Submitted at the end of July 2024, currently undergoing major revisions, with overall feedback not exceeding 3 pages.

(0) 讚！ | kew

I have already written four reminder letters, but they are completely useless as none of the editors have responded. If there is no response by the beginning of next month, I plan to write directly to the editor-in-chief. Even if I am rejected, I will still express my anger!

(0) 讚！ | garyhzy0418

Please translate the following paragraph into English: None

(3) 讚！ | 王小辣

The submission made on January 21, 2014 is still under review. Twenty-two reviewers were invited, three accepted the review invitation, but only one provided feedback. Two reminders have been sent, both of which received official responses. Is there any solution to this situation?

(0) 讚！ | garyhzy0418

Having been rejected and resubmitted, it has been three months since the resubmission. In the past month, there have been no invitations from the reviewers on WeChat, and there have been no changes. Should I consider following up on the submission?

(0) 讚！ | 云一尺

It seems that the edited version was sent for external review on the first day after the changes were made, and the subsequent reviews were also quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | 努力的蜗牛

It has been submitted for review, and it will be returned for revisions within two months after the external review.

(0) 讚！ | 努力的蜗牛

Will all authors receive a confirmation email after submitting to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | Nicloe

My manuscript has been with the editor for a month, and it still hasn't been submitted for review. Looks like there's no hope.

(0) 讚！ | gwq9975

It has been a month with the editor, still no response. How about yours?

(0) 讚！ | gwq9975

Teachers speak highly of the journal, believing it is a leader in the field. My manuscript is still under external review, and I am not sure what the acceptance rate will be.

(0) 讚！ | zzz5454

Brother, how are you doing now? I changed the editor 6 days after submitting, and it has been half a month now, still with editor

(0) 讚！ | 天津大麻花

AFM in the field of flux is equivalent to SBB in the field of soil, at the same level, that is, the industry recognized as the first, mainly very professional, with a very stable impact factor 5 or even 8 years ago, a particularly classic journal, industry recognized (many agricultural and forestry university journals are also classified as the first echelon, excluding CNS), strict review, and manuscript quantity always under control (which is also the reason why the impact factor does not increase). In the long run, it is very worth investing in and will become popular like GCB sooner or later

(8) 讚！ | 火鸡味锅巴

AFM is at least on par with SBB, or even higher, especially in numerical simulation and theoretical research. The level of AFM is very high.
However, the two journals are in different fields, with SBB being more focused on soil chemistry, experiments, and statistical analysis. AFM is more focused on atmospheric modeling, usually studying larger scales

(2) 讚！ | ysalc

This is harder to catch than SBB

(1) 讚！ | 阿hao1

The overlapping submission goals of these two journals are not very high, they are not in the same direction, and their comparability is not high. The top journal SBB Soil Science tends to focus on small-scale soil biology and biochemistry, while the top journal AFM Agriculture and Forestry tends to focus on large-scale meteorology, agriculture, and forestry interactions. There aren't so many levels, exaggerating with several levels is too much. If forced to compare, SBB is about half a level better than AFM, and AFM is about half a level better than Geoderma. It's about the same

(0) 讚！ | 温柔善良帅气

Do you mean that SBB is slightly better than Geodeoma or AFM is slightly better than Geoderma?

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Can someone please explain to me what it means when the date on a publication with the editor changes? Does it mean the editor-in-chief has been replaced, or the editorial direction has changed? Or is it a sign of impending rejection? I'm so nervous ?

(0) 讚！ | 努力的蜗牛

SBB should be better than this, probably a little better than Geoderma

(0) 讚！ | 挖土人dou

Hey guys, is this magazine similar to Soil Biology and Bichemistry, but slightly better than Geoderma?

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

GPP + forest remote sensing, the initial review will be in two weeks, just submitted for external review, hoping to be accepted

(0) 讚！ | ddssew

Mar 25, 2024. With Editor

(0) 讚！ | wwwsanw

Are you still working on this with edit?

(0) 讚！ | wwwsanw

Submitted to Journal on Mar 21, 2024

(0) 讚！ | wwwsanw

August 31, 2023, Submitted to Journal
September 7, 2023, under review
January 10, 2024, major revision
January 22, 2024, revision submitted
March 8, 2024, moderate revision
March 14, 2024, revision submitted
March 17, 2024, accepted

(0) 讚！ | byyourside