Status of "awaiting DE assignment" is usually the final status before receiving the feedback for revisions. When this status appears, it means that the feedback will be returned within a couple of days

(0) 讚！ | 红汤串串

Have you experienced the stage of "Awaiting DE Assignment" after the end of one rework review?

(0) 讚！ | CXYpursuit

10.23 submission
12.23 major revision
01.24 accepted the next day after minor revision

(0) 讚！ | Martin1

23.8.31 submission
23.10.31 major revision
23.11.28 resubmission
23.12.18 minor revision
23.12.20 resubmission
24.1.11 minor revision
24.1.12 resubmission
24.1.16 accept, took 4 and a half months

(0) 讚！ | 红汤串串

Can you tell me what is your current status? I also switch between these two states, what is the reason? Is it because the reviewers rejected the manuscript and the editors are inviting other reviewers again?

(0) 讚！ | 哈熊熊

Slow and cumbersome, Yu Chuck asked us to cite the articles in this journal more often when revising, but eventually rejected them. Currently, mainly some watery articles are being submitted, no wonder why the journal has been in the four areas for such a long time. The editor knows that when you transfer submissions, you will definitely not delete the cited articles, thus increasing your own citations. Our research group has blacklisted this journal and will only submit to journals in the same field next door in the future

(1) 讚！ | SCI大神

The first submission of the initial draft was rejected due to formatting issues, and it has been resubmitted

(0) 讚！ | chenqinchuan

Is the paper accepted now? I am currently stuck at awaiting reviewer selection

(0) 讚！ | chenqinchuan

The initial review is slow, and it still can't enter the review stage after two months.

(0) 讚！ | HemeH

May 12th, the status once again returns to awaiting reviewer selection.

(0) 讚！ | HemeH

Always editing in hand.

(0) 讚！ | HemeH

The changing status between "awaiting reviewer selection" and "awaiting reviewer assignment".

(0) 讚！ | HemeH

The editor had been idle for 21 days before finally starting to await reviewer assignment.

(1) 讚！ | HemeH

May I ask if this information you provided is true and exists?

(0) 讚！ | HemeH

Didn't listen to the editor's words, Xiaoxiu was instantly rejected, angering the editor. Such a waste. It was modified three times, delaying it for 11 months.

(0) 讚！ | mqlong

Still always taking rejection as a dangerous person.

(0) 讚！ | mqlong

The appropriate reviewers for the articles I possibly submitted were not found, so the process was relatively slow. The editor-in-chief did make some changes to the sentences in the end, as they prefer using British English. The editor-in-chief seems to have a strong personality and always says, "If you don't follow my requirements, I will reject your submission next time." I wonder if anyone else has had a similar experience.

(1) 讚！ | mqlong

The review process is fast, and generally, review suggestions can be provided within a week. Major revisions are usually given a two-month revision period, while minor revisions are given one month. Grammar and formatting errors in the later stages of the paper will be returned for minor revisions. Language requirements are relatively strict, and the associate editor and editor-in-chief may make minor modifications to the language of the article.
Submitted on April 24th
Accepted on September 18th

(21) 讚！ | wlsh

This journal can be regarded as a combination of built environment and building thermal comfort in the field. The manuscript was submitted in April, and the results of the first review were received at the end of July. It was revised and resubmitted in early August, and the results of the second review were received in mid-September. At the beginning of November, it was accepted after the deputy editor-in-chief revised it, and the editor-in-chief finally revised it (Thanks a lot for your detailed revision, editor-in-chief)! Accepted!

(1) 讚！ | dandy

19-24-Feb-2019_Submit; 11-Apr-2019_Major revision; 11-May-2019: A revision has been submitted. (IBE-19-0060.R1) 09-Jun-2019: Minor revision. Please provide institutional email address, not personal email address... 19-Jun-2019: A revision has been submitted. (IBE-19-0060.R2) 28-Jun-2019: Reject. At the moment, it seems the paper is written by a student who is not really an expert on indoor air quality... ADM: Yu, Chuck

(4) 讚！ | yuliu929

The review speed was not very good. The first review results were given in 4 months, and the minor revision results were given after 2 months. Two weeks later, even when one reviewer suggested directly publication and another one suggested adding “Numerical Study on” to the title, it was rejected. Rejected! Rejected! What's the situation? It’s too speechless! Unless necessary, it is recommended to submit carefully.

(5) 讚！ | zsg5560

The first-instance of journals is faster, about 20 days.The three reviewers gave more professional opinions.The editor-in-chief is responsible and has made some pertinent amendments.The editor was also very careful and gave many details of the article.It takes about a month and a half to get from receiving to receiving, and it is very efficient.In short, the journal deserves more attention and contributions.

(10) 讚！ | 加油

The review speed of the journal is relatively fast. The first-instance reply can be received within 21 days from the submission. There are 3 reviewers, and the submitted review comments are more informative.Will give a pertinent opinion, editing efficiency is relatively high, more responsible.It took about 1.5 months from the submission of the article to the reception. Overall, the journal was highly efficient and the review was seriously responsible.The article has innovation can be received, it is recommended that you write according to the reference style required by the journal, and the language is concise.

(18) 讚！ | 000

I feel that the reviewers have higher requirements for English language writing, and the opinions are still very pertinent. British journals are all this style. I don't want the style of American journals to be rough.As long as the article has innovations, it can be acceptd.Although it was finally drafted, it was also accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 888

feel that reviewers have higher requirements for English language writing, opinions are still very pertinent, the United KingdomJournals are all this style, and I don't want the style of American journals to be rough.As long as the article has innovations, it can be acceptd.Although it was finally drafted, it was also accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 888