Hello, may I ask about the review period?

(0) 讚！ | kkkkkkssss

The difficulty level is very high. It took three reviews to be accepted, and the two reviewers looked very carefully, providing very insightful feedback. Each revision felt like a complete transformation.

Thank you very much to the reviewers for their professionalism and rigor! This is my first TIT article, and it is worth commemorating

(1) 讚！ | mathyyy

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title it with "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | xingzheng

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(1) 讚！ | xingzheng

I don't understand anything else, but two things are certain: tsp is better than tip; OR has a much greater impact in operations research and management than tit does in computer theory

(0) 讚！ | 预策

You are only qualified to criticize PAMI if you have simultaneously won TIT and TPAMI; otherwise, you are just praising yourself for whatever you have achieved.

(44) 讚！ | 阳顶天

The majority of TPAMI papers are engineering applications in the field of computer vision. There are a lot of people working on it and submitting papers, which has raised its impact factor. In terms of academic level, it is at a similar level as TIP, but not as good as TSP. Computer vision is essentially a field where people just flood it with papers, and TPAMI is a representative of that. It does not have outstanding academic contributions.

(0) 讚！ | lepingouin83

【02520】It seems to be a misunderstanding. The original comment should be understood as follows: "Journals like tit and or are both highly theoretical journals, so they have low citation rates and therefore low impact factors." It should not be interpreted as tit and or being equally difficult journals (the original comment did not express a stance on whether these two journals have the same level of difficulty). Haha~

(0) 讚！ | 科研界小菜狗

The text translates to: "The person above said that TIT is equivalent to Operations Research (OR) in the field of Operations Management, which clearly shows a complete lack of understanding of the importance of OR in Operations Management. Each year, the number of OR publications in mainland China does not exceed single digits. If you publish one OR paper, you are basically considered an outstanding young researcher or even a distinguished professor. However, can you obtain a project with just one TIT paper? Comparing TIT to OR is simply a joke!!"

(0) 讚！ | 02520

There is no need to criticize applications using theories. Theories without applications are also useless. National development cannot be separated from engineering applications.

(0) 讚！ | AIPHM

Tit is very good, but you don't have to put TPAMI down to the level of TSP. TSP and TIP are at a similar level, much lower than TPAMI. As for TII, TIE, and TIM, which are just spam, there's no need to mention them.

The ranking of trans is as follows:
TPAMI, TIT >= TRO >= TAC, TMI, TIP, TSP > TWC, TMM, TCVST, TBME > TII, TIE, TIM

(0) 讚！ | doitlikenever

This is actually the consequence of only looking at impact factor. It focuses solely on applications and disregards theory. Because high impact factor journals are usually application-oriented, but applications quickly get drowned in the tide of the times. It is normal for traditional basic journals to lower their impact factor rankings in the future, maybe even reaching the fourth quartile someday. However, their importance is unquestionable and their influence is far-reaching. The Chinese Academy of Sciences should learn from the ranking methods in the West and consider incorporating some comprehensive indicators into consideration.

(0) 讚！ | 喵喵10086

Oh my god, if TIT is in the third zone, which other journal under IEEE dares to claim to be awesome.

In terms of engineering theory alone, TIT is definitely the top, followed by TSP, TAC, and TPAMI (I personally feel that TPAMI is popular because the field is hot, so there are many submissions and thus high acceptance difficulty), followed by TII, TIE, and TIM.

TIT feels like the giant top journal of OR (Operations Research), with a low zone but absolutely prestigious status.

The reason for the low impact factor is probably simple, TIT and OR papers are too difficult, most people can't understand them, let alone cite them.

Of course, some people say TIT is a "water journal" and that's not a problem. I have also seen many experts like this: they are not just pretending, they can actually contribute to TIT easily. After all, for someone with a math background, what is difficult about engineering journals?

(34) 讚！ | 科研界小菜狗

Awesome, Tit is only in the third district.

(26) 讚！ | ohuo

Coding theory is the best magazine.
Acceptable mathematical problems.
If not, I will go to submit to the Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A...
Novice trembles with fear...

(14) 讚！ | 喵喵10086

I do research on theoretical machine learning. It is the most difficult to be accepted by Journal of Machine Learning Research (JLMR) and TIT, and it is much easier (to be accepted) if you submit to IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) and IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE), which were partial to application.

(10) 讚！ | Machine Learning

It is an ace journal in information theory, which has published many classic achievements and articles on the basis of computational theory. There are many features of this journal which cannot be figured out, but it is not a journal to publish meaningless articles easily.

(10) 讚！ | zarathustr

This is a very good journal, almost one of the best in the field of communication and signal processing. It has the highly strong theory and it’s recognized as one of the most difficult journals with the highest value in the field. We can't just evaluate it by the impact factor, and I must to fight for it.

(129) 讚！ | Andrea Goldsmith

The Chinese Academy of Sciences should not engage in any more partitions.A journal does not look good at the impact factor. The partition can only be a reference. The most important thing is the word-of-mouth and recognition of the journal in the peer. This cannot be quantified.Dividing the journals into three or six chapters by partition is actually a simple and rude way.It is recommended that the Chinese Academy of Sciences do not get it again. It is really a joke to get it.

(15) 讚！ | jfj

The Chinese Academy of Sciences should not engage in any more partitions.A journal does not look good at the impact factor. The partition can only be a reference. The most important thing is the word-of-mouth and recognition of the journal in the peer. This cannot be quantified.Dividing the journals into three or six chapters by partition is actually a simple and rude way.It is recommended that the Chinese Academy of Sciences do not get it again. It is really a joke to get it.

(0) 讚！ | jfj

I believe that the best papers in the field of information theory are given priority to this journal.

(4) 讚！ | Anonymous

If the journal is a three-zone, what journals are in the first district and the second district?First, the impact factor of journals is the denominator of the number of papers in the past two years. These papers are calculated by the number of citations.However, many of the journals in the sixties and seventies of the journals that are based on basic theory are still being cited. These are not counted in the journal's influence!Sometimes the impact factor of a journal really doesn't mean anything, or it depends on the recognition of peers.I believe that the best papers in the field of information theory are given priority to this journal. The Chinese Academy of Sciences division is a complete joke!!

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

tried it several times.Finally, there is hope again.The second trial came back to minor repairs.I used to select for this journal and then went to TCOM, basically all.The Chinese Academy of Sciences actually put it in three districts.....The

(4) 讚！ | 雪寒

tried it several times.Finally, there is hope again.The second trial came back to minor repairs.I used to select for this journal and then went to TCOM, basically all.The Chinese Academy of Sciences actually put it in three districts.....

(0) 讚！ | 雪寒

is still in the second revision, taking time out, but it is really wondering because the impact factor has been dropped to the 3rd district?This is much more difficult than what TSP TC TWC is, and the reviewer is extremely responsible and pursuing the details.Anyway, people in the field understand the quality and difficulty of this journal.

(2) 讚！ | SZhu