The initial review is very fast, Swiss, very strict, pretty good journal.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Submitted by e-mail in mid-July 2012, received a paper manuscript from the editorial department in mid-September, and then sent it back after a week of minor repair, and then edited the e-mail for another week.Said to accept, and gave the DOI number, but now in mid-December, the DOI number can not be found in the DOI system, the article has not been cleaned, and I don't know when to wait until I expect it to be published soon...However, they are really serious and responsible. The paper manuscripts sent by the pencils have been drawn with every mistake and have been modified. I admire it!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

In fact, one month after I selectd, the editorial department had notified by mail, but I did not receive it because of the reason of the mail room. After 3 months, I asked about it, and the editorial departmentI sent it by e-mail. The article was received on October 5th, but why didn't I receive the proof after one month?Is everyone's proof of mailing or email notification?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

11Email submitted on December 2nd, and soon received the January 25th review of the paper version of the review (overhaul) returned to Beijing, due to winter vacation, February 7I received it only after I opened it. It was found to be the reviewer’s revision opinion and specific modification rules. It was the original version and was drawn with a pencil. It was very detailed. After the modification (weekly), I sent it back to the middle of May to return to the second review.Opinion (EMAIL), agree to receive the sample on June 20th (EMAIL), the day after the modification is sent back to July 11th page page summary: This journal still uses paper modification opinions, resulting in a very waste of time, it is recommended that graduates like articles urgently neededDon't select for this journal if you graduated;

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I have a manuscript for about two months, and there is no news at all. It is really anxious!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I am an electronic manuscript for direct submitment.A reviewer was received about a month later and the paper version was sent back.Said that it is not suitable for the journal, so sad reminder.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Feel that this journal has a unique style preference, and the writing format is strange and cumbersome. My version was sent on January 21st. On January 25th, the editor-in-chief wrote that the manuscript had been received. But in the next two months, there was no news .On March 24th, I sent the first reminder letter. The next day, the editor-in-chief wrote that my manuscript was transferred from one reviewer to another reviewer. This took another two months! On April 16th, I sent a second reminder letter with a more disgruntled mood. The editor's reply was very interesting. He said that my manuscript had been reviewed and it was sent back on April 4, but I never received it.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal homepage: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2675

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is relatively easy, you need to mail the paper manuscript, the review is strict

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The editor of the journal is very responsible for reviewing the manuscript. The submission is also based on the traditional mailing method, which is quite special.Personally feel that the format of the manuscript is too different from other journals. Whether writing a manuscript or a modification, it must be done in a unique way that the journal requires.If you are rejected, I am afraid that the manuscript will have to be rewritten to meet the requirements of other journals.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Founded by the Swiss Chemical Society in 1918 and has one of the highest Impact Factors amongst chemistry journals. The papers published in this renowned journal cover all areas of chemistry (including medicinal andBiological chemistry).

(0) 讚！ | 匿名