When responding to reviewers' comments, all questions must be addressed one by one without omission; try to fulfill the additional experiments suggested in the comments, and if unable to do so, provide reasonable reasons why it cannot be done; be sure to cite the literature recommended by the reviewers and discuss it thoroughly; when submitting the revised manuscript, double-check the corrections made in the original draft.
If you agree with the editor's proposed modifications when responding to comments from the journal editor, simply accept the changes. If you disagree, write down your reasons directly below the comment, and then provide feedback to the editor. If there is a discrepancy in opinions, negotiate further

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If conditions allow, try to supplement the experiment as much as possible. If it is really not possible, then consider carefully defending the reasons, but a humble and cautious attitude is essential. After all, there is a certain rejection rate for major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the difference between responding to reviewers' comments and responding to the comments of journal editors?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

The reviewer requested me to conduct additional experiments, but my samples have been used up/ the experiment has been completed. Will my paper be rejected if I directly state that my samples have been used up?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

There are quite a lot of botanical journals, but it is too difficult to target the high-impact ones. This journal is quite good

(0) 讚！ | 洗髓碧菡

There are quite a lot of botanical journals, but the high rankings are too competitive. This journal is quite good.

(0) 讚！ | Napier

Crossing this major hurdle, may the gods bless us!! Let's aim for over 2 points next year

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Trashy magazines, who cares, just submit first and then consider

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁