Still in the selection process?

(0) 讚！ | 牧女

Waited for seven months, and still waiting for review, really frustrated. Please don't submit, it's too slow

(1) 讚！ | 山野丸丸

The review process was very slow, it took 5 months to get the result. There were three reviewers, one accepted and two rejected, and in the end it was rejected

(0) 讚！ | LingHK

What are the steps for this? My application has been in "Awaiting co-ed Decision" status for over twenty days after selection

(0) 讚！ | 牧女

Submitted in early July 2021
Rejected and resubmitted at the end of August 2021, with comments from two reviewers totaling 30-40 points, given three months to revise
Resubmitted in November 2021
Major revisions in January 2022, one reviewer did not review, so a third reviewer was sought, resulting in over 30 points of feedback from two reviewers
Revisions completed in March 2022
Optional minor revisions in May 2022 (no modifications required)
Accepted the day after revisions were submitted

(0) 讚！ | 金马玉堂

I submitted it in early March, and just started Awaiting Reviewer Selection a few days ago

(0) 讚！ | 牧女

Hello, may I ask what is the current status of your paper? I have just submitted mine

(0) 讚！ | hongpengzhang

May I add you as a friend and could you tell me the template and article processing fee of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | Dj二狗

I have been waiting for a month and a half. Why is it still Awaiting Reviewer Assignment?

(0) 讚！ | 东方之狮

I have been waiting for a month and a half, why is it still in the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment status?

(0) 讚！ | 东方之狮

One major renovation, one minor repair, lasting for 7 months, published in January of the 23rd year.

(1) 讚！ | Zhan LL

2021.1.21 Submitted
2021.5.17 First decision
2021.6.30 Revision submitted
2021.10.15 O - Optional Revisions
2021.11.16 Revision submitted
2021.11.29 M - Mandatory Revisions (grammar)
2021.12.8 Revision submitted
2021.1.6 Accept

First SCI paper, though it took a bit long, the outcome is still good. The editor was very patient, with one major revision, one minor revision, and one grammar correction. During the process, I sent two reminders for the manuscript. Finally, it was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 筑梦haut

Hello, may I ask if it's convenient for you to send me a submission template?

(0) 讚！ | 小神仙50

Two reviewers, both very conscientious. However, the publication process is really slow, and it takes one year from acceptance to publication.

(2) 讚！ | 爱吃水果的越越

The content of the article is biased towards the model test simulation of the tunnel construction process. It has been revised and accepted for publication.The journal is an old journal of ASTM. Although the impact factor is not high, it is very famous in the field of geotechnical testing. The review process is very formal. At the beginning of the submission, due to the format error, the editor is serious and responsible.correct.The article lasted for three and a half months and was very happy~Manuscript submit 08-Nov-2017First decision 01-Feb-2018 Mandatory RevisionsRevision submitted 02-Mar-2018Decision 19-Mar-2018 Accept

(3) 讚！ | liucong0215@163.com

5 Submitted at the end of the month, the review time is quite long, one overhaul, one minor repair, and the acceptance notice was received in April.The review opinions of the experts are in place. After the revision of the expert opinions, the quality of the papers has been greatly improved.

(0) 讚！ | chxifei@126.com

Recommended, I hope I can share

(0) 讚！ | 1295458017@qq.com

This journal is slow. Although the impact factor is low, the journal is highly recognized in the field. Sponsored by ASTM, and the editors and reviewers are very responsible. The low impact factor may be because this is not from a large publisher so many institution libraries do not have subscription, making the citation rate low.

(0) 讚！ | R

Hosted by ASTM in the United States, focusing on geotechnical testing methods and instrument development, etc.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名