期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | ICARUS LetPub Score 6.4
51 ratings
Rate
Reputation 6.3 Influence 5.9 Speed 8.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | ICARUS | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0019-1035 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1090-2643 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 16.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/icarus/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/ICARUS | ||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Academic Press Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 地学天文 | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1962 | ||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 328每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 52.49% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0019-1035%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Fast, 2-4 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[ICARUS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: boss ke 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-27 01:47:35 評論於 I really can't agree with that. I recently reviewed a paper, the data was good, but the writing was terrible, there was no proper discussion. Personally, I would position this journal below CG, JGR, and MAPS, but above EPSL, GRL, GCA, ApJ-AA-MNRAS. The impact factor is only 2.4, which really says something. So I encourage the authors to revise and resubmit. The editorial process may be quick, and we as reviewers are punctual, with the first review within a month, and the final acceptance of the article in just over two months. As for what the OP said about being better than NC, I suggest they first publish a paper in NC.(2) 讚! | boss ke |
作者: @zjh 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-11-20 16:25:53 評論於 Are there usually three reviewers for a manuscript?(0) 讚! | @zjh |
作者: heywego 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-09-17 13:31:42 評論於 Already submitted revised acceptance, the time frame is similar to what was mentioned downstairs, around six months. In our research field (Planetary Science), many influential researchers have published multiple articles in Icarus, so we have decided to submit to Icarus. The reviewers are quite professional and their feedback greatly helps improve the quality of the article. In the field of Planetary Science, the prominent journals include Nature sub-journals, several AGU journals such as GRL, GCA, EPSL, Elsvier's Icarus, JGR Planets, etc.(29) 讚! | heywego |
作者: 心情不错 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2021-09-08 12:16:30 評論於 Regarding this magazine, it is better to listen to the opinions of those in the field. The review period is definitely not 2-3 weeks but generally 3-4 months, depending on major or minor revisions. The second review usually takes around 7 days to three months. Additionally, this magazine focuses on planetary science (I myself study the moon). This field is relatively small, so the reviewers are mostly top experts in this specific area. Two out of my three reviewers are Benjamin Greenhagen and Bruce Hapke, who respectively published in the prestigious science journal about Diviner and are the founders of the Hapke model. Therefore, there are two possible outcomes: first, this journal provides an opportunity to communicate with top scholars worldwide, but your article must be nearly flawless, at least in the reviewers' research areas. Second, this journal will greatly enhance the quality of your article, achieving a level that cannot be compared to domestic journals (Will domestic academicians review your article?). Thus, if you study planetary science, this journal is a good choice, much better than nature communications, but I am unsure about other research fields. Additionally, since new research emerged in my field during the submission period, I actually submitted my manuscript twice, totaling over 3 years. Please consider for yourselves whether this journal is good or not. Furthermore, this journal was upgraded from Tier 3 to Tier 2 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in the past few years, which confirms my viewpoint. Just think about which journals were downgraded and you will understand.(161) 讚! | 心情不错 |
作者: yilanduo 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-05-28 17:08:28 評論於 How did they come up with the speed on this? Misleading people, everyone around says the average cycle is half a year, and the review process takes two to three months.(6) 讚! | yilanduo |
作者: da 猪 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2019-08-19 14:41:35 評論於 I don’t know how this review speed is 2–4 weeks. I browsed the official website; the average cycle of an article took half a year! (0) 讚! | da 猪 |
作者: myEl 領域: 数理科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2017-08-24 11:46:11 評論於 Top journal, Icarus influence is even bigger than Planet. (2) 讚! | myEl |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us