2023.9.19 submit
2023.11.1 major revision
2023.12.13 a revision has been submitted
2024.3.17 minor revision
2024.3.24 a revision has been submitted
2024.4.8 accept

(1) 讚！ | JAY1168

The magazine demands high innovation, and belongs to the top level journals in the field of hydrology. However, due to the low publication rate in HP from Wiley, it is difficult to submit articles and this affects the impact factor

(0) 讚！ | 论文批发商

Unfortunately, it is now 3rd quarter

(1) 讚！ | jack

What does the status of the two EOS mean after submission?

(0) 讚！ | 大宝

2022.10.29 Submit
2022.12.07 Major Revision (Due Date of Revised Submission: 21-Jan-2023)
2023.02.12 Revised
2023.03.15 Minor Revision (Due Date of Revised Submission: 04-Apr-2023)
2023.03.25 Revised
2023.03.25 Accepted
2023.04.04 Online

The editor was very nice and not only helped me negotiate sufficient time for revisions, but also provided me with a personal email address after the major revision was returned. We discussed the issues with the paper's topic directly via email, avoiding the need for multiple submissions and saving time on the system.

(1) 讚！ | MYJi

Received manuscript id on the 22nd and submitted an additional document. Now it is just waiting, hoping for a good outcome.

(0) 讚！ | Richie

2022/7/12 submitted, received confirmation email immediately. The manuscript number is said to be generated within one working day, but as of 7/20, I haven't received it. Does anyone know what the situation is?

(1) 讚！ | Richie

Two months after submission, there will be a minor revision, and acceptance will be confirmed 1-2 months after the modifications. The process is quite fast.

(6) 讚！ | Luckylv

The submission time is quite long, I don't know if it's because of the pandemic. Some articles that I submitted a few months later were accepted, but this one was just accepted.
May 2020 submit
Sep 2020 revision
Jan 2021 revision
Feb 2021 accept
In my humble opinion, the level of articles on water chemistry in this journal should be on par with JOH.

(22) 讚！ | heiheids

The article has just been accepted, and it feels that the reviewer is very responsible. From the core issues involved in the discussion to the sloppy misspelled words, they are all raised one by one. After one major revision and one minor revision, it takes about 7 months from submission to acceptance. The details are as follows: 2019.3.18, submission; 2019.7.12, major revision required; 2019.8.15, revised submission; 2019.10.15, minor revision required; 2019.10.23, Revised submission; 2019.10.24, accepted; the above is for your reference.

(3) 讚！ | Yuanhong Deng

A major revision was required in the first review. Now it was under revision. The opinions were not too harsh. The journal has high requirements for innovation, and belongs to the top-level hydrological journal.

(15) 讚！ | mcxmcx1234

2018.10.1 Submitted; 2018.11.22 Be rejected and resubmitted; 2018.12.11 Resubmitted; 2019.1.16 Major revision; 2019.1.27 Resubmitted; 2019.3.4 Minor revision; 2019.3.5 Resubmitted; 2019.3.6 Accepted. I think the journal is relatively unpopular. The difficulty should be less than Journal of Hydrology (JOH) and Advances in Water Resources (AWR). Both reviewers and editor were okay. Questions requested by one reviewer were not on the point, and he did a lot of work that beyond the scope of the article itself.

(4) 讚！ | xzw1995

Highly recognized and highly responsible journals in the hydrological fieldThe reviewers of the first-instance and second-instance review were very detailed and put forward a lot of suggestions on the text. The reviewers of the second-instance even printed out the paper version directly on the above, and refined it to the same as the free touch-up

(0) 讚！ | spdgotc

After a select of about four or five months, the editor apologized and said that the reviewer said that the report was not available.So I changed the drafter.After the overhaul.It took eight months to publish a student.I am doing forest research.Compare Lin Xue, the journal of ecology and this hydrological journal.I really feel that hydrological articles are more difficult to issue. Reviewers are very serious and their opinions are more difficult to deal with.In the future, ecological and hydrological articles, I will choose to give priority to the journal of ecology.

(3) 讚！ | EP

top journals, Chinese people account for about 30%, relatively easy than J Hyd, WRR

(1) 讚！ | 贫僧

This publication is included in 2013, don't make a mistake, the journal ISSN is wrong.It should be 1099-1085

(1) 讚！ | 行者

This publication is included in 2013, don't get it wrong

(0) 讚！ | 行者

I just submitted an article, I don’t know what the result is, let’s talk about it. Who can tell me, thank you very much ADM: Blackford, Ian Under Review

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A very good journal in hydrology, the impact factor is also good.Three reviewers, the opinions are more pertinent.Published after the second trial!It takes about 1 year to go online.slower!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

September 29, 2012 Contributions January 29, 2013 Overhaul February 19, 2013 Accepted February 26, 2013 On Line

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

One of the TOP journals of hydrology, the impact factor rises faster, the article's innovation and language requirements are higher.The review speed is relatively slow, and the year is normal. In particular, the first trial generally takes more than half a year, and the second trial is faster.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

17-Feb-2012,receive18-May-2012,Major Revision17-Jun-2012,a revision has been submitted 14-Aug-2012,Minor Revision29-Aug-2012,a revision has beenSubmit30-Aug-2012,accept

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The first trial time is longer, the second trial is very fast

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

No, it’s so slow, I’m depressed now, I selectd for one month, it’s almost a month, or this “Selecting for Review”

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

After four months of reviewing my article, I received a revised version of the PDF version from the editor. I entered the submission system and saw that the above display is "recommendation". I don't know what it means.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名