3/7 Submission
4/26 Review by two reviewers
5/14 Revision
6/10 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 草原小勇士

Is it still in the hands of the editor and not under review yet?

(0) 讚！ | YugiOh

Hello, what is the status of your article? My article's editor is also him, and the second round of revisions hasn't been updated for almost 3 months

(0) 讚！ | yanglanfu

It's been 25 days with the editor, should I expect a rejection? Should I follow up and ask about the status? I don't think it should take this long

(0) 讚！ | liuda

After submission, the corresponding author's email will receive a link for the Easychair review status, showing the number of reviewers invited, the number of reviewers who have accepted and completed the review, and the corresponding status update time. Throughout this process, the system status remains as "Under Review"

(0) 讚！ | YugiOh

Hey buddy, what will be the status if we can't find a reviewer for submission?

(0) 讚！ | liuda

It's been two weeks

(0) 讚！ | 敷衍

How long does the with editor stage usually last? It's been a week for me and nothing has changed yet

(0) 讚！ | 敷衍

Accepted after two weeks of review by RRC. The second submission to IJIE went much faster overall compared to the first submission, and the editors did not reject it due to the similarities in the topics (different research subjects and analytical perspectives). The only requirement was to decrease the overlap with the first submission

(0) 讚！ | YugiOh

Personal Second Submission Process: Submitted in December of the 23rd year, sent for external review the next day; three months passed without finding reviewers, after prompting with emails, two reviewers were found three days later (suspected editor change); half a month for review (9 + 7 comments, major revisions, three weeks for revisions); returned for revisions on April 3rd, submitted for review on the 6th, one reviewer completed the review on the same day, the other completed it a week later, currently in RRC, anxiously awaiting the results

(0) 讚！ | YugiOh

Please be patient, no later than one week

(0) 讚！ | ltl11

How long does it usually take for RRC to respond?

(0) 讚！ | 我爱北京

Usually there are two reviewers, if a reviewer declines, another one will be invited

(0) 讚！ | ltl11

These are opinions from several reviewers. It has been over three months for me, just received RRC, and found that two reviewers have completed their submissions

(0) 讚！ | 我爱北京

20231024 Submission
20231027 Editing
20231131 External review feedback, major revisions, 7 comments in total
20231224 Revised draft returned
20240131 Second review feedback, minor revisions
20240205 Minor revisions draft returned
20240210 Acceptance
Personally, after being rejected twice in IJIE, I took a two-year break and switched to the fourth area to hone my knowledge. This time, I was finally accepted after a half-year delay, and I can now focus on preparing my graduation thesis. Although IJIE has lost its top spot in recent years, in the eyes of us in the defense industry, it is still the GOAT!

(7) 讚！ | ltl11

The editor-in-chief's actions are really shocking, not professional at all

(0) 讚！ | 痞子、研究僧

The editor-in-chief is really rubbish

(0) 讚！ | 痞子、研究僧

Are there so few domestic readers for this journal? Other journals have hundreds of comments below

(0) 讚！ | 盼着sci能中吗

The final step in submitting articles is to choose a subscription, so you don't need to pay for layout fees

(0) 讚！ | LCC

Do we need to pay a layout fee for this?

(0) 讚！ | Mr.dynamicccc

Do I need to pay a layout fee for this? I checked with IF on WeChat, why do I still have to pay several thousand dollars for the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | Mr.dynamicccc

The reviewing process was very fast, with the review results being released within one month. I made three revisions before acceptance, so it took 4 and a half months from submission to acceptance

(2) 讚！ | LCC

It used to be a highly recognized journal in the field of impact protection, but it is not good now.

As for personal submission experience, it is very poor. In a recent submission, the editor-in-chief judged that it was a modified re-submission of my work from a year and a half ago based solely on a title with less than 50% similarity. If they had shown even a hint of reviewing attitude, they wouldn't have confused completely different works on low velocity and ballistic. A glimpse into the reality reveals that the editors are old and cannot keep up with the energy, they should be replaced, otherwise similar amateur operations will only increase

(6) 讚！ | Samir08

It took four months to find reviewers, and only one relatively professional reviewer was found. 
Later, it seems that the editor found another one just to fill the numbers, who only focused on format and language issues. 
After the major revisions were completed, the paper was accepted directly

(1) 讚！ | cccccccccccccccc

20220806 re-submit
20230121 major revision
20230227 revised
20230521 accepted
The complete proofreading process was not completed until 20230830

Final revision could not contact the Indian editor until 20230830. The complete proofreading process was not completed

(0) 讚！ | cccccccccccccccc