Approaching

(0) 讚！ | Eaton_1129

I spent four months dealing with two reviewers in the first round of review and 31 days in the second round, but it is still under review (UR).

(0) 讚！ | Eaton_1129

It's too slow now. I submitted it on July 1st and still haven't heard anything. I asked in October and was told it's under expert review. I was asked to wait and the status has been undergoing review.

(0) 讚！ | letPaper111

No letter.

(0) 讚！ | 卡多希

1112 With Editor for Decision

(0) 讚！ | zzz:)

I don't know if the submission has been sent for external review.

(0) 讚！ | steven

Yes, I want to know if you have been waiting for five months.

(0) 讚！ | steven

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | steven

Is there still no message?

(0) 讚！ | steven

Same question? I also want to know how long the first instance will take.

(0) 讚！ | steven

How are you? Have you submitted it for review?

(0) 讚！ | steven

How have you been?

(0) 讚！ | steven

I also want to know, I have seen a lot, but it has always been the same, how are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | steven

Is there a result now?

(0) 讚！ | Eaton_1129

Okay.

(0) 讚！ | Longe

It's better not to rush, it's useless even if you rush.

(0) 讚！ | letPaper111

Can the Undergoing within three months be expedited, bosses?

(0) 讚！ | Longe

May I ask how long your first instance review will take?

(0) 讚！ | 卡多希

It has been three weeks since the minor submitted their revisions and still no outcome, is it in danger?

(0) 讚！ | 依古比古茗

Have you received any news yet? I applied in early September, but haven't heard anything.

(0) 讚！ | 卡多希

Do I need to include an author biography for my first submission?

(0) 讚！ | accept_lucky

Does anyone know if TGRS allows the expansion of already submitted conference papers?

(0) 讚！ | Mr.Nobody

How many reviewers are there? Why is it so slow? It's been a month and there's been no progress at all.

(0) 讚！ | zzz:)

Did the first review take five months with two reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | Longe

Submitted in early January, the first review took more than 5 months, with major revisions required. The second review lasted more than 2 months, resulting in a total of 10 months of review time. There were delays due to personal reasons, and the editing process was slow due to the need to incorporate the latest algorithms, for which there was limited publicly available code, requiring rerunning experiments once found.

(0) 讚！ | shendazt