The pre-coding direction I submitted was submitted at 10 pm on May 21st, and the response received on May 22nd exceeded the scope

(0) 讚！ | 旅行者

Do you have any rejected articles that are beyond the scope? How long does it usually take to receive a rejection response?

(0) 讚！ | guo776

After submission, the status will be under review. What will it change to if an ADM is invited or enters the review stage?

(0) 讚！ | guo776

The review speed was moderate, the comments from the reviewers were very constructive, and there was a clear improvement after revisions. It took around 8 months from submission to acceptance. The timeline is as follows:
May 2023: Submit, Awaiting Assignment (Under Review the same day)
August 2023: Major Revision
October 2023: Resubmit
Early December 2023: Minor Revision
Late December 2023: Resubmit
Late January 2024: Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | ZXNzxn1

I missed the deadline for submitting a major revision because I didn't have time to send it back. The submission system was closed. Later, I contacted the editor and they reopened the system. It should be possible to email the editor with valid reasons

(0) 讚！ | Anthony_BUAA

Has anyone requested an additional two weeks for revisions after receiving a Major Revision?

(0) 讚！ | CharlieNie

Has anyone requested more than two weeks for revisions after being given a Major revision?

(0) 讚！ | CharlieNie

The impact factor of 4.4 has dropped to Zone 3 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. I wonder what's going on with this journal, it used to be in Zone 2 for several years, even though it's not Trans

(0) 讚！ | AlexCoder

2023.06.29 under review
2023.11.16 major revision Three experts have given at least 31 comments, incisive and admirable.
2024.01.05 major revision Modified version has been submitted

(0) 讚！ | Eno-Z

Submitted two papers in 23 years. One was submitted in early February and rejected in mid-August. The other was submitted in early April, revised in early August, and accepted in early January of the following year. The review speed feels average and is related to the quality of the manuscript. For the first paper, there were five reviewers, with controversial opinions due to the average quality, and it was ultimately rejected. For the second paper, three reviewers had relatively positive opinions, with one providing more than ten suggestions. The review quality for both papers was good, with a well-rounded summary and insightful pointers on the issues, greatly helping with the manuscript quality

(2) 讚！ | Anthony_BUAA

The review process is too slow

(2) 讚！ | ZZHUANG

2023.06.29 under review
2023.11.16 major revision Three experts provided at least 31 comments, insightful and admirable

(7) 讚！ | Eno-Z

12-Sep-2023 Submitted
31-Oct-2023 ADM under review
20-Dec-2023 Major Revision
22-Jan-2024 Major Revision Submission
15-Mar-2024 Minor Revision
23-Mar-2024 Minor Revision Submission
15-Apr-2024 AC

(0) 讚！ | ZZHUANG

2023.06.29 Under Review

(1) 讚！ | Eno-Z

12-dec-2022 original submission - December 12, 2022 original submission
27-mar-2023 under review - March 27, 2023 under review
30-mar-2023 major revision - March 30, 2023 major revision
12-may-2023 revision submitted to journal - May 12, 2023 revision submitted to journal
12-Jul-2023 minor revision - July 12, 2023 minor revision
18-Jul-2023 revision submitted to journal - July 18, 2023 revision submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | 横二小辣鸡

12-dec-2022 original submission - December 12th, 2022 original submission
27-mar-2023 under review - March 27th, 2023 under review
30-mar-2023 major revision - March 30th, 2023 major revision
12-may-2023 revision submitted to journal - May 12th, 2023 revision submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | 横二小辣鸡

Is there a limit to the number of pages for the initial draft?

(0) 讚！ | GXUmin

12-dec-2022 original submission
27-mar-2023 under review
30-mar-2023 major revision
12-june-2023 revision submitted to journal

Translation:
12th December 2022 - Original submission
27th March 2023 - Under review
30th March 2023 - Major revision
12th June 2023 - Revision submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | 横二小辣鸡

Share the timeline of the recent submission to IEEE Syst. J. The submission process took 9 months from submission to acceptance, with a total of 3 reviewers.
16 June 2022: Submitted
19 August 2022: Major revision
19 October 2022: Resubmitted
30 December 2022: Major revision
7 February 2023: Resubmitted
6 March 2023: Minor revision
9 March 2023: Resubmitted
26 March 2023: Accepted
IEEE Syst. J. is well recognized in the field of systems engineering. Overall, the journal is good, but the reviewers are strict and require substantial theoretical proof.

(2) 讚！ | Runx

The word "update:6.11" does not have a direct translation into English as it seems to be a specific term or code related to technology or software. Therefore, it is not possible to provide an accurate translation without further context. However, the word "accept" translates to "aceptar" in Spanish.

(0) 讚！ | 做多中国

The situation is the same, two major incidents. Have you received any updates?

(0) 讚！ | 小徐子子

Can I still send the second-hand items directly?

(0) 讚！ | Uaremyinspiration

5.31 is still UR, urging for the manuscript is useless, only ADM is in contact.

(0) 讚！ | 做多中国

May I ask, after the third review is completed, what changes are there in the system status for acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | 做多中国

2022-08-08  Submission
2022-10-17  Major revision: There were a total of five reviewers who provided 18 suggestions for revisions.
2022-11-11  First revision made
2022-12-25  Major revision: Two reviewers still have comments, one reviewer requests the addition of a comparative experiment, and another reviewer has unclear parts in the paper and requests detailed explanations.
2023-01-31  Second revision made
2023-02-27  Minor revision: Request to add a Remark
2023-03-23  Third revision made
2023-04-03  Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 顾玖