It should be within a month, but I forgot the exact time

(0) 讚！ | akabaozi

Okay, thank you so much. May I ask how long it took from the second review submission to the final result?

(0) 讚！ | 3yellowchick

If you are not in a hurry, you can wait. It is common to encounter one or two re-submissions now

(0) 讚！ | akabaozi

Is everything going well with the follow-up? I have now received emails for both the first revision and the second revision. I am worried that it will take a long time. I am torn about whether to withdraw the submission

(0) 讚！ | 3yellowchick

This kind of email has appeared twice, the article was resubmitted both times and new reviewers were invited to re-evaluate

(0) 讚！ | akabaozi

Hello, what's up with you? I received this email just like you after the second round of revisions and it has been nine days since then, I'm still in AE

(0) 讚！ | 3yellowchick

The submission on 2024/04/07 is still unassigned. I thought the open source would be faster, but it's slower than expected. If you are in a hurry, please do not submit

(0) 讚！ | mrzhao

It's been 5 months, and still REVIEWERS INVITED

(0) 讚！ | hervey

Has it been accepted after re-submission?

(0) 讚！ | akabaozi

I have also encountered this situation, most likely to be re-examined

(0) 讚！ | baizongyao

How long did it take for you to receive the first review?

(0) 讚！ | W_55

Submitted on November 12th, still pending

(0) 讚！ | hervey

Nine days after the second review, I received an email: It is taking us longer than expected to send you an editorial decision for your manuscript. As standard practice, we perform rigorous peer review integrity checks as part of the editorial process. These checks can sometimes incur delays. We wanted to inform you that we are still working to send you an editorial decision as soon as possible. Does anyone know what this means? The current status is still pending approval

(0) 讚！ | akabaozi

It has been two months since we invited and submitted

(0) 讚！ | W_55

Received email on 7.29: Now that all the checks of your files have been completed, we are pleased to inform you that your manuscript is moving into production to ready it for publication online.

Currently, the system shows "published," but the payment has not been notified yet.

(0) 讚！ | shanmama

This publication is very professional, and the review comments are pertinent.

(0) 讚！ | 陈颖频

Record the schedule of submission and provide reference for other classmates and teachers:
4.30: Submitted
5.8: All issues resolved
5.11: Deputy editor assigned
Continuously looking for academic editors AE invited and submitted, bouncing back and forth twice
5.29: Found one
5.30: Under review
6.6: Update: Entered pending approval on 6.5
6.18: Major revision
6.28: Submitted after revision, randomly entered under review
7.11: Pending approval
7.26: Accepted for publication

The recent trend of H Publishing: The time spent in the editorial department is long, but the speed of entering external review is accelerated. This paper is no exception. It took a month to enter external review. The total time for two rounds of review does not exceed 20 days, and with my revision time, the entire review process for this paper does not exceed 30 days, leaving several dozen days waiting for news from the editorial department.

(0) 讚！ | shanmama

May I ask what statuses are available? Mine has always been "submitted" and it does not show "under review."

(0) 讚！ | Cecilia05

The editor is very responsible, and the four reviewers are also very professional. Experts' opinions on the research content are very pertinent and hit the key points of the paper, which is very helpful for improving the quality of the paper. The editor also provided the opportunity for major revisions. After revising based on the expert's opinions, it was accepted. The journal requires British English and has high language requirements. It is best to proofread it.

(0) 讚！ | The_Bluebird

The journal is quite fast after being open source:
1-21 Submission
2-12 Major revision
3-23 Minor revision
3-30 Acceptance
The research topic is quite niche, with only two reviewers. Due to the lack of previous comparisons, the reviewers were not satisfied with the comparison section. After making the modifications, the reviewers still had some suggestions, but the editor decided to accept the paper, which made me very happy. The journal requires British English and prefers proofreading.

(0) 讚！ | zzz12345

A very professional journal, although it has a low impact factor, it is classified as a third quartile in the JCR. The editor is very responsible, extremely rigorous, and efficient.
Speed: There were two major revisions and two minor revisions. The first external review took 2 and a half months, but subsequent external reviews did not exceed one month.
Review: There are a total of 5 reviewers, among which two are reliable, providing professional and relevant comments. The other three are not very reliable, as their comments only suggest adding references.
Recommendation: It is recommended to have a native speaker proofread the English before submitting the manuscript.

(2) 讚！ | thetitleis

2020.10.28 Submission
2020.12.3 Received notice of major revision
2020.12.26 Submitted revised manuscript
2021.2.19 Received acceptance notice

(0) 讚！ | ikon

Paper is under review since six months. Very long review time.

(0) 讚！ | anonymous

An image processing related article. There were three reviewers. 2019.08.12 Submission; 2019.10.09 First review notice requiring major revision was received; 2019.11.04 Major revision for the first review was returned; 2019.11.26 The second review notice requiring major revision was received; 2019.12.23 Major revision for the second review was returned; 2020.02.18 Received the acceptance notice. Basically, it takes about one month per round for external review, and the review comments will be returned to the editorial office, and then they will issue a notice after 10 working days. From submission to acceptance, it took half a year.

(1) 讚！ | JessieW

This journal is a bit confusing. It feels that the management is particularly irregular, and the review of manuscripts is still super slow. I suggest you to submit your manuscripts carefully. Just talk about my personal experience. The first review lasted 6 months; 7 reviewers (yes, yes, it was 7 reviewers! I was totally confused when the comments came back...); the editor required a major revision. It was revised for a month, with more than 50 comments responded, and each comment was answered very seriously. The results of the second review were good. The reviewers basically had no further comments. The editor gave the comments for acceptance, but I needed to revise according the two reviewers' comments. Only two comments for revision, one asked us to explain the algorithm in the conclusion section, and the other required us to add references. I thought it was okay. After the second revision was submitted, I waited for three months, and then the editor rejected it! The reason was that the writing was unprofessional, and some technical terms was used incorrectly... I really don’t understand, the technical terms are commonly used in the field, why the writing is unprofessional? The 7 professional reviewers did not say that it is unprofessional, but the editor directly rejected the manuscript for this reason. Afterwards, I appealed and sent three emails. I sent it to the journal's editorial office and the editor-in-chief. They all ignored it... Even if they didn't accept the appeal, at least they should reply my email. It’s so deceiving~ I advise everyone to be cautious.

(4) 讚！ | Wind