2024.5.30 initial assessment.
2024.6.3 In peer review (without editor

(0) 讚！ | duskiller

2024.5.25: checking submission and files
2024.5.27: initial assessment
2024.5.28: with editor

(0) 讚！ | okkkkkk23333

How long does the general initial assessment last?

(0) 讚！ | 昕希

How many days did you stay in Initial assessment? How long did it take to become in peer view?

(0) 讚！ | guojm

2.16 Submission
3.11 Major revision
4.09 Resubmission
4.22 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 长岛加冰

Should we re-submit to the same reviewer or a new one after major revisions? It largely depends on the novelty of the work content, the recognition of the handling editor and journal's theme, which is a bit mystical. 
After the second acceptance, it took around ten days for the editorial office to send the copy-editing email, and the feedback was very detailed. During this time, the production editor will verify the appropriateness of each reference cited in the manuscript

(0) 讚！ | 勤火燎原

Submitted on 20240109, the first round of review and assessment usually takes about a week before sending for evaluation. Returned on 20240229, one accepted with minor revisions, and one rejected. Then the editor provided major revisions, which took 6 weeks. Due to some delay in between, it took a few extra days. Following the suggestions, all the logical connections and content structure were modified accordingly. Later, the reference format and supporting information were also adjusted to fit the journal's requirements. After replying on 20240308, the editor took responsibility to clarify the main issues raised and resubmitted the revised manuscript. Now, waiting for the second round of review, possibly involving a third reviewer. Received the decision from the editor on 2040419, which completely accepted the manuscript. 
Green Chemistry, as a well-established journal of RSC, is rigorous and meticulous, though a bit slow. The editors verify the information thoroughly and the format is matured. The first submission to Green Chemistry last year was recognized as one of the popular articles of 2023. This is the second submission from both the individual and the research group, hoping it will also be considered for the popular articles of 2024. Appreciating the hard work of the journal editors and reviewers, wishing Green Chemistry continued success

(1) 讚！ | 勤火燎原

Hey, I also applied again. Hopefully, good luck

(0) 讚！ | 杰尼龟101

Is a reject and resubmit assigned to the original reviewer? My resubmission was in the hands of the reviewer for a week and then returned to the editor, but tracking shows no reviewer? I don't understand

(0) 讚！ | AAraya

Should we resubmit rejected papers to the same reviewer or find a new one?

(0) 讚！ | AAraya

Many thanks to Dr. Konoya Das for editing, and the reviewers were also very professional. Their comments on the revision were very helpful in improving the quality of the article. Here is a detailed summary of the submission process:
Submitted on January 10th, sent for review one week later, major revisions on February 21st.
Revision returned on March 13th, received revision comments on March 22nd, one fully accepted, and one reviewer had two questions.
Revised on March 24th, fully accepted on April 5th

(0) 讚！ | 无形

How long after returning will you accept it?

(0) 讚！ | 无形

How long after the repair do you pick it up?

(0) 讚！ | 无形

3.20 submission
3.25 feedback: research direction not quite suitable
give it a like

(0) 讚！ | 氵弎叶草

The reviewers are meticulous and thorough, but the review process is a bit slow

(0) 讚！ | Gdt@Zhang

The manuscript has been received and the editor is very responsible, make sure to address the reviewer's comments properly

(0) 讚！ | @彼岸

No charge required. It's really a well-established journal, and the reviewers are very professional, providing many valuable suggestions that greatly improve the quality of the article

(0) 讚！ | Dddh

Finally back, three reviewers before, two agreed to accept, the third reviewer's opinion disappeared, the editor found a fourth reviewer again, gave some minor revisions, but after the minor revisions were submitted, it started the review process again!

(0) 讚！ | @彼岸

12.18 submission
1.16 major revision
2.4 resubmission after revision
2.19 acceptance
Acceptance after receiving reviewer comments on the revised submission, overall process was quick and reviewer comments were very helpful

(2) 讚！ | zbq

When will I receive the revised draft email after submission? It's been over a week and I still haven't received the revised draft email

(1) 讚！ | qiqi

What about yours in the end?

(0) 讚！ | @彼岸

There wasn't enough time for revisions, the editor followed up on the tenth day, followed up again on the fifteenth day, and coincidentally returned on the day of the second follow-up, quickly with editor, then in peer review, a few days later with editor again, followed by in peer review, and then continued with editor for many days, now back in peer review, what's going on?!

(67) 讚！ | @彼岸

Excuse me, where can I find the journal template for Green Chemistry? The editor says my formatting is off, but I couldn't find any paper formatting guidelines similar to Elsevier and Springer on the GC official website

(0) 讚！ | CAUZBJ

2023.11.07 submit to journal
2023.11.07 initial assessment
2023.11.08 with editor
2023.11.14 in peer review
2024.01.04 major
2024.01.31 revision submitted
2024.02.08 accept
It took exactly three months from submission to acceptance, the editor is a leading expert in the same field, and the reviewers are also very professional. Thank you for the recognition, and hope everyone's submission goes smoothly!

(0) 讚！ | haoshiyaolaidao

Submitted on November 7, 2023, reviewed on November 14, 2023, revised on January 4, 2024, resubmitted on January 31, 2024, and accepted on February 8, 2024. The process took exactly three months, and the editors and reviewers we found were highly professional

(0) 讚！ | haoshiyaolaidao