I am also curious if we have invited any "reviewers".

(0) 讚！ | Hoood

Guessing blindly, three districts will be lost this year.

(0) 讚！ | Hoood

The main point of criticism is actually the editor's sloppy and lazy work, which is a key reason hindering the publication of papers. If you don't want to work, you can resign. There are plenty of people willing to do the job.

(0) 讚！ | Hoood

Don't worry too much, just be patient and wait. The quality of the article in this journal is still good, so prepare well for the next one! Keep it up!

(1) 讚！ | 破碎的雨音

This might be the editor reviewing it themselves and feeling that it's not good enough, so they rejected it. I submitted to a certain district 6-point journal this year, and the same thing happened. The review took two months and then it was rejected. The feedback was that the editor reviewed it themselves and the rejection was based solely on their own review, without any specific content.

(0) 讚！ | 破碎的雨音

Is the final review invitation sent to the reviewers or not?

(0) 讚！ | Ge Duo

2024.7.9 Submission
2024.9.9 External review
2024.10.20 Invitation to reviewers
Is it a bit too slow?

(0) 讚！ | Ge Duo

There is a reason why the impact factor of this journal keeps hitting new lows. The editors hardly intervene and rarely send submissions for review. After over a month under review, the manuscript was rejected based on a template without any reviewer comments.

(0) 讚！ | Hoood

2024.1.27 Submission
2024.2.2 External audit
2024.3.20 Completion of the first external audit review
2024.5.16 Completion of the second external audit review, rrc status

(0) 讚！ | wo123

Usually it's two digits, no matter how many times you try, it's always two digits

(0) 讚！ | 不懂

Hello, how many referees have accepted the comments? I'm ten days late, and I'm still in RRC

(0) 讚！ | Lpl57524

Submitted on November 30, 23.
Reviewed on January 20, 24.
RRC on April 1, 24

(0) 讚！ | Lpl57524

2023-11-20: submitted
2023-11-24: with editor
2023-11-25: under review
2023-12-24: Major
2024-2-7: resubmitted
2024-2-8: with editor
2024-2-22: completed - accept

(0) 讚！ | 不懂

2022-5-6: Submitted
2022-5-13: With editor
2022-6-13: Under review
2022-7-21: Required Reviews Completed
2022-8-10: Revise - Moderate
2022-10-6: Resubmitted
2022-10-7: With editor
2022-11-5: Completed - Accept

(15) 讚！ | 不懂

How long does it usually take to hear back from the editor after submitting a manuscript? How soon can a rejection be expected? And approximately how long does it take for a revision to be completed for the first time?

(4) 讚！ | Hakertop

2022.2.22 Submission
2022.11.17 Returned with first round of comments, one reviewer's comment was very pertinent, the other reviewer rejected it
2022.12.24 Completed first round of revisions, polished it again
2023.2.3 Returned with second round of comments
2023.3.18 Completed major revisions...
2023.4.28 Accepted, requested minor revisions
2023.4.30 Completed minor revisions
2023.5.2 Accepted for publication

(2) 讚！ | 嗒嗒鱼

It has been three months since the manuscript was submitted for review, and there is still no outcome. It is very slow.

(14) 讚！ | 厚德载物V

Submitting an article is quite troublesome, so I suggest preparing a good cover letter.
The editing process was quite fast, but my article, which focused on disaster risk management, was rejected after 5 days with the reason being "insufficient knowledge of geomorphology".
I have a positive impression of this journal, perhaps because the editor kindly mentioned "even though the article is interesting and well written," and it didn't take up too much of my time.

(29) 讚！ | NICIIL

2021.8.03.submitted. - Submitted on August 3rd, 2021.
之后一直没送审。 - Was not reviewed afterwards.
2021.9.23给期刊编辑发了邮件后，编辑通知修改图1。当天修改submit - On September 23rd, 2021, I emailed the journal editor and they requested a modification to Figure 1. I made the modifications and resubmitted on the same day.
2021.10.12. under review. - Under review as of October 12th, 2021.
2021.11.28. required reviews completed. - Required reviews were completed on November 28th, 2021.
2021.12.02. under review. 目前已经四个月了。希望接下来好运，有好结果。- Under review as of December 2nd, 2021. It has been four months so far. I hope for good luck and positive results in the future.
2022.01.03. 三个评审意见；编辑拒稿。- On January 3rd, 2022, I received three review comments; the editor rejected the article.

(23) 讚！ | 半尧

Doujinshi
June 22, 2021 - First trial completed
September 20, 2021 - Submitted revised manuscript
October 23, 2021 - Revised manuscript accepted directly

(22) 讚！ | 216读书匠

This journal is a well-established journal in the field of physical geography, with high recognition. The opinions provided by the editors and experts are indeed powerful and with their help, the paper was significantly improved. Although the process was challenging, I learned a lot. I am just curious as to why this journal, which clearly has the level of a top journal, is not considered a top publication.

(174) 讚！ | Goodman-

Review cycle was long (it may be difficult to find suitable reviewers). Reviewers were very serious and responsible, and greatly helped to improve the quality of the article. The specific review process is as follows for your reference: Submission: 2017-01-16; Major revision: 2017-09-17; Resubmit after major revision: 2017-10-24; Minor revision: 2017-12-03; Resubmit after minor revision: 2017-12-03; Accepted: 2017-12-15.

(2) 讚！ | 飞天小猪ljzhu

Received, 19 February 2020; Received in revised form, 20 June 2020; Accepted, 20 June 2020; Available online, 23 June 2020. The review was not only efficient, but the editor was also very responsible. It is a recommended journal. It was my first time to write the article submitted to SCI journal, and it was accepted, which was lucky.

(3) 讚！ | DFCM

The review speed has been accelerated, and the result of review was given in a month. 2019.10.25, submission; 2020.1.1, moderate revision; 2020.1.27, the revision submitted; 2020.2.26, accept (the editor was on holiday or in vacation, it was delayed); 2020.3.2, online. There were two reviewers; the requirements for format were high; requirements for the completeness of article presentation were high; the questions raised were also professional. I hope the journals gets better and better.

(4) 讚！ | ygtwrdx

Submitted on August 23, 2017; major revision on December 3, 2017; revision submitted on January 15, 2018; with editor January 15, 2018; with editor March 15, 2018; with editor April 15, 2018; Major revision on May 3, 2018; revision submitted on May 28, 2018; accepted on August 5, 2018. Took a lot of effort to get this published. During the process, I was so anxious and even thought of withdrawing the manuscript, but it was over now. Review takes a long time at this journal, mainly because of the large number of accumulated papers, and also because the editor is very responsible. The editor read every sentence carefully and gave a lot of comments.

(4) 讚！ | nimin