May 17, 2023, first submission;
Received major revisions around the end of September 2023,
Submitted revised manuscript on October 18, 2023,
Mar 27, 2024, Completed Accept, with numerous reminders in between, the process was extremely slow and not very challenging, requiring experimental validation and some degree of innovation

(0) 讚！ | ikon

Please send a reminder email. We have already sent two reminders before, and received a reply saying that the editor is on vacation

(0) 讚！ | fupy

It's almost been 8 months and I still haven't received any review comments. They are really slow

(0) 讚！ | 我超级喜欢zjy

Submitted on May 17, 2023, the manuscript will be revised and returned around October 2023, and accepted on March 27, 2024

(0) 讚！ | ikon

Average, although it is the first time to submit to this journal, the difficulty of submission does not seem to be high from the review comments, and the language requirements are not high

(0) 讚！ | Ainray

At the end of January, it was submitted;
In mid-May, first-round comments were given, with three reviewers, only two of whom provided comments;
Revised by the end of June;
In October, a reminder was sent, and a week later, minor revisions were suggested;
Accepted at the end of November or December.

It's easy, just slow.

(0) 讚！ | keerzhang

May I ask, it has always been under review, but the status date has been updated three times. How many reviewers are there, exactly?

(0) 讚！ | 100000sciisc

May I ask, it has been under review constantly, but the status date has been updated three times. How many reviewers are there in total?

(0) 讚！ | 100000sciisc

Excuse me, how long does it take for this journal with the editor? It has been one month already, and it is still in this state.

(0) 讚！ | 我爱吃鸡腿

Here's a small personal opinion for everyone. It needs to have some innovation, but it doesn't have to be too big. It should have experimentation and a sufficient amount of work. I submitted it in February, got rejected once and then resubmitted with minor revisions. Finally, it was accepted after 9 months. I initially submitted it in early February, received a rejection in mid-April and resubmitted it in mid-May. After minor revisions in mid-November, it was accepted within a week.

(1) 讚！ | 小学弟

The submission is about electromagnetic direction. This journal does not have a template, only a Word template for a book. You can roughly write it by referring to the previous format of papers in this journal. In the end, if it is accepted, it will be proofread in the system.

(1) 讚！ | humogu

The text translates to: "After being rejected by IEEE, I resubmitted my paper. The first review took four months, quite slow. I made major revisions in just one week, mainly because the innovation in the introduction was not well written. After submitting the revisions, I waited another month and finally got accepted. The difficulty was not very high, after all, the factor was quite low. As long as the article is complete with a little innovation, it can be accepted. However, the introduction still needs to be well written, highlighting the innovative points of the article and the differences from previous work."

(0) 讚！ | humogu

Original: 楼主，您好。最近我也准备投这个期刊，但是没有在官网上找到格式模板，只找到了Preparation of manuscripts，是不是按照要求修改格式就可以了？比如说全文两倍行距、每个图片成页、每个表格成页。
谢谢您的回复！

Translation: Hi, original poster. Recently, I am also preparing to submit to this journal, but I couldn't find a format template on the official website. I only found "Preparation of manuscripts." Do I just need to modify the format according to the requirements? For example, double-spacing the entire text, placing each image on a separate page, and placing each table on a separate page. 
Thank you for your response!

(0) 讚！ | XingNing

The master’s work was submitted to this journal, in the electromagnetic field-related direction. What a coincidence! Just in time for the epidemic. Just for your reference. 2020-07-03 Accepted/Forms

(3) 讚！ | 芒果飞机

Submitted in August last year, expert opinions received in March this year, revision resubmitted in April, now it’s the end of May, another month passed, and no comments have been received. Well, everyone must be prepared for a journal with such speed!

(3) 讚！ | 木头人123

The manuscript was submitted in May 19, there has been no news till February 2020, and we have retracted it by email. I urged the manuscript during this period, and they responded by email in a timely manner, but it was useless, there was still no news, and I was helpless.

(2) 讚！ | 斗鱼博士

Hello, ask when is your tracking number given to you, I selectd for two months, what news did not, did not send tracking number to me,I haven't been able to check my status so far, and I haven't sent back my email.

(3) 讚！ | liang

Payment can't succeed Why?Always prompt to try again later.

(1) 讚！ | 1

Excuse me: I have submitted the manuscript for 2 months, why not have a message.Is it waiting for the editorial department to return the tracking code before viewing it?I have been submiting in foreign journals for the first time. Can you share the experience?

(0) 讚！ | mmm

3 submission at the end of the month, and return to the review comments on May 14th, and raise 16-7 questions.On the 16th of the month, I returned to the reviewer again and raised 5 questions. After 2-3 days of revision, I returned and received a notice of acceptance one week later.It lasted for 4 months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

2 month review.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

The article is the numerical calculation of electromagnetic field and heat transfer. The first trial is two and a half months. After the minor repair, the second trial is one week. After the second month of recruitment, the typesetting is made, and the online waits for another three months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The article in this journal is good, but the impact factor is low, which is the journal of the Japan Security Association.Articles on electromagnetic non-destructive testing and electromagnetic calculations

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is good, the impact factor is too low

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The real review is a little more than a month, after the minor repair twoAfter receiving the week, the impact factor is too low, and there are more papers collected from the conference.The editor is very good, and every email can reply in time.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名