Brother, how are you doing now? I changed the editor 6 days after submitting, and it has been half a month now, still with editor

(0) 讚！ | 天津大麻花

AFM in the field of flux is equivalent to SBB in the field of soil, at the same level, that is, the industry recognized as the first, mainly very professional, with a very stable impact factor 5 or even 8 years ago, a particularly classic journal, industry recognized (many agricultural and forestry university journals are also classified as the first echelon, excluding CNS), strict review, and manuscript quantity always under control (which is also the reason why the impact factor does not increase). In the long run, it is very worth investing in and will become popular like GCB sooner or later

(8) 讚！ | 火鸡味锅巴

AFM is at least on par with SBB, or even higher, especially in numerical simulation and theoretical research. The level of AFM is very high.
However, the two journals are in different fields, with SBB being more focused on soil chemistry, experiments, and statistical analysis. AFM is more focused on atmospheric modeling, usually studying larger scales

(2) 讚！ | ysalc

This is harder to catch than SBB

(1) 讚！ | 阿hao1

The overlapping submission goals of these two journals are not very high, they are not in the same direction, and their comparability is not high. The top journal SBB Soil Science tends to focus on small-scale soil biology and biochemistry, while the top journal AFM Agriculture and Forestry tends to focus on large-scale meteorology, agriculture, and forestry interactions. There aren't so many levels, exaggerating with several levels is too much. If forced to compare, SBB is about half a level better than AFM, and AFM is about half a level better than Geoderma. It's about the same

(0) 讚！ | 温柔善良帅气

Do you mean that SBB is slightly better than Geodeoma or AFM is slightly better than Geoderma?

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Can someone please explain to me what it means when the date on a publication with the editor changes? Does it mean the editor-in-chief has been replaced, or the editorial direction has changed? Or is it a sign of impending rejection? I'm so nervous ?

(0) 讚！ | 努力的蜗牛

SBB should be better than this, probably a little better than Geoderma

(0) 讚！ | 挖土人dou

Hey guys, is this magazine similar to Soil Biology and Bichemistry, but slightly better than Geoderma?

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

GPP + forest remote sensing, the initial review will be in two weeks, just submitted for external review, hoping to be accepted

(0) 讚！ | ddssew

Mar 25, 2024. With Editor

(0) 讚！ | wwwsanw

Are you still working on this with edit?

(0) 讚！ | wwwsanw

Submitted to Journal on Mar 21, 2024

(0) 讚！ | wwwsanw

August 31, 2023, Submitted to Journal
September 7, 2023, under review
January 10, 2024, major revision
January 22, 2024, revision submitted
March 8, 2024, moderate revision
March 14, 2024, revision submitted
March 17, 2024, accepted

(0) 讚！ | byyourside

Submission on January 14, 2024
With edits on January 18

(0) 讚！ | 小团子在吃饭

How long have you been with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | jia

Just got accepted and I'm very excited. I've checked multiple times when I was anxious before. Now I'm sharing my submission process here, hoping it will help everyone.

2022.11.09 Submitted
2023.5.30 First review
2023.7.10 Major revision
2023.9.3 Major revision resubmission
2023.11.16 Minor revision
2023.11.23 Minor revision resubmission
2023.11.30 Accepted

(2) 讚！ | Xerbao

When a paper is submitted for review, an email is usually sent to the corresponding author to notify them that the submission has been received. The email contains a link (with tracking) where you can check

(0) 讚！ | 他们叫我龙

How did you know how many reviewers the editor invited for you?

(0) 讚！ | YYYM

How did you see that the editor invited several reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | YYYM

Before the deadline of 10.04, an additional reviewer who had not previously accepted agreed to review. Currently, there are three reviewers, and the editor has not invited any more reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 他们叫我龙

9.25 under review. The editor has invited 2 reviewers and hopes that everything goes smoothly, giving a chance for revision

(0) 讚！ | 他们叫我龙

9.18 with editor Patience is key, hoping the editor will give us a chance to review!

(0) 讚！ | 他们叫我龙

Hello, how long does the first review rejection usually take? Or how long does it usually take to send for review?

(0) 讚！ | cwn

Hello, have you submitted your paper for review?

(0) 讚！ | cwn