Submitted on 2025.02.05
Revised on 2025.03.03, given 2 months for revisions.
Although not accepted yet, the initial review was really quick, thumbs up.

(0) 讚！ | 搬砖法师

A very good journal! Wishing DIBE more success in the future!

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白zzzz

Submit by January 3, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 天空之城1118

From submission to receiving the first round of revisions took nearly 3 months, mainly because it was difficult to find two reviewers. The entire submission process lasted about 7 months

(0) 讚！ | 赛博坦人

A very good journal with great potential. The editor-in-chief is very nice. My first submission was rejected immediately, and the editor explained in detail that there were too many graphs, which would affect the reading experience of the readers. So I spent a week revising the article and resubmitted it, successfully entering the review process. The main problem encountered during the process was a minor unexpected situation where one of the reviewers had some personal issues delaying the review. However, after reminding them, they immediately returned with comments and explained the reasons to me. The invited reviewers and editing team are very professional and careful. They genuinely read the papers carefully, and provide detailed and professional questions and feedback on grammar and language issues.

Submitted on September 8, 2023,
One major revision and two minor revisions in between,
Accepted on April 23, 2024

(0) 讚！ | 赛博坦人

Just ask, is this journal pay-to-publish or peer-reviewed before payment?

(0) 讚！ | LER1128

Oh, because it has been over a month, there is still no information available above

(0) 讚！ | LER1128

You can view it by simply entering the number, but the loading progress is usually slow

(0) 讚！ | 求求accept

Can't the public account of Aisville see the progress of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | LER1128

4/1 Submitted to this journal, it has been 20 days and still no review

(0) 讚！ | LER1128

Thank you, will CBM have much higher requirements than this journal? I'm afraid they will reject my submission if I send it over

(0) 讚！ | 越过山丘

Listen to me, invest in CBM

(0) 讚！ | ssssssaaa

Is there anyone who can analyze this?

(0) 讚！ | 越过山丘

Friends, how is this journal? Is it highly recognized? I submitted a paper a month ago and received two reviewer comments, one minor revision and one acceptance. However, my supervisor does not provide funding for publication fees, which are 20,000. As a struggling PhD student, is it worth paying for this journal?

(4) 讚！ | 越过山丘

2023.09.25 submitted
2023.10.4 under review
2023.12.4 require review completed
2023.12.13 required revisions (back to two reviewers)
2023.12.23 re-submitted
2024.03.14 Accepted

祝愿DIBE越办越好~~~

(1) 讚！ | 糊里糊涂QX

The open-source platform fee has now risen to over 2700

(0) 讚！ | 快乐的小小冯

Is this journal open access? Do we need to pay publication fees?

(0) 讚！ | 董恩来16

Submitted on July 24th
Editing of the manuscript under review since August 14th
Received first reviewer comments on September 26th, editor invited 17 reviewers, 3 accepted
Submitted revised manuscript on October 14th
On October 16th, editor sent reviewer comments to the three previous reviewers, 1 accepted, 2 still pending under review
On October 25th, 1 reviewer accepted, but 2 still pending
Decision in Process on November 1st
Accepted on November 3rd

(0) 讚！ | ForrestQu1122

Submitted in May, revised in August, uploaded for modification for one month, rejected two months later. The editorial process was very fast, usually providing results within five working days. The main issue was with the two reviewers: one provided short feedback after two rounds of reviews, without any help to improve the manuscript, while the other reviewer was slow in providing feedback. The first round of feedback was fine, all 7 issues were addressed in detail, and a 5000-word reviewer reply was sent. However, the second round of feedback focused on the limitations of the methods, which couldn't be changed as it had already been explained why they were used. This submission experience was not good due to the long time taken and the lack of helpful feedback to improve the manuscript

(6) 讚！ | Kai2023

I am very happy with my submission experience this time, being accepted is even happier than being accepted to the TOP in Area 1 as with my previous article. I hope the journal DIBE I chose will surpass CBM next year and enter the ranks of Area 1, I am very confident. The editor's handling speed is still very fast, but very serious, and must ensure that the manuscript is revised to the satisfaction of the reviewers. As a feedback, I have attached the timeline of my bumpy journey.

Jun 08 manuscript submitted
Jun 10 with editor
Jun 20 under review
Jun 21 under review
Jul 8 decision in process
Jul 10 revise

Jul 29 revision submitted
Jul 31 under review
Aug 16 under review
Aug 18 decision in process
Aug 20 revise

Aug 25 revision submitted
Aug 28 under review
Sep 12 under review
Sep 15 decision in process
Sep 16 Accept

(11) 讚！ | 快乐的小小冯

Is this a journal that only accepts open-source content?

(0) 讚！ | CXYpursuit

Rejected, lack of innovation

(0) 讚！ | LXS-

August 01, submit
August 02, with editor

(0) 讚！ | 路先生

It took about 2 and a half months to review, with only one reviewer. The invitation for another reviewer was continuously unsuccessful. The editor made revisions and sent them back to the same reviewer without inviting any new reviewers. After about a week of reviewing, it was directly accepted.

(0) 讚！ | GKQ

Is there any response to the suggested revisions?

(0) 讚！ | foumou