Good luck coming one after another, with continuous good fortune, hitting the jackpot.

(0) 讚！ | 鲁洪水

Similar to the experience of the original poster, continue to receive good luck, successfully re-enter, and if you win, treat the original poster to a thank-you dinner~

(1) 讚！ | xiaolizi%

Accept the minor adjustments and fulfill your wishes after you're done

(0) 讚！ | YWSun

2024.02.08 submitted
2024.02.10 with editor
2024.02.16 under review
2024.05.27 Required Reviews Complete
2024.06.02 Reject

(0) 讚！ | WangY

Blessings to the original poster, may they win and fulfill their vow

(0) 讚！ | xiaolizi%

It really makes you feel that the submission experience is very poor

(0) 讚！ | Amorphous

The review speed is relatively fast, but the comments are really hard to put into words. Although there are many comments given, they are long-winded. The most annoying thing is that the three reviewers they found do not understand the research content of the manuscript, and they give random opinions. I don't know how they found the reviewers. I personally cautiously optimistic about the development trend of extreme manufacturing journals

(1) 讚！ | Amorphous

The overall submission process took 6 months. The detailed timeline is as follows:
2024/4/4 In Press, Journal Pre-proof online publication
2024/3/30 Accept
2024/3/28 Decision in Process
2024/2/29 Under Review
2024/2/26 Response Letter submitted--With Editor
2024/2/7 Major Revision (2 days before New Year, deadline on 2.27)
2024/2/5 Decision in Process (4 days before New Year)
2024/2/1 Required Reviews Completed (reviewers spent a month)
2023/12/29 Under Review (formally submitted for review)
2023/12/26 Revisions Being Processed for Author (Editor review R1)
2023/12/18 Major revision (not yet submitted for review, editor requested revisions)
2023/10/6-16 Invite to resubmit (2-month revision period), attempting to submit to other journals during this period

(1) 讚！ | LIJun98

Is it a total of three rounds of review to reject once, reject and resubmit once, and revise substantially?

(0) 讚！ | YWSun

Hello, how long have you been with the editor, and have you submitted the final version for review?

(0) 讚！ | 干就完事啦

1/3 submitted, 1/5 with editor, 1/6 with editor (date changed, status unchanged), still with editor as of 1/15. I thought this journal was supposed to be fast

(0) 讚！ | ouou

The higher the Impact Factor, the harder it is to submit. The first two articles were fine, but the third one was a struggle. After being rejected and invited to resubmit, it was finally accepted after major revisions

(0) 讚！ | SS0202

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and use "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:" as headings

(0) 讚！ | Manu fax

Hasn't it been posted by our senior brother already, so studying it doesn't count as being innovative?

(1) 讚！ | tonglingwang1234

Reviewed in two months and 20 days

(0) 讚！ | kokong

How fast can you move from with Editor to the next step?

(0) 讚！ | WustLee

I followed my senior brother's advice, why was my paper rejected?

(1) 讚！ | UPMC-身高1米88杨居儒

Journals that focus too much on theory are filled with a bunch of made-up formulas. I dedicated myself to conducting experiments and diligently learning the miraculous methods from my senior, only to be rejected instantly. It feels like an insult

(0) 讚！ | 杨居儒

Directly employed after the last repair on July 16, 2022.

(0) 讚！ | Friweld-G

Hello, may I trouble you to ask if this journal requires confirmation from other authors?

(0) 讚！ | 菜菜巍

I submitted my third paper in the field of engineering manufacturing.
Submitted for review in May 2022.
Received major revisions in June 2022, but the reviewer was not satisfied with the modifications.
The editor-in-chief requested significant revisions for another four months in July 2022.
Submitted again with overdue revisions in February 2023, and received major revisions after one month of review, followed by another half month of revisions.
Currently waiting for the results of the second review in May 2023.

(0) 讚！ | APGENG

1 month, 3 reviewers, a flurry of feedback; all I can say is that it is much easier to raise an objection than to propose a solution.

(0) 讚！ | Lalala_2022

March submission, the number has already reached nearly 180. The direction is traditional, but the editor has sent it for review. Hoping for good luck.

(9) 讚！ | Lalala_2022

October 11 submission
First major revision on December 15, with three review experts and the editor's opinion, totaling about 50 comments. Given 2 weeks;
Revised on February 1, waited another month;
Returned on February 7, still major revision, added a fourth reviewer;
Revised on February 20;
Accepted on February 27.

For those who are submitting for the first time, it is recommended to download a few in-press manuscripts to check the format (or download relevant PDFs from the official website of EM), including the format of figures and tables. Apart from the necessary innovation and methodology in the paper, the format requirements are also strict.

Good luck.

(0) 讚！ | chantonfi

After reading what the person downstairs said, I do think it is indeed quite challenging (due to the lack of articles this year). However, I still decided to give it a try with a hopeful attitude.

I submitted it for external review on October 19th, with the reference number close to 22-680.

Wishing myself and my brothers good luck.

(224) 讚！ | chantonfi