(0) 讚！ | 狂飙_NDyn

It has been 4 months since it was submitted. Only one reviewer accepted the review and returned feedback. It has been left like this, and there is no use in urging. This efficiency is too slow

(0) 讚！ | HengZhao

Submitted on January 17th, still waiting to be published in the journal. It's taking too long

(0) 讚！ | 安慕希

Submitted on September 15th, revised format in between.
Under review as of September 28th.
Heard that the review process is very slow...leaving a comment here as a memento

(0) 讚！ | rockU

Submitted on September 15th, received by the editor on the 22nd. This is my first submission, and I feel there is a high chance of rejection

(0) 讚！ | rockU

Submitted on August 12, 2023

(0) 讚！ | briareos

Why is the speed so slow? One reviewer recommended acceptance, while the other said the language needs polishing. The editor provided minor revisions to improve the language. After making careful revisions, the manuscript was submitted. It has been almost four months. Two reminders were sent in the meantime, but the editor asked for patience. 

December 9th: Manuscript submitted.
April 28th: Minor revisions.
May 7th: Revised manuscript submitted.
May 10th: Under review.
May 21st: One feedback received.
Three reminders were sent in the meantime, the editor's attitude was good, but no action was taken.

September 14th: Another reminder sent.
September 15th: Accepted.

(5) 讚！ | 御风而行

The review process is quite long, but the result is good!

(1) 讚！ | Daniele

Submission: September 11, 2021;
Feedback: November 22, 2021 (major revision);
Resubmission: December 12, 2021;
Acceptance: January 11, 2022.
Celebrating my first SCI publication! The feedback from the two reviewers wasn't too difficult. Just the review process was a bit slow.

(1) 讚！ | 华北山大王

The manuscript always displays "submitted to journals" after it was submitted several days ago. Does anyone who knows what’s going on?

(6) 讚！ | 一念执着

The review speed was fast, and the comments given by the reviewers were very professional, and the overall feeling was good.

(9) 讚！ | 德鲁大叔

It took a long time for this journal to review manuscripts. There has been no news for many years since my paper was submitted.

(0) 讚！ | eeee

review quickly, only oneReviewer, give advice to the professional, can't say, edit directly according to

(2) 讚！ | wang

Review is very fast, only one reviewer, give advice to the professional, say no, edit directly according to

(0) 讚！ | wang

This journal is not very good, the review period is very long. If the article is new, the editor pays attention to it and the review is quite fast.The journal must require that each reviewer be positive and that one is not positive, because they will say that the reviewer may be the reader.

(12) 讚！ | 匿名

Average review speed. Quality of the journal is moderate.

(7) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名