I submitted an article before, and the editor kept it for three months in the same state as yours. Later, the chief editor directly rejected it without sending it for external review. If there is not a strong theoretical basis, I do not recommend submitting it. I am very frustrated.

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈酱

Comrade, what is the current situation?

(0) 讚！ | Wsysu

How easy is it?

(1) 讚！ | Wang Jiasen

Algorithm paper, submitted in December last year, accepted in July this year, and will be published online in September.

(0) 讚！ | Chuyang Changliu

AIAA J is indeed top-notch in the industry, but I disagree with your statement that it is only second to Progress. I feel that JGCD has much higher requirements in terms of articles than AIAA J.

(0) 讚！ | 面面

It has been four months since I submitted it at the end of August and it is still in the status of being assigned to an editor. What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | 母胎solo

The neighborhood also lowered the temperature by 3 degrees, feeling so uncomfortable

(3) 讚！ | yydsa

What are the submission and publication fees for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | kkaia

Yes, this needs to be reminded to all authors.

(0) 讚！ | 永不疲劳的氢X酸

May I ask if the Author Confirmation Form will be sent to each author's email and require them to sign it before submission?

(0) 讚！ | AHH

After the major revision submission, it has been showing "Assigned to Associate Editor" for a month. May I ask what is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | Dr.Yueting

Estimated that I won't encounter such a lucky submission experience in this lifetime.

(0) 讚！ | 永不疲劳的氢X酸

The impact factor of CJA is indeed high, but in terms of recognition within the aerospace industry, AIAA J is considered to be better. If one is not a scholar strongly related to this field, CJA's impact factor is indeed superior, and it is recommended to submit to CJA, as the review process is also faster.

I had the opportunity to submit to CJA once before, and both reviewers (with 6+1 opinions) were relatively satisfied, but for some reason, it was rejected after revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 叶土豆

How is it compared to CJA, CJA if high likes?

(0) 讚！ | yintuyuan

submitted 2021-may-08 - Submitted on May 8, 2021.
major revision 2021-jul-11 - Major revision on July 11, 2021.
r1 submitted 2021-sep-05 - Revision 1 submitted on September 5, 2021.
accept 2021-dec-13 - Accepted on December 13, 2021.
Last year, I published an article which I personally believe is one of the top journals in the field of aerospace, second only to "Progress in Aerospace Science". However, the impact factor is not strong enough. This year, it fell to Q2 and was surpassed by AST and CJA. It was even surpassed by MDPI's "Aerospace". However, internationally, AIAA Journal is still more recognized. Recently, I submitted another article and hope it gets accepted.

(8) 讚！ | Hsuan

Submitted 2021-Mar-18
First Decision 2021-Sep-01
R1 Submitted 2021-Oct-12
Accept 2021-Oct-20

It is a well-known top journal in the industry. I have submitted two articles, one was rejected and one was accepted. The reviewers' comments were very insightful and greatly improved the articles.

(25) 讚！ | 叶土豆

2022.03.16 Submitted to Journal
2022.03.17 Awaiting Associate Editor Assignment
2022.03.19 Assigned to Associate Editor
2022.04.12 Under Review
2022.04.21 Decline
Two reviewers, one major revision and one rejection.

(0) 讚！ | 可期

2021-8-18 Submission
2021-8-24 The editor withdrew the submission and asked me to make three key revisions. They said that I could resubmit after making the changes.
2021-9-3 Resubmission
2021-11-22 Editorial comments returned, major revisions required. There were a total of four reviewers who asked numerous questions. Two reviewers recommended acceptance, one reviewer strongly rejected, and one reviewer stated that there were several issues preventing them from recommending acceptance.
2022-1-17 Submission of response to editorial comments. The response consisted of 50 pages of comments.
2022-3-8 Acceptance
Overall, the journal is very good. I'm not sure why it is classified as a third or fourth-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The reviewers asked very professional questions, and although the process of responding was painful, it allowed my work to progress further.

(11) 讚！ | SHENGJUAN11

The aerospace field is still considered a top-tier journal, although it is in the field of engineering aerospace. However, what I am doing is more like mathematical and theoretical research, very fundamental. I have submitted once in 2018 and once in 2021, and both were accepted. Typically, there are three reviewers, with one usually being a reviewer from AIAA or other journals, and the other two may be chosen by the associate editor. The reviewers are very professional and review the papers very carefully. However, the review process is relatively long, both times taking about six months.

(25) 讚！ | 挽歌亦清歌

A very good journal in the aerospace field, with professional editors and reviewers. Although it is classified as a Tier 3 journal, it is highly recognized within the industry and is definitely worth submitting to. 

2020.08.09 Submitted to Journal
2020.08.11 Author Confirmation Form Completion submitted
2020.10.08 Major Revision
2021.01.14 A revision has been submitted
2021.03.13 Minor Revision
2021.03.23 A revision has been submitted
2021.03.27 Accept
2021.05.06 Online

(13) 讚！ | 可期

Any news? I have been submitting for two months and there is no news at all.

(0) 讚！ | 爱论文

I indeed did something that had not much innovation. Both reviewers required major revisions. One of them suggested to submit it as a technical note after revision. The editor rejected the manuscript, and the requirements for theory and innovation are very high.

(0) 讚！ | ditata

I submitted the full text at the end of February 19, selected editor and experts, and then submitted all authors’ signature emails. We completed it very quickly, but the journal was dilatory, and the "Author Confirmation Form Completion submitted" was displayed until 07-Mar-2019. I urged the review. At first, I was very nervous, and I was afraid what I could do if it was directly rejected. However, I felt that the editorial office was still relatively polite and very nice. I was about to see how it was going in September. When it was not yet September, the review comments came back indeed. They let me change four short paragraphs, add an uncertainty analysis, and return within 30 days. Strive to finish this week! After "assigned to deputy editor" lasted for nearly 20 days, it was finally accepted! After anxious waiting, I continued to submit the copyright statement "Copyright Completion submitted". From February 28 to September 18, it took 10 days short of 7 months. I was tortured to death! It entered the "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" stage three days later! The proof was sent back on September 25! On October 22, I received an e-mail notification that they had prepared for publication online, and it could not be revised later, unless the publication of an erratum was sent!

(4) 讚！ | narcker

A very good journal. It has been reviewed for a year and the editors and reviewers were very responsible. But for the assessment criteria, I would rather submit to this than other Q1 journals.

(9) 讚！ | 文章还是要的

Relatively easy in

(0) 讚！ | 硕士