Why is it taking so long recently? It has been over four months since I submitted my proposal and I still haven't received any feedback

(0) 讚！ | 千里独行

Is the submission in Word format? The official website does not provide a template. Can you please share the template?

(0) 讚！ | Yaozhazha

External audit comments have been returned, feeling nervous, hoping for a good outcome.

(0) 讚！ | Williamfantacy

Finally passed the three rounds of revisions by the editor and entered the peer review process. Hopefully it will be done soon.

(0) 讚！ | Williamfantacy

This year, it was discovered that the deadline for reviewing and revising manuscripts suddenly shortened to a default of 14 days, compared to the previous two years where it was defaulting to two months. This is too short for major revisions, but just right for minor revisions or formatting adjustments.

(0) 讚！ | cyz

Editorial decision: Major revision

On 27 Mar, 2023

(0) 讚！ | Williamfantacy

Translation:
Editor assigned
On 18 Mar, 2023
Submission checks complete
On 16 Mar, 2023
Submitted to GPS Solutions
On 16 Mar, 2023

(0) 讚！ | Williamfantacy

Translation: 

Submission under peer review
16 Mar 2023
Submission passed technical check
16 Mar 2023

(0) 讚！ | Williamfantacy

2023.3.13 submitted
2023.3.15 revised (Editor-in-chief's comments returned, mainly regarding article format, image format, grammar, etc.)
2023.3.16 revised

(0) 讚！ | Williamfantacy

I have a very basic question to ask. When submitting a paper, should it be in single-column or double-column format? I submitted in double-column format, but it was rejected... and I couldn't find a detailed template.

(0) 讚！ | AW001

Submitted at the end of September, underwent a major revision for over a month, followed by 20 days of minor revisions before being accepted in 5 days. The entire process took less than 3 months. The reviewer's comments were very detailed.

The editor-in-chief has his own academic taste and provided great assistance in the review process, also serving as the reviewer for this paper. GPSS is considered a top journal in the field of geodesy and GPS, and I hope it continues to improve.

(5) 讚！ | GRL

Posted in early May, revised in early July, submitted in mid-August, accepted with minor revisions in early October, resubmitted at the end of October, and accepted in mid-November. The overall process took six months. The reviewer's comments were very detailed.

(0) 讚！ | Miya_

Posted on March 1st, now I have been invited as an editor...

(0) 讚！ | jmy9292

I would like to ask everyone for a favor. I recently submitted a paper to GPSS, but the status changed from "Editor assigned" to "Editor Invited" after 2 days, and it hasn't changed since then. Has anyone encountered this situation before? What does this mean?

(1) 讚！ | jmy9292

GPSS should be the top journal in the field of satellite navigation, with a focus on engineering technology, algorithms, and models. In addition, the journal has added many special topic submissions, including the GPS Toolbox section, which has many open-source contributions! The submission cycle is as follows:

2021-04-26 [Initial submission]
2021-05-05 [Editorial revision before review]
2021-05-25 [Under review]
2021-08-25 [Major revision: two reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision]

2021-09-17 [Author revision]
2021-10-16 [Review completed: two reviewers, one acceptance, one language editing]

2021-10-28 [Manuscript revision]
2021-12-16 [Minor revision, pending publication]
2021-12-19 [Article accepted]

(25) 讚！ | TianmingYun

Only the account of the corresponding author can see the review status.

(0) 讚！ | xu_2022

September submission, early October editing and format revision, still under review on December 30th. The editor mentioned that there are not enough reviewers. I'm wondering how non-authors can check the progress of the review. It feels awkward to keep asking the supervisor about the progress.

(1) 讚！ | yuan_328

The editor-in-chief and the AE (Account Executive) are both very aloof, they don't reply to emails.

(0) 讚！ | lingbaishi

After four months, I received a notice for major revisions. They gave me two months to make the changes, and I have already submitted the revised manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | lingbaishi

I have been under review for over 50 days on my end, I don't know if it's necessary to follow up.

(1) 讚！ | 好久不见

All the editors are working, so it depends on whether the editors are busy or not. In addition, there is a tight resource of GPSS reviewers.

(3) 讚！ | wangxiaoer

Overall, the journal is very good. The chief editor is very good and has his own taste of good and valuable research. I hope they can provide a latex template in the future.

(0) 讚！ | xiahaa@space.dtu.dk

The journal is very slow, why are you all so fast? It took me more than two weeks to revise before reviewing, and now it has been two whole months since I submitted and I am still looking for reviewers.

(4) 讚！ | lingbaishi

The article was submitted on February 18 this year, and the notice of acceptance was received in October 3. It took 7.5 months in total. There were 4 rounds of review in total. The editor-in-chief reviewed the article in the first review, and the comments of the editor-in-chief in the first review were returned on February 22, mainly explaining the format and language issues. It entered external review (second review) in early April. The comments of the second review were returned on May 22. There were 2 reviewers, one required minor revision and the other one required revision, and the editor-in-chief decided “accept after revision”; The manuscript was submitted after revision on June 27, and it entered the third review; The comments were returned on September 21, and minor revision was required. The reviewers were basically agreed, and the editor-in-chief carefully revised the full text, including some questions and grammatical errors. Later, there was a fourth review, and a minor revision was made. It was finally accepted on October 3. It was delayed for the entire March due to my own slack. If we hurried up, 6 months from submission to acceptance should be no problem. GPS Solutions should be one of the Top 3 journals in the field of surveying and mapping. I hope I will continue to submit articles if there are good results.

(4) 讚！ | Shawn001

Submitted for one and a half months; both reviewers gave positive comments. It was submitted for a full three months from December 4th to March 12th. In the top journals in GNSS navigation, mapping and remote sensing, I feel that the journal focuses on the innovation of the idea, especially the experimental verification. I was very lucky to be so successful for the first time. I wish you good luck.

(0) 讚！ | D.J.King