May I inquire about the payment for this article?

(0) 讚！ | 凌波经亘

Please accept the editor's suggested changes directly. If you disagree, write down your reasons below the comments and provide feedback to the editor. If there is a disagreement, further negotiation will take place

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

All questions must be answered individually, without any omissions. Please try to address any additional experiments suggested in the comments; if unable to do so, provide a reasonable explanation for why it cannot be done. Recommended literature from the reviewer must be cited and thoroughly discussed. When submitting a revised version, make sure to double-check the corrections made in the initial draft

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to respond to reviewers' comments?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

How to respond to journal editor's comments?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted to journal on 2021-01-29, With Editor on 2021-02-04, Under Review on 2021-02-10, Under Review on 2021-02-17, Required Reviews Completed on 2021-03-20, Major revisions required on 2021-03-23, Revision Submitted to Journal on 2021-05-08, Under Review on 2021-05-11, Required Reviews Completed on 2021-06-20, Accept on 2021-06-22

(0) 讚！ | 断门咏歌

What is the key message? Does anyone know?

(0) 讚！ | 平原天逸

What format is used for the reference list? - Sycamore trees in the Sahara, published on 2018-05-08 00:00:00, accepting meta-analysis

(0) 讚！ | 本明大叔

What format is used for references?
Emmons 2016-09-21 09:42:00 posted: Ah, three months of peer review and still no news. Sent an email and they said another reviewer is holding back on returning feedback. This is really dragging on... It's been three months and still no news. Acceptance is good, but if something tragic happens, it would really be a waste of time!... For those in a rush, it's best not to submit. It's better to submit at the beginning of the month where the review cycle is one month, time waits for no one!

(0) 讚！ | 本明大叔

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Accepting meta analysis

(0) 讚！ | 成风小郎君

Editorial speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Oh, it's been 3 months and still no news on the review. I sent an email and they said there's another reviewer delaying their feedback. This is really dragging... It's okay to wait for 3 months, but if something tragic happens, it would be such a waste of time! Don't rush into submissions, it's better to go for journals with a one-month initial review period, time waits for no one!

(0) 讚！ | 形意耕顺

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The first review took 2 months, with acceptance after major revisions. The editor is relatively good, not raising many issues, about 10 from each reviewer. We supplemented some experiments based on the comments from the reviewers and carefully responded to each question before acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 世祥小哥哥

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Success Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Very slow, not just slow, close to three months, too time-consuming

(0) 讚！ | 形意耕顺

Submitted two papers on the basic experimental aspects. The initial review generally takes 2 months. One paper was rejected after initial review, while the other was accepted after major and minor revisions. The requirements are indeed quite high, and the review suggestions provided were very helpful

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞新玲

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Submitted to acceptance in one and a half months, no page charge required

(0) 讚！ | 北陆骊红

Submitted a paper, received the first review two months later, made minor revisions and accepted three days after. No page charges required

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Are there page fees: Not yet at this stage

(0) 讚！ | 南川微澜

SCI(2010): 2.158 SCI(2009): 2.102

(0) 讚！ | 南川微澜

The first review took more than 2 months, but minor revisions were published online in just 3 weeks

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁