The review process of Global and Planetary Change is very strict. My work was sent to two experts for review. The first round of review indicated that there should be two major revisions, and the editor ultimately requested major revisions. However, the feedback in the email initially seemed to suggest rejection, indicating their high standards. After making revisions for 2 and a half months, the revised manuscript was returned to the system. One month later, I received the feedback from the second round of review. Reviewer #1 asked for modifications to a few words and sentences, while Reviewer #2 did not provide any new comments. The editor ultimately requested minor revisions, using cautious language such as "Your paper should become acceptable for publication pending a suitable minor revision and modification"

(4) 讚！ | 捯饬地球的小Z

It feels like an unpleasant submission. The review process took over two months, which is acceptable. One reviewer suggested minor revisions, while the other seemed to recommend major revisions based on the comments. However, there were no fatal issues identified. The paper was ultimately rejected by the editor. A frustrating submission experience

(0) 讚！ | kyxb

GPC is currently ranked top in Zone 1, although its impact factor is not very high, indicating good recognition both domestically and internationally!

(27) 讚！ | 地质小袁

Submitted in April, accepted in mid-November, with one major revision and one minor revision during the process. The progress was similar to the previous one, but a bit slower. However, I will still consider submitting in the future if there is a chance. The reviewer's comments were very professional and open to argument. The paper ultimately made it to the top tier of the journal.

(6) 讚！ | gangcc

Does it take 9 months to receive the first instance on the 13th floor?

(0) 讚！ | SUN1995

The first review was very slow, submitted in October 2019 and received the first review reply for major revision in July 2020.
The quality of the review comments was very high, and after major revisions, it underwent minor revisions once again. It was accepted in November 2020.
It is a strict and high-quality journal.

(7) 讚！ | yaze

A very demanding journal. After several rounds of revisions made by the seniors in the group, it was finally accepted. The article must have at least regional or global significance. I am optimistic about that it can be categorized as Q1 this year or next year.

(12) 讚！ | yingyang

The requirements are high and you can choose an editor when submitting. The choice of editor is very important, who is the key to send to review. It is needed for articles to have global significance and be supported by solid data. In short, it is a good journal.

(11) 讚！ | bowen

The review process is slow, but the review quality is high. Editors have great decision-making power; the amount of manuscript needed and the quality requirement are relatively high.

(13) 讚！ | chenji

This journal is really slow, three reviewers, the opinions are very professional, it is more difficult!

(0) 讚！ | 地学

The manuscript was submitted and reviewed for 10 months. The final decision was major revision. After revisions, I waited for another one and a half months and then sent a reminder, urging the editor twice, and the paper as finally accepted. The review speed is too slow.

(1) 讚！ | Rhizo

contributed on March 25, 2015, received the first revision opinion on May 15, 3 reviewers' comments, revised on May 17, and edited until July 1.In his hand, he was re-examined on July 2, and received minor repair opinions on September 15. He was accepted on September 25.This process is a full six months.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

March 25, 2015 contributionOn May 15th, the first revision opinion was received, and the reviewer's opinion was reviewed. It was rehabilitated on May 17. It was edited by July 1 and re-examined on July 2, and received on September 15.To the small repair opinion, accepted on September 25.This process is a full six months.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Since the select was short communication, the comments were changed after about 2 months, and it was received directly after the change.The speed is still very fast.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

I used the first trial for 5 months, now I want to modify it, and I don’t give much advice. I also hope to publish it, that is, there is a drama, I hope I can accept it

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The layout fee is too expensive.Fee of $3,000

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Why has I delivered it for nearly a month or with the editor?Would you like to remind the editor

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

that the first review took about 5 months, and the second took less than a month, which was acceptd after a small change.The editor is very good and supports everyone to contribute.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名