May I ask if this journal article cannot exceed 12 pages?

(0) 讚！ | LeeNa

Hello, I would like to ask where can I find the reviewer's comments after my submission has been rejected. Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | jiabin.

A very bizarre journal. In March of the 22nd year, my paper was accepted and I also paid the excessive page fees. The reviewer gave a very bizarre opinion that the written organization needs a lot of improvement. So I made 9 revisions, re-uploaded it, but 3 months later, the editor said it still didn't meet the "a lot" of modifications. I made more revisions and re-uploaded it again. 3 months later, the editor said it still didn't meet the "a lot" of modifications. I sent an email asking if they could point out specifically where the paper needed to be changed and why. Then the editor deleted my entire submission history from the website! No matter how many emails I sent, there was no reply. It's a waste of one year's time, and I won't even get the page fees back.

You accepted it without finishing the modifications, what the hell are you doing? Can you let the reviewer see if the modifications are qualified? The editor only cares about the quantity of modifications and demands that every word be rewritten. I don't even want this crappy journal from the fourth tier. The key point is that it's really frustrating. Can I assume that Arabs are really...?

(2) 讚！ | libin5765114

It took a year from submission to acceptance, which is quite a long time. It was published in the late stage of the fourth quarter, and I was notified of acceptance in April this year. Then in August, I was informed that it will be published in January next year. This is basically the rhythm. There is not much need for major revisions in the content of the review, so the difficulty is not high, as long as you have the time.

(0) 讚！ | caohongye

The manuscript was submitted at the end of August 2018 and was rejected at the beginning of October. It can be estimated that the editor did not sent it for review, and directly said that my format did not meet the requirements. This article was the first time in my life to be submitted to a SCI journal. I knew it was unlikely to be accepted, but I still wanted to submit it. I thought it can be a stepping stone to my PhD exam. I knew the article was poorly written, and it was rejected and I did not trouble myself for it. I later submitted it to IEEE Access and it was rejected either. It has been revised recently. I plan to submit to IAJIT for the second time. I hope everything goes well!

(6) 讚！ | 藤花与草莓0.0

In review for more than 6 months, 3 reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

contributed on October 29, 2012, and received a notice of acceptance on December 23, 2012. The review time was nearly two months.However, the publication will wait until July 2014... The publishing time is a bit long.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名