期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY LetPub Score 8.3
56 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.4 Influence 8.0 Speed 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | IEEE T VEH TECHNOL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0018-9545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1939-9359 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 11.50%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tvt-ieee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 1537每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 3.62% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0018-9545%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 7.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: mazino 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-30 11:01:44 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: cbeat 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-28 00:58:47 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 奋斗的小万 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-27 10:18:38 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 奋斗的小万 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-27 10:17:47 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: chestnutmomo 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-27 09:42:57 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 树哲 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 18:24:53 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: chaoszzss 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 15:59:52 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: wxy 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 02:46:01 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 栗子怪兽 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-25 10:43:28 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: QKQ1028 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-22 11:04:12 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: QKQ1028 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-20 15:44:19 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 神之一掷 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-19 22:10:28 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: Cakkk 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-19 21:26:13 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: cccc1 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-13 17:13:35 評論於 I have been back from the major repair for more than two months now and I am still with AE, not moving at all. ![]() ![]() |
作者: fdewfwsfw 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-10 20:25:23 評論於 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 喜杨杨呀 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-08 09:33:50 評論於 2024.12.17 submitted 2025.3.8 with AE ![]() ![]() |
作者: QKQ1028 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-28 17:04:19 評論於 After about a week of being under review (in the hands of the editor), it will then move to With AE (in review). ![]() ![]() |
作者: wowowowo 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 10.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-27 19:37:38 評論於 Dude, what is the status of your return from the major overhaul? I have been "Under review" for a month and a half since I returned. ![]() ![]() |
作者: QKQ1028 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 16:37:23 評論於 No additional comments, the third reviewer before said that I did not respond seriously to the first reviewer's questions, I am speechless. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ChienY 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 13:14:55 評論於 The editors I have encountered are very good, they are efficient and respond promptly to reminders. The problem lies with the reviewers, who clearly requested a 6-week revision deadline but have been continuously delaying the review process. It seems that many transportation-related manuscripts are being treated irresponsibly by reviewers. If they are not willing to take on the task, they should just decline it instead of dragging it out. It is truly frustrating. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 基尼泰美 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 10:33:54 評論於 The submitted long article took too long, a full two years to be exact. 22-Feb-2023: Submitted 22-Jan-2024: Reconsider, Major Revisions 15-Mar-2024: a revision has been submitted 09-Jun-2024: Reconsider, Major Revisions (with reviewers) 19-Jun-2024: a revision has been submitted 10-Feb-2025: Accepted with Minor Revisions as a Paper 12-Feb-2025: a revision has been submitted 26-Feb-2025: Accepted as a Paper It was really tough, with no news for months, emails never getting replies. Thankfully, the outcome was good. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 图提图 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-25 15:31:41 評論於 First submission on September 10, 2024. Rejected on September 19, 2024 due to the manuscript being too long. Second submission with revisions on October 9, 2024. Currently under review. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 泰勒 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-24 22:07:33 評論於 This is ridiculous! One comment led to a major revision, did they add new reviewers? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 00 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-24 19:04:10 評論於 The hiring process that was completed yesterday, including two rounds of overall revisions, took 28.5 months. ![]() ![]() |
作者: QKQ1028 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-24 09:20:06 評論於 I'm back, and I have received a major revision. One comment was very unreasonable. The first two reviewers had no comments, but the third reviewer felt that my response to the first reviewer's comment was not serious. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us