This magazine clearly discriminates against Chinese people. I tried to submit 2 short essays, although they were not very high-end articles, they were not too bad either. They were all rejected without any reason. I submitted one to another magazine and it has been accepted, although it is in the second tier. The other one is also under revision. The advantage is that they reject quickly. Ha ha.

(0) 讚！ | bosy

fanqiangcaixing

(0) 讚！ | Nick Aly

How can we solve this? I'm also puzzled

(2) 讚！ | 是你的俊宇呀

Can I ask who the witness is when registering? How should we handle this?

(0) 讚！ | 是你的俊宇呀

How do we solve this problem?

(0) 讚！ | 长安广运

So the question remains, what should we do next?

(0) 讚！ | 运莱来了

I would like to have this paragraph translated into English and Japanese.
Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | Hardy Wheeler

How did you solve it at that time?

(0) 讚！ | 努力啊大雅珍

Whenever I try to register, it keeps prompting "Prove you are human*. Do you have this situation as well? How did you solve it? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 花拳阳霁

A meta, rejected in 10 days with no comments (maybe the only advantage is that it was fast, so I can submit it to another journal quickly ?

(0) 讚！ | 娜娜酱吖

Highlight the innovation of your own research, showing distinctive characteristics different from others. The magnitude of the difference is another issue; the important thing is to have a distinction. As long as there is a distinction, it is considered innovation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Given the diversity and complexity of biology, it is perfectly acceptable for different results to emerge and be published, as scientific research itself allows and encourages questioning, supplementing, and improving upon previous knowledge, even overturning it. When writing a paper, it is important to focus on two main strategies: accurately presenting materials and methods as well as results, especially where they differ from others, and emphasizing these differences in detail; in the discussion section, do not avoid contradictions, compare similarities and differences with previous research, and attempt to provide reasonable and effective explanations

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to handle it when my discussion conflicts with a previously published article?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

How to highlight the innovation of an article during discussion?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Did you submit this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 无冬轩秀

Can you please be more specific?

(0) 讚！ | Oliver Jerry

I still suggest my friends in China not to subscribe to this magazine. I looked through all the articles online from the 2018 issues, and none of them were from mainland China. There were quite a few articles from Taiwan, so it is clear that the editorial department has a bias against content from mainland China

(0) 讚！ | 稻妻若兰

Subscribing to this magazine is just a waste of time. They won't give feedback even after half a month. It's better to submit to another magazine instead. This is just a personal suggestion, for reference only

(0) 讚！ | 北海宇航

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Although the score is not high, it is also not easy to be accepted. The submission was rejected in 10 days without any review comments

(0) 讚！ | 南川若星

In any case, the situation with this bear won't change, so as long as it doesn't fall, we should consider ourselves lucky

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

@FullFootballClub On the top of this page, there is the magazine homepage and the submission link. Just click to enter

(0) 讚！ | 神古苑博

Where can I find the submission link for this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃寻梅

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: The review was relatively fast! I received a response within two weeks! (Rejection straight away) Blunt and rude! The reasons were very simple! A couple of sentences that were dismissive, without any constructive feedback! If you are in a hurry, maybe you can try your luck online!

(0) 讚！ | 暗月寺吉月

I once submitted an article, but received a rejection letter from the editor with no feedback. However, the feedback came back in just 3 weeks

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁