The size and length of the research results are generally judged by the size of the research and the length of the article

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The general types of research-based SCI articles include Article, Letter, Protocol, and so on

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to Determine the Type of SCI Articles?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

What is the most common type of SCI articles we produce or write in research?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

On the rise, optimistic about the future, what do you all think?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Although the magazine is average, the reviewers have high standards. Two out of three reviewers each provided more than 20 suggestions. They are very meticulous. You can learn a lot from it, it's a good magazine

(0) 讚！ | 泄矢天卉

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: It is said online that this journal is relatively slow, but my article is not urgent anyway, so I tried to submit it. Unexpectedly, the review started just three days after submission, with minor revisions a month later. I delayed my own revisions for more than a month, and it was online about ten days after uploading. It took exactly three months from submission to online, including the additional month of my own revisions. This speed is comparable to BBRC. It seems that rumors are not trustworthy

(0) 讚！ | Clare Hamilton

Review Speed: 12.0
Experience Sharing: It's misleading to display the review speed as 4 months in the system. The review cycle of this journal is the longest I have ever seen. I submitted an article in March 2015, and it is still "with editor" until now, without being sent for external review. It has been a whole year, the gestation period of a baby. One editor actually spent a year reading the article. I sent more than 10 reminder emails to the editor, but received no response. Anyway, I am not counting on this article anymore. Consider it as wasted. I just want to remind everyone not to submit to this journal anymore. You can decide for yourselves. This journal is likely going to close down

(0) 讚！ | 香风之彤

Submitted on December 20, 2015; currently March 22, 2016, the status is with editor, but there has been no response to my emails to the editor. I am considering withdrawing the submission, as I no longer feel passionate about it

(0) 讚！ | 伏魔慧云

Submitted in December 2014, revised in June 2015, uploaded revised manuscript in August, currently with editor, many of the online articles in this journal were submitted a year ago

(0) 讚！ | Theresa Edward

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The review was submitted in March this year, revised about 3 weeks later, given half a year to make modifications, took 4 months for revisions, and was accepted a month after revisions

(0) 讚！ | 鹏鲸小娘子

Submitted on May 26th, it is now September 21st, and the status is "with editor". It hasn't even been sent for review yet, and there has been no reply from the editor. Just like that~

(0) 讚！ | 猫巷少女沈思

Review speed: 12.0
Experience sharing: My senior sister submitted to this journal, received a response in half a year, and got accepted after another half year. I submitted in early November 2014, urged for progress once and the status changed to "with editor" in February. I urged for progress again in June, and received a reply saying they will review as soon as possible. It's now July, and the status is still "with editor". I feel like withdrawing the submission

(0) 讚！ | Nat Temple

The review process took over two months. Even though it was a minor revision, each reviewer provided nearly 20 detailed and targeted comments, some even requesting original data. They even pointed out inappropriate citations in one of the references, showing their thoroughness

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

An article was just published in January this year, submitted in December 2011 and revised in February 2012. There were nearly 20 suggested revisions in the comments, very detailed. The revised manuscript was uploaded in July and published online in August

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted on October 10, 2012
Received major revisions comments on November 15, 2012, requested to submit revisions by June 15
Revised manuscript with 4 pages of revisions and comments from 4 reviewers uploaded on June 13
Submitted to journal until July 7
Under review with editor on July 8
Accepted on July 19
Proofread on July 29
Published online on August 10

(0) 讚！ | 天际润茁

Submitted on November 15th, 2012. Receive major revision, with requested to return of June 15. 4 pages of replies to 4 reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

It's been over 20 days since I submitted my manuscript, why is it still in status "with editor"?

(0) 讚！ | Isabel Jackson

Help: Does this magazine charge for publication? How much is it? How long does it take from submission to publication? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 黑山亚楠

Can we make it to the top 3 next year? Let's discuss

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The result came out in less than a month after being rejected

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃弘致

Why am I still "with editor" after submitting for 20 days? It's so slow!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

I have been under review for over two months and still haven't heard anything! My boss submitted a paper last year and had to follow up three times before finally receiving a response after six months. However, the feedback from the reviewers was very good and specific, with three pages of comments. After supplementing the experiment according to the feedback and resubmitting, it was accepted in less than a week

(0) 讚！ | 无定浩渺

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Submitted on August 5th, received feedback on October 29th with three suggestions, mostly minor issues like unclear graphics or explanations. One comment was more detailed, providing a thorough explanation to the journal and additional experiments. Revised on February 3rd after additional experiments (almost doubling the original workload), officially accepted on February 9th

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

I have been under review for a month

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁