Do you know the website address for the ScholarOne system of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | nahduheduedyvbd

May I ask if there are any results yet? Mine is in the same condition.

(0) 讚！ | 不期而遇

It's been almost 5 days stuck on Awaiting Decision, what's going on? Normally, this step shouldn't take more than a day or two, do we need to follow up?

(0) 讚！ | BlueRose

11.12-11.13 under review
12.11 Reject and resubmission
------------------
1.07 Under Review
1.28 Major review
------------------
2.12 Under Review
3.04 Minor review
------------------
3.05 Under Review
3.25 Accept

(1) 讚！ | 代号table

Recording the first bumpy journey:
23-08-10: Submit
23-10-01: Decision: Reject & Resubmit
23-12-30: Resubmit
24-02-07: Decision: Major Revision
24-03-08: Revision Submit
24-03-08: Awaiting Reviewers Selection
24-03-18: Awaiting Reviewers Scores
24-03-30: Awaiting AE Recommendation
24-04-07: Awaiting Decision
24-04-07: Decision: Accept

(0) 讚！ | microxx

TMTT's sub-journal, limited to 3 pages, is really fast. It takes a little over a month for major revisions, and about a month for minor revisions after major revisions are completed. Acceptance is then within a week.

Both reviewers are very professional, giving around ten suggestions for major revisions, as well as pointing out language issues

(0) 讚！ | linsang

The layout fee can be voluntarily chosen.

(0) 讚！ | Zws_2019

May I ask if this journal has no page charges?

(0) 讚！ | 傲意

Does this journal not have a publication fee?

(0) 讚！ | 傲意

Authoritative journals, professional review comments, and a relatively difficult submission process.

(5) 讚！ | Zws_2019

2022-4.25 Submission
2022-7.11 Rejection and resubmission. Sent an email in between asking the editor why the status hasn't changed. Received a response saying they couldn't find a suitable reviewer and had to find a new one.
2022-7.28 Resubmission after making modifications.
2022.9.2 Acceptance
The whole process took 4 and a half months. The rejection and resubmission had more formatting issues. One reviewer suggested accepting it directly, one suggested minor revisions, and one required additional explanations and data, but all were relatively easy. Overall, the review process took too long. The difficulty was not significant, and I have already submitted a second article.

(1) 讚！ | Recker

Rejected, then submitted to the previous 2nd-tier journal, already accepted and published.

(0) 讚！ | 希望如此

Thank you for your reply! I submitted once last year, and there were only two reviewers. There weren't many comments from the reviewers, but the comments from the associate editor felt more extensive than those from a single reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 大开大海

It has been twenty days since the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection". Why is it taking so long for the direction millimeter-wave filter?

(0) 讚！ | yutian0228

I work with millimeter waves. There were three reviewers, and the review process took three weeks.

(0) 讚！ | wangrt

May I ask what field the expert is working in?
It seems that the projects you are involved in yield results in less than a month, so fast! The first one got results, and the second one was immediately submitted. I submitted a project last year, and it took over three months to get results, but it was rejected. It makes me hesitant to submit again. However, seeing how quickly you have achieved results with both projects, I am once again in a dilemma.

(0) 讚！ | 大开大海

First time writing, lacking experience, so there was a major revision and a minor revision.

(0) 讚！ | GG

2022.3.10 submitted
2022.3.10 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.3.18 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.4.1 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.4.4 awaiting decision
2022.4.5 minor revision
2022.4.7 submitted
2022.4.7 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.4.21 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.4.24 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.5.6 awaiting decision
2022.5.6 accept

Translation:
2022.3.10 submitted
2022.3.10 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.3.18 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.4.1 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.4.4 awaiting decision
2022.4.5 minor revision
2022.4.7 submitted
2022.4.7 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.4.21 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.4.24 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.5.6 awaiting decision
2022.5.6 accept

(5) 讚！ | wangrt

3.11 Submission
3.15 Under review
3.30 AE recommendation
4.1 Minor revision
4.19 Revised
5.6 Accept

(1) 讚！ | chensi567

2022.1.15 submitted
2022.1.16 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.1.23 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.2.13 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.2.22 awaiting decision
2022.2.23 minor revision
2022.3.1 submitted
2022.3.1 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.3.7 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.3.17 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.3.27 awaiting decision
2022.3.27 accept

Translated:

2022.1.15 submitted
2022.1.16 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.1.23 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.2.13 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.2.22 awaiting decision
2022.2.23 minor revision
2022.3.1 submitted
2022.3.1 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.3.7 awaiting reviewer scores
2022.3.17 awaiting AE recommendation
2022.3.27 awaiting decision
2022.3.27 accept

(7) 讚！ | wangrt

How are you doing? How long will it take in total?

(0) 讚！ | 大开大海

Did you submit it for the first time and it took six months to be accepted? Did you revise it twice?

(0) 讚！ | 大开大海

Hello, have you really accepted it for two months? I asked when it was one month after I submitted last year, and they replied that they were waiting for a reviewer. It took more than three months to complete, and they even rejected it. I'm a bit hesitant to submit to them again. AWPL is said to be faster, but it seems like they have higher requirements. It's not easy to handle.

(0) 讚！ | 大开大海

Repair once, return for review and acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 我从风中来

Direction is a passive device and has been published twice. The first submission took 6 months from submission to acceptance, while the second took 4 months. Overall, as long as the quality of your journal is guaranteed, the editor will send it for review directly. The first review process takes less than 35 days, and generally requires major revisions. This journal is very strict and also of a high standard! The suggestions given by the Associate Editor each time are very professional and important. The reviewers also have unique perspectives, and their suggestions greatly improve the overall quality of the article!

(1) 讚！ | GG