Submitted in January 2023, went through 2 major revisions and 1 minor revision (with a different reviewer each time), took 10 months to be accepted. One month after acceptance, it has not been published online yet, even though the publication fee has been paid and the final proof has been approved. Does anyone know why it's not online yet?

(0) 讚！ | 不断努力的小白

Not recommended to invest anymore

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

May I ask if you have received your manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 1景

Excuse me, is your manuscript received this year?

(0) 讚！ | 1景

If you want to submit to a top journal, just go ahead, no one is stopping you.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

This journal has now become a low-quality publication. It has changed publishers and lost its credibility. No one dares to submit their work anymore. It is on the verge of being kicked out and has become very trashy.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

Brother, did you invest for 23 years? Did you receive the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 1景

The draft was submitted at the end of January, underwent major revisions in mid-March, and minor revisions in mid-May. Since late May, it has been in a pending approval state. When asked, the editor said it was undergoing technical checks. Later, I checked the official website and found that this magazine has not published any articles since December 2022. It is estimated that it has been affected by the scandal of retraction and review after being transferred to hinwida. It is unknown when it will be resolved.

(0) 讚！ | 1景

Yes, this publishing company is becoming less and less recognized.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

This journal was a top journal in 2018, but later it changed its publisher and became an open-access journal. It has gradually declined since then and is no longer as good as it used to be. If your article is of high quality, I suggest submitting it elsewhere because this journal is not what it used to be. It is expected to be ranked in the bottom 3 tiers in the future, and future generations will mourn and not learn from it, thus causing future generations to mourn for them again.

(2) 讚！ | SCI大神

Now, I feel that the indoor air is quite bad, especially after it has been ventilated.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

You have the final say, whether it's good or not. You're nothing.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

That should be negotiated well, and it is also open-source.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

The transitional period should also involve negotiating and handling the previous documents properly. We cannot keep tossing the ball back and forth.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

You can only say that there have been some unpleasant experiences recently due to the period of change. However, this journal itself is very good, and at least it has not declined yet. This is the top journal for indoor air.

(0) 讚！ | yoyoiy

I hope you can experience such a thing, where you toss your paper back and forth like playing soccer. That way, you may better appreciate the quality of that journal.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

You don't have to go crazy and slander this journal just because you have a little problem. Whether this journal is good or not is not up to you to decide, at least for now it is widely recognized.

(0) 讚！ | yoyoiy

It is a very trashy journal, especially now that it has switched to Xindawei Publishing. The revised manuscripts that were modified at Wiley have become new manuscripts at Xindawei. It's really disgusting, the edits and suggestions made were simply disregarded. Everyone, please don't submit to it.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈哈1992

22/06/09 submitted
22/06/10 under review
22/07/14 revision 1
22/08/10 revision 1 submitted
22/08/12 under review
22/09/07 revision 2
22/09/09 revision 2 submitted
22/09/10 under review
22/09/12 accepted

Both reviews were returned in about a month, and the final acceptance came just two days after minor revisions! The editor's efficiency is very high.

(0) 讚！ | QingZh

Overall, the submission process is quite lengthy. It took over two months to receive feedback from the reviewers, but the feedback was very constructive. It took about a month to make significant revisions, carefully following the reviewers' suggestions. After that, we waited another month and were informed that minor language polishing was needed. Finally, within a week after making the necessary revisions, the submission was accepted!

Submission date: June 17, 2021.
Reviewer's feedback received on August 23, major revisions made.
Revised version submitted on September 22.
Minor revisions made on October 13.
Revised version submitted again on October 19.
Accepted on October 27.

(0) 讚！ | 你我的共同

The editor is very responsible and understanding. Good, pertinent reviews but the overall process was a bit long.

(0) 讚！ | delia

Impact Factor: 2.55

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Received a reviewer's suggestion for revision after one month of submission.It may be a bit of a cross-disciplinary reason, the opinions of four reviewers.Three of them were praised and one was doubtful.A total of more than 20 comments.The reviewer is very responsible, including the imperfect structure of the article, and the need for revision is proposed.After the change was returned, the editor modified the language and accepted it.After two months, I feel that this journal is constantly improving efficiency. Although it was successfully received, in retrospect, the process is still not easy.I hope to help the insects friends

(5) 讚！ | 匿名