Two weeks after submission, the editor provided feedback and requested major revisions. The feedback was helpful and constructive, with the reviewer expressing interest in my research and finding it very interesting. Overall, AGSS receives many submissions each year, but only a very small number are accepted, with emphasis placed on the novelty of the content.

(0) 讚！ | 上好佳

It's been three months now. The initial review took one month, and when the editor submitted it for review, they contacted six reviewers. However, none of them responded, so they left it there without further action. Even after reminders, the official response was that they were still looking for reviewers. Since the first submission on May 6th, they haven't found a seventh reviewer yet.

(0) 讚！ | CC12

5-21 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | 苗大侠

The progress is slow, and it's still "with editor" after one month

(0) 讚！ | yaking

The main reason for the twisty process is still the content of the first attempt in the new field, leading to some errors in the methods. Overall, the editing speed is quite fast, and the attitude is very friendly and constructive. AgSy has a low volume of articles, and although the impact factor is lower than that of environmental journals, the quality and recognition are very high. The journal emphasizes mechanism and novelty. Systematic and diverse research in agriculture can be attempted

(0) 讚！ | GFX

2022/8/17 submitted to journal. 2022/8/18 with editor. 2022/8/19 under review. 2022/9/26 required review completed. 2022/9/29 reject. Three reviewers, one of whom was a major, all recognized the value of the data but identified major errors in the methodology. They recommended revisions and the editor allowed for resubmission.
2023/3/5 modified algorithm and resubmitted. 2023/3/5 with editor. 2023/3/11 under review. 2023/4/20 required review completed. 2023/4/26 minor. 2023/5/13 resubmitted. 2023/5/13 with editor. 2023/5/18 minor. The editor still believed that the language needed further improvement, so further revisions were made. 2023/5/23 resubmitted. 2023/5/24 with editor. 2023/5/26 accept

(2) 讚！ | GFX

2023-03-29 submitted to journal

Translation: The document was submitted to the journal on March 29, 2023.

(0) 讚！ | slfzhc

Can all fields in agricultural engineering submit to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 硕士

The initial review took about three months, and major revision was recommended. After half a month after revised submission, the moderate revision was recommended. The editor required a minor revision on the day of resubmission. It was accepted five days after submission of minor revisions. It was submitted on December 21 and accepted on April 21. I think the speed was normal.

(2) 讚！ | 笑得合不拢嘴

Editing efficiency is very low. Two reviewers required major revisions, but were rejected by the editor, which is a bit unprofessional.

(1) 讚！ | 上好佳

It has been with editor for one week, and there is no change. Why?

(0) 讚！ | 上好佳

has been submiting for 9 months, the first trial has not come back, there should be news in these days.The

(0) 讚！ | qjmwilson

Ugh. Submitted my manuscript, STILL waiting 5 months later. Of course, there is no news yet. Boy do I love seeing the phrase “under review.” Review time is super long.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

does not need any layout fees and review fees.Latest Impact Factor: 2.906

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名