On October 2, 2024, in peer review, looking forward to good luck.

(0) 讚！ | AlenFang

2024.10.01 Revise reference format and send email to editor.
2024.10.02 Editor updated the manuscript in the system, still in With Editor status.

(0) 讚！ | AlenFang

2024.09.25 submitted to the journal
2024.09.26 initial assessment
2024.09.30 with editor
Hoping for a review, this is my second submission to GC.

(0) 讚！ | AlenFang

Share the experience:
2023-9-25 submitted
2023-10-5 with reviewers
2023-10-20 Two reviewers, one major revision and one rejection, editor gave reject and resubmit
2023-12-7 Resubmitted
2024-1-29 Still the same two reviewers, one agreed to accept, the other still insisted on rejection (speechless), finally editor found a third reviewer, final opinion minor revision
2024-1-31 Revised
2024-2-1 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 那是真的困

9.15 Submit and initial review
9.16 Editing process

Further updates will be provided as progress is made.

(0) 讚！ | up

Has it been submitted for final review?

(0) 讚！ | Hjftb

Just wanted to ask if a proposal is required for submitting a review article to Green Chemistry.

(0) 讚！ | christine11

20240708 minor revision
0709 returned, immediately in peer review
May I ask how many days it will take to receive after the minor revision is sent back? There is only one reviewer left with one question.

(0) 讚！ | paradiseandy

The data availability statement is not asking where your data comes from, but rather how others can access and use your data. So, there is usually an option such as "available upon request" to indicate that others can use the data with permission.

(0) 讚！ | duskiller

Please accept (09-Jul-2024)

(0) 讚！ | duskiller

Hello, I would like to ask how to write a data availability statement, as the data was obtained from experiments.

(0) 讚！ | Vicic

Two reviewers, to be honest, the reviewing process is quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | duskiller

6.21 Minor Revision
6.21 小幅修订

(0) 讚！ | duskiller

2024.5.30 initial assessment.
2024.6.3 In peer review (without editor

(0) 讚！ | duskiller

2024.5.25: checking submission and files
2024.5.27: initial assessment
2024.5.28: with editor

(0) 讚！ | okkkkkk23333

How long does the general initial assessment last?

(0) 讚！ | 昕希

How many days did you stay in Initial assessment? How long did it take to become in peer view?

(0) 讚！ | guojm

2.16 Submission
3.11 Major revision
4.09 Resubmission
4.22 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 长岛加冰

Should we re-submit to the same reviewer or a new one after major revisions? It largely depends on the novelty of the work content, the recognition of the handling editor and journal's theme, which is a bit mystical. 
After the second acceptance, it took around ten days for the editorial office to send the copy-editing email, and the feedback was very detailed. During this time, the production editor will verify the appropriateness of each reference cited in the manuscript

(0) 讚！ | 勤火燎原

Submitted on 20240109, the first round of review and assessment usually takes about a week before sending for evaluation. Returned on 20240229, one accepted with minor revisions, and one rejected. Then the editor provided major revisions, which took 6 weeks. Due to some delay in between, it took a few extra days. Following the suggestions, all the logical connections and content structure were modified accordingly. Later, the reference format and supporting information were also adjusted to fit the journal's requirements. After replying on 20240308, the editor took responsibility to clarify the main issues raised and resubmitted the revised manuscript. Now, waiting for the second round of review, possibly involving a third reviewer. Received the decision from the editor on 2040419, which completely accepted the manuscript. 
Green Chemistry, as a well-established journal of RSC, is rigorous and meticulous, though a bit slow. The editors verify the information thoroughly and the format is matured. The first submission to Green Chemistry last year was recognized as one of the popular articles of 2023. This is the second submission from both the individual and the research group, hoping it will also be considered for the popular articles of 2024. Appreciating the hard work of the journal editors and reviewers, wishing Green Chemistry continued success

(1) 讚！ | 勤火燎原

Hey, I also applied again. Hopefully, good luck

(0) 讚！ | 杰尼龟101

Is a reject and resubmit assigned to the original reviewer? My resubmission was in the hands of the reviewer for a week and then returned to the editor, but tracking shows no reviewer? I don't understand

(0) 讚！ | AAraya

Should we resubmit rejected papers to the same reviewer or find a new one?

(0) 讚！ | AAraya

Many thanks to Dr. Konoya Das for editing, and the reviewers were also very professional. Their comments on the revision were very helpful in improving the quality of the article. Here is a detailed summary of the submission process:
Submitted on January 10th, sent for review one week later, major revisions on February 21st.
Revision returned on March 13th, received revision comments on March 22nd, one fully accepted, and one reviewer had two questions.
Revised on March 24th, fully accepted on April 5th

(0) 讚！ | 无形

How long after returning will you accept it?

(0) 讚！ | 无形